Archive for the ‘spiritual’ Category

Rainbow stuff

September 3, 2013

It gets so dark at night in the white mountains, it’s like the darkness has a thickness. And the only reason they call it the white mountains, is you can imagine the little bit of white llife, everyone has inside.

I’ve been to nineteen rainbow gatherings. Alabama Talladegha National forest, April 94, Ithica Aug 94, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Kentucky, Ithica, in 95, Osceola 96, Ocala Fl, 99, 2000, 2002, & 2006. Ithica, 97, 99, 2001, 2005, Allegheny, July, 1999, and 3 New England ones. These are hippies gathering in the woods, away from cars, feeding and sharing for free, in different national forests through the year. By far, the new england gatherings have been the worse, the bottom three, the top 15 rival each other in spirit and lessons. The world is far more sexually abused than admitted, and the rainbow takes on probems, the world ignores, so maybe obnoxiousness is this, and the point, to help.

I should also mention I haven’t been to a rainbow gathering in seven years.lll

The rainbow has two issues, amid its myriad of circles and lessons. It discourages alcohol, for which alcoholics congregate near the parked cars, begging for money, extorting alcohol, and often ènough threatening or enabling violence. And this last is what may get the rainbow in trouble; insofar we have no leaders, nor anyone to represent us, and refuse to sign permits; yet sued for “A-camp” liability, policies we endorse or take no action on, everyone one of us will be named a defendant.

The other issue is “The National”. There are smaller regional gatherings of ten to 2000 jan through October, yet every July, usually in The Rockies, or western states. There is “The National, which draws 5000-20,000. I propose having three summer month rocky mountain regionals, rather than one, possibly too big gathering.

The rainbow is not a vacation, but about improving yourself, others and the world, through skills and experience of the rainbow. The gathering is not about running from your problems, but being in a place that can help you deal with them.

My friend Tommy and my dog traveled with me, to the white mountains shadows of Mt Mouisilauke where the rainbow gathered. By shadows I mean, the mountain is so immense as to cast shadow and not be seen, throughout its valleyes, as if the leaves glimmer and resist some far off huge peak between its rustle casting a daunting spell more unseen than seen as daunts.

I told Tommy, these NERF (New England Rainbow Family) gatherings are the worst, boring and stuck up and without spirit, more like private school, than some eternal avante guarde to prophicize the promised land inherent in the rainbow metaphor. I told Tommy, we can’t be separated,that they are jealous of truly good friends, that you must run interference, and help me capitalize on the abused situation, for the obnoxious are always secret victims of abuse

Yet as soon as we get there, parking along The Swift River, than we seperate. Tommy is alcoholic. We both have alcohol. I just knock on wood and sneak it in and share it quietly or take a taste of it now and then, but not loudly party or be irresponsible therein. And they never mind that. Its the babylon of drinking they don’t like, when people use it like cowards to run away from, or start to talk babylon on it, out of pressure to sound fun. Babylon is what they call the world that doesn’t make sense. Is what they are against. In this sense they merge with Reggae, or rastafarianism, and their love of drum circles and making acoustic music in general, and cooking and setting up kitchens in the woods, and sharing, and having some blessing or affection from the state they are in. For instance, Mississippi blessed us with busloads of Christians from a megachurch. Ithica tended to have more poets. Florida has lots of younger people.

Anyway Tommy is scared to pass the “No alcohol” sign at front gate. From front gate to the campsites and main meadow, is two miles. “A-Camp” would as I said, stay near “front gate” and try to be consumed by alcohol. However, at this gathering, there was no A-camp, so Tommy staked this claim, and waited for “kegger Dave”(who is sober now) and “Two Tokes” (who is bad) and “bald head Hawk” (who is good) and “Little Hawk” who is dead, to show up, having been last seen by Tommy in the early nineties.

Fine, so I hiked down the lonely path alone; and towards the end past the campsites, all off one main path, I camped on the hillside side of the path, not affixing as the suburb of a kitchen, as one may do, prefering to be alone and old, until the situation settled.

In truth, there were people panning for gold, just a river curve away from the established fire pit, Tommy propitiously found, right near, where we parked, and he soon wanted to pan for gold and gem hunt, and brought back pounds of rocks as if the car had the payload, and also I felt bad taking minerals from “The Granite State”. I kept the car locked. I didnt want him bringing attention to me. But he cooked and slept in the bushes propitiously near. I hiked enough to see a sign that said, “no sleeping or camping on this side of the road” in the process of getting to “The Benton Trail” that explored up Mt Mousilauke. And the cops or rangers came round that night at 2am knocking on car windows, that if answered, were hit with a fifty dollar fine. I heard they specifically looked for Tommy, at his sight, with search beams, but he had luckily chosen to sleep under a boulder near where he had found some gold flakes numbering about a $1.82, and their lights couldnt see him, and they didnt go trek-look in person.

There hippies who think it is Ok to take rare minerals from national forests, or anywhere.

One can’t escape the sensation, one must better quiet down, to take in the conscious life about, the press actively detracts. Ultimately, that’s what a rainbow gathering takes in, that’a how we are not political but spiritual, and gives us faith.

If you can define “civilized” as being removed and far from truth, from the centralized removal of government, media, corporation, than we should all take on the “barbarian” identity. The barbarian, is more enlightened, than the civilized, being closer to earth, less religiously limited, (by which I mean, more religious), and proner to community, and group-thinking. You can say to a barbarian, that you know they know they didn’t get a life. Indeed, they respect that integrity, its proximity to success makes it vital. And yet, in writing, where it is harder to simply mute, writing exudes civilization.

The rainbows, are more exquisite than the Romans, in their ritual of noon circles, and welcoming strangers into the circle. The tradition, of the barbarian in the woods, the ritual necessary to it, is far more exquisite than what is required to subsist in a day in babylon. Where closeness requires skill, so sophistication, is born. On world which believe in the world, as it is on paper, is less sophisticated, and cruder, than a polity aware of higher power. That higher power is hard to discern, makes its acknoledgement more skilled, than the ignorant. That’s what “enlightenment”, is all about. The rainbow is where the promised land, might be prophecized.

Barbarians have realized the world is better, working together. i would bring over long fallen over thin dead trees and dèposit them near the kitchen “Wanna Burn?”. They had a talent show one nìght, cooked for main circle where evenings, food was distributed; did fire dancing, and I met one fellow from N.J. Who skateboards across the country, states, at a time.

The galls, were the most famous barbarians, and probably because nights were cold in north italy and the alps, they counted nights, and slept days, and so the rainbow it seems, rose to socialize at darkness, and all night, the drums could ring. Also it is customary to yell, alone or enmasse, from campsite and campfire, whatever was wanted to yell. I yelled, “rainbow zombies” and “mind control”; indeed tried to talk about the obvious mind control that created the gathering, and creates politics and tv. And mind control is good to talk about.

A sin of the world is isolation, and rainbow has the potential to bring people together for the numbers wisdom requires. Thats part of the genius of the pagan and classical and tribal world, rainbow adheres to tribal principles, and civilization has removed from us. The press, and government, is far from us; whereas, of rainbow, it is near, if at all. Groups can unleash the power that recognizes the world as ongoing victim, individuals, can’t. It is very easy to say, “mind control creates the world we see” but requires people to see where that mind control comes from, and how..

Rainbow embraces, what the competitive nature of the world might disable; Rainbow enables recognition of what more truly is. People are hurt, betrayed, violated. Where is the place, the community, to admit it? Where does the fulcrum of enlightenment lodge?

People are encouraged to bring at least ten pounds of food to share with the kitchens to prepare and distribute. This is a fairly delightful ceremonial first thing to do. One wants to dispense with the food stuffs as soon as possible, it’s added weight to all the camping gear. So you can walk around and visit kitchens and donate a bit of this and that to everyone, or all to one particular kitchen.

Main circle is where noon council is. It’s also a place where perhaps the most serious and important conversations may be had. I missed the noon councils, and in general did not find much relief in the form of people or circles to engage. There is a snobbiness to the New England Rainbow, the other tribes and regionals don’t have. Maybe the rainbow movement has been seen as the subversive type it is, and infiltrated by those who control it to keep it from being what the rainbow is. While most regionals are two weeks, the New England is only one, allowing less time to work it out. It’s one of the few gatherings that has auspicious worship of a few older people. Most gatherings are like the explosions of leadership by the young at college. I searched out people at main meadow, several times, and cleaned it, two mornings, but found no one. Once people started a guitar circle, which was replaced with a drum circle, which can go on all night around the large main meadow fire circle. In other regionals, people would collapse and sleep right there.

Rainbow and tribes are not about the concentration of power, and its corresponding effect of so much pressure upon the official he/she doesn’t really know what is going on. Moreover they provide the opportunity to discuss the creation upon us with many, in circles, when the isolation and distraction of the more sinful world, circumvents this.

But, if a movement or tradition, is corrupted, the easy access to other people, serious problems require, can be shut down. Though I did not interact much with people, the sheer camping out was calming and a great feeling. I really needed to rise and watch the sun circle round the mountain rim shadowing me, a couple days. It was nice turning off the clocks and going by the sun. Likewise, being in the white mountains of New Hampshire, put me close and hiking trails. There was one night, it thundered, but rained very lightly, and another, that didn’t thunder, but rained long and steady, dampening parts of me trying to sleep, seeping through my tarps. There was also a wonderful consortiums of dogs.

There was one moaner. Ok, passing moans coming from a tent is not something to joke about: It makes you wonder whether every girl passing is a moaner.

I was not able to engage in capfire circles, or hang out near the drums, nearly at all, or as I remember in past gatherings, except two other nerf ones that came to mind, where this impediment exists. Knowing what I suspect of private school, by being aware of the prevelance of sexual abuse, be it naturally under god, or as mere contrivance, or actually mistranslated into society, had I placed that thought prominent, I could have stepped past their features, to the circle, and waited it out to lay it on the line. But I didn’t.

The ideas I wanted to discuss were

The Story of the Universe that gets us here.
Really simple, bad evil universe not into good ole universe, demands sacrifices, pagan culture, for which we create kingdom of god, and society that masquerades covert saccrifice.

Wè as the barbarians, are more enlightened than the civilized, as civilization is the process of moving us from truth.

The afterlife, or remaining consciousness, is no picnic.

The obviously is mind control in the creation of the rainbow world.
This went over the best, so true and within what sounds reasonable the most easily.
Almost sure T.S. Eliot meant, “In the rooms, the women come and go, talking about mind control”
Always others from N.J. At gathering who eventually befriend me.

There was something democratic machine about it, something supposed to be fore the people, corrupted away from the people, and as community is a psychic sense, so there was something psychic to the totalitarianism, as what is constructed, is mind control, the control of what is in the realm of society.

Rainbows should put in time in commerical agriculture, or on large farms.

It takes many to realize the loss, the many is one thing, the rainbow offers.

Seems like upper and middle class sells soul for money and or good job. Bars can not get as serious as campfires.

Hard but good hiking in white mountains all around; if wasn’t so tired and needing to get away.

Sensations, there’s not much life in each head, but a little, to feel
Sensations, the kingdom of heaven does see from inside or through the eyes of the kingdom of god, and even, surrounds the kingdom of god.
Sensations, all our heads are together in mind space

Additional notes, 1) lots of activity, at night. Also, lots of periods of quiet during the day. Gallic tribes did same strategy.

2) No rich people at gathering, fairly put, a lower class thing, very few people with middle class jobs.
Also, regarding NERF, (new england rainbow family) gathering, no pick-up trucks, the rainbows haven’t picked up the red neck pick-up truck charactor they are prone to. All I’m saying, pick-ups, are like the high cavalry of the lower class;

the drums have barbarian beats.

There is a real line of quiet, under there, is quiet.

The rainbows howl at night. Good reason to not smoke.

Not burning man or shows, or costs money, but hippie chill quiet, a big part of which being in the woods, outdoors, beautiful and public setting.
It’s not some “Hey Amigo” “What’s up” but about reaching the back nine of society better.

A big part is getting into the peace and quiet of camping.

Barbarians have realized things are much better, working together


The Liability of Atheism

August 13, 2013

nNot only does constitutional concentration of power create vulnerability to wider criminal network, and crime, and this seems designed so, and not only is article 1 2a, of state constitution, a device to look into this by the people: But the adherence to atheism by government is very foolish.

Should the kingdom of god, or the being transformed from human be shown, (of concern to numerous professions, exposing market economy as dictated by higher power, on paper and not at all what it claims, something very apparent to me and others in small business, I had an organic agriculture 6 years before this)the public good would greatly benefit.

Working with a number of people, as it takes many to grasp the trauma and loss of life of the kingdom of god, rather than be ruled through it, The Kingdom of God is easy to show, upon which true economy, though purposely diverted, may be created, and light cast upon war and our justice system, as merely killing and oppressing.

People seeing the still bodies, we would arrange, would then have to discuss what steps to take, path to go on. Such sight would effect medicine, show folly of crime, and deem what is truly most important.

This is what government would concern itself with. The people, and their sense of responsibility may have been undercut by a design of government designating seriousness for itself. Government, certainly, has means, resources, charter, for this work. The people have trouble with this comprehension, contradictory and illuminating a negative as it is, and sad, and thus working through it with the seriousness of government, is a part of this appeal and action.

Aug 13, 2013  Victor Fedorov

1)      Atheism is at the root core of our problems. It is purposely there, by design on higher power, to keep us from fundamental knowledge and this is the nature of totalitarianism, I  attempt to convey.

2)      Were atheism recognized as specious assumption upon the human race, as ignoring the transformation to being, which Christian Terminology calls the Kingdom of God, we would have a more even bead upon society’s ills and healths.

3)      Atheism places a great deal of pressure upon judges and parties.

4)      It takes many, and seriousness and respect to apprehend the trauma and loss of life, The Kingdom of God, or Being, signifies. Atheism is consistent with isolation, misplaced seriousness, alienation.

5)      It is hoped, working with the division of law, or the people, the kingdom of god, and stillness to the body can be shown. Resource, seriousness and many, can easily prove and show a transformation to the human, that media and government, purposefully if unconsciously obscures.

6)      There is a professional relevance to determining this information, and certainly, great public benefit, and shows things as they are; totalitarian falsehoods fulfill this system now.

6à) The psychology of the problem is more be the contradiction of long operating assumptions, and not the easily understood truth of the matter.

7)      I have been denied by opposing party, and a casp conference, by judiciary the opportunity to sit and seriously discuss this. (motion for casp conference). One would assume, communication is where justice begins.

8)      I spoke on this in oral arguments, as the most important and pressing thing for the judges to be aware of. For they totally neglect this comprehension. It was beyond them.Nor did lower court allow my leadership, for the spiritual is contingnent upon recognizing injustice.

9)      Showing the kingdom of god, would reveal paths and steps to public good, and destroy atheistic assumptions governing government, market economy, medicine, and use of media.

10)   Atheism, denies an important loss of life by the human race, creates the wrong kind of seriousness, is inimical to justice, and seeing the true underpinnings and condition of injustice or conflict. Thus druids of justice were spiritual among Germanic tribes.

11)   Revealing The Kingdom of God would turn the Justice system upside down. Yet as higher power controls things, factor in whether higher power wants such, or allows us discussion.

12)   Atheism causes despair, inability to functional and apprehend, increases vulnerability to and victimization by crime, and a root from which crime flows. It is another artificial device to make society more dangerous and harmful, in what is shown, for the ends we seek to discuss. Atheism is part of the plan creating harm and danger to the people, and government.

13)   Atheism is a legitimate constitutional issue, as it seems to found our government’s assumptions, in many branches and acts. It’s discussion, particularly as we cut to the quick and show how human race really physically is, a goal that requires work but is very rewarding.

14)   The matter of this case, and crime in general, is posited upon atheism. Were the people more spiritual over the years, this could not have happened. Were people not a totalitarian society grounded in atheism, there would be less oppression.

Julius Ceasar, or Jesus Christ?

May 6, 2013

Julius was assassinated, by widespread conspiracy, about 12 years before Jesus was born. Both had “last names” that were not real last names, but adopted. “Ceasar” is a name for “king” or “Dictator” and “Christ” is a name for a “real” or “saved” human. “Ceasar” might imply a certain genius, “Christ”, a more active state, than “being”.

Now whereas Jesus was born and heralded and searched for, as King of the Jews; Julius had to scrap and commit crimes and bribe and fight, to attain the position, Governor of Gaul. And whereas Jesus’s being King of the Jews, might have automated so ordaining of power and destiny, Julius had to fight 7 years in the gallic mountains against unruly, at least according to History, Gallic, Germanic, and later British Tribes. Nevertheless, Jesus, in his element, reigned as Supreme as he was, and Ceasar, defeated Gallic insurrections, each year, poising him to unite a fractured Rome, warring against itself, as other generals commanded their troops, to such loyalty as to fight other roman generals, commanding their troops, specifically, Pompei and Octavius. Thus while the faction of John the Baptist, pressed forth, to herald Jesus to greater success, the factions of Pompei and Octavius, pressed and forced Julius to triumph.

And yet both were pyrich victories. Jesus, led to Christianity, Ceasar, upon his death, to a Roman Empire; both of which had the same subtle historical goals of declining tribal life; of declining the paganism, that relied on tribalism, to be effective, and a real metaphysic. Christianity, accepts the state, as that contrary faction it may in theory overcome, and the Roman Empire, spiraled out of control and into the lower standard of polity, which to this day, good Christians, and good service, tries to oppose and forgive, in a more natural and godly morality, than an atheistic state.

John the Baptists heralding of Jesus, as more accepted holy men may do; is like Pompei’s mentoring of Jesus, until they were forced to fight, decades later. And yet it may be undeniable that life was better, before Jesus and Julius, that times under Pompei, and with John the Baptist, freeer and better. That both Julius and Jesus were vehicles that led to further oppression by historical structure, that while they were both very superior to their competitors in spirit and war; among if the greatest, of what they do, of all time; you can not deny, the Roman Empire, Julius enabled by holding together a Roman Republic fracturing apart from it’s size, was far worse than life in the republic; and that though Jesus be the perfect leader we sought; there have been no perfect leaders since then, so tight his domain he left..

John notes the Pharisees and vipers; pompei notes Rome fracturing and fissuring from powerful generals gaining loyalty from troops, via plunder of war; and both led to one greater and eclipsing. John reminds all of their common ancestor of Abraham, the good roman generals, reminded the people of the morality and diplomacy of the Roman Republic which united and created them. When Jesus was baptized by John, a dove flew by, saying, you are my chosen son, and Heaven opened up. Under Pompei’s mentorship, the governorship of Gall opened up for the politician and official, Ceasar, that would lead to his saga of holding together a republic growing too large, and prone to horrible civil wars because of it. Thus, their mentors, associated, with the path before their protégés. Ceasar was like the holy ghost compared to Pompei, and Jesus, to John as well, for they both had historical destiny before them, to become the best there’s ever been; even while that cult of greatness, in both case, had the tragic downside of making the known world inferior, to its pagan and pre-empire polities.

When Jesus says, “It is written, man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that precedeth out of the mouth of god.” 1) He reminds us both Julius and Jesus, were established through books, gospels, and in Ceasars case, the notable history he kept and published of his gallic campaigns. 2) It evokes the sieges armies back then go through, the lack and primacy of food, and how spirit, and favor of higher power. It evokes how success is grounded upon the greater godliness; and that an army winning on its stomach, only half true; Spirit and divinity, being the other half. As Ceasar tried to subdue Gaul, where they lived on corn more than grain, he was not tempted to live and let live; but grow the republic for the glory of Rome. The Devil urging Jesus to prove himself by jumping from a cliff; very much the military axiom of Not doing the foolish thing. Jesus is all about resisting temptation; which a prime tenet of good generals.

Who can not see the similiarity between the Devil taking Jesus to a high mountain, and offering him the world, would he submit; and Julius, scaling the alps where the galls live and don’t like Rome, and wondering what to do. As Jesus chose the Lord, the jewish lord no less, and resisted temptation again; so Julius consistently reminds himself to behave, and not let the cruelty of war, enact his vengeance upon gallic towns and cities. Jesus offered a light, to the way of death of society; To be sure, Roman encroachment upon Gall, was no light, but a false one of historical significance, and yet Ceasar, did lead Rome to a pacified Gall, and then Rome herself, to civil order under his reign, upon defeating the other generals.

Jesus takes fishermen and makes them fishers of men. Julius demands soldiers and makes them soldiers. Jesus went to synagogues around Syria and Galilee and preached and healed. Syria was a known spiritual religious proud place. Julius went to Gall and Germany, france and Britain, not healing and preaching, but putting down insurrections and organizations and villians against Rome: Two totally different natures. Jesus, for his victories and demonstrations of Spirit, soon had people following him. Julius tried and did make friends with the numerous tribes of Germany and Gall, one by one. And yet, they would fall against him, under the leadership of militant bararians who would annually rouse against Rome, and did the people following Jesus around Galillee, continue to follow him? And weren’t the tribal distinctions to be dissolved by Rome, more and more, by state; and weren’t the people’s of Syria, uniting in following Jesus, and so forgetting the tribes they come from? In this sense, Jesus ruled not the jews, but peoples of Syria. And Julius, not the people of Rome, at least not until the tribes of gall were dealt with. Multitudes of people followed Jesus. Multitudes of soldiers, Julius. Jesus said, blessed were the meek. Julius, blessed loyalty and fortitude, with reward. Jesus blessed the humane and human side of character, the mourning, the hungering for righteousness, the merciful, and pure. Whereas Julius valued, strength, endurance, faith, and loyalty. And here they differ. The Julius men were about restricting themselves to prevail, doing great things, by being less; such; whereas Jesus proclaimed passion and character and fulfillment and manifestation, into the greatest and richest parts of character. Jesus was not about the sparse, but those living fully; whereas the roman ethic was quite a paucity, a hardship, a tradition of the nobility of less; that allows a constrained morality, wants propriety and form; has an absent dimension, to be sure, where Jesus had a dimension of spirit, so important to his followers, to transmit spirit further; yet the spirit of Rome, was to spread. Needless to say, the spirit of Rome, equated with the spirit of Christianity, equals the end of, and removal of, old ways; from hundreds of tribes around Europe, to medieval dark ages, why they called it the dark ages, no more tribes around Europe; and from hundreds of religions, a pantheon of palpable quiet phenonoma to unify and query, to the under ten major religions we have now. Needless to say the gospel is the story traveling, by foot, around the middle east; and Ceasar;s history, regard his traveling around northern Europe, with thousands of soldiers. So they say. So it is written.

So what is the relevance of this literary, historical irony? Coincident initials? Or historical design, revealing a pointed creation of history with irony in mind? Karma?

The forebearance, resourcefulness, spirit and discipline of Ceasar; the purity of Jesus: The Kingdoms of God and Heaven are important. The KIngdom of God, explains how History is possible. History might not reveal the Kingdom of God, and survive, in its nature; and that makes Jesus the potential gamechanging transcender he is and we aspire to; The Kingdom of Heaven, which John preached as well, as near, whereby, repent! for history is over soon, for a new reality, say you as an individual are done, and part of larger mind now. But the value of understanding Ceasar’s rival currency, is he is dealing with Crime; at several levels. War is a crime, making men soldiers a crime, plunder, keeping plunder, using it to bribe, to buy off whole people’s in exchange for their favor and popular reflection; Ceasar is about crime, and the perversions of politics war reflects. Now if we look at the earth and human beings about us; contradicted that be by media; there is not only the domain of the kingdom of god; apart, dwarfing, making irrelevant any other societal impression or creation; for in that ghostly so reality; all the crime, perpetuated upon, and corrupting perversity, that holds back the higher classes from a more sensitive history and ability; is within the ghost of the kingdom of god as well. Where John may preach the kingdom of heaven is near; and try that ploy to reduce society to pure righteousness; The proclamation of Jesus baptizing with the Holy Ghost, is the promise of the revelation of the kingdom of god to people, and that ghostly state revealed; for the kingdom of heaven lives in and with the kingdom of god, going all through earth’s diurnal course, minute and second by minute and second together, a great big one of humanity, living on its limitations together, both after and physical life.

We claim to look at this ghostly life, or at least feel its ghostliness; in that ghostliness a totally different way; a way as it really is, a way of less, but also a way where and how crime and all the bad things and bad ways and negative and way of dying, society and history be full of; even as history not reveal the kingdom of god, and therefore the extent of crime, perversity, and degradation unrealized, and yet to be revealed, as a political concern and reality; it must be seen as parcel to a spiritual reality, parcel to a state or kingdom of still, ghostly, being. All sorts of things are done to this state; things that are secret, like that state itself, to history, ostentasibly: Nor can that state rise above itself and confess or take responsibility; for it is not allowed, and frustratingly denied, as contrived status that is.

Thus, were one, to confess: to me: I would help show how it involves the many in this state. Any confession to me, of guilt, responsibility, would lead to an exposure of the way and whole, and a whole network of worst crime, enabled like history and society through the kingdom of god that can put on the show, humans can not; would cease. We live in a world, where crime is all about, classes, allegedly controlled, jobs based on conforming to this way; pornography, and all that is unknown to the media, yet is; and though these offenses exists, parcel to a state of the kingdom of god, that is not spoken of, they are almost not felt, or revealed: because they are not known by media, and media sets the dimensions of discussion. So how can one confess, even the sins upon me, let alone all, unless Heaven allows it, or the requisite seriousness conducted?

Must it be done in the highest rarfied echelons of Society, like the judiciary, or pinnacles of religion, or town meetings? For society flows from there, what trickles down, or has trickled down, like it or not, we subsist on. And what seems and is said to be, really isn’t; and what and how really is, not known. Oh, there is negotiation, I pray to Heaven, but what exactly do I pray for, and how can the haze occur? On the one, I pray some reveal the wrongs put on through them, put on because they are the kingdom of god, and many are implicated, and so they will need help, and so I will show them what really is, and possible know how to create some better reality. This is the metaphor for ceasar,trying to work with the different tribes of Europe, trying to gain movement, through this and that that may enable it.

The problem is that there is no confession, for such the way, of crime, behind the scenes, critically unreported, through further control, would cease, and a new reckoning again. The tribes, though, Ceasar faced, fought, made friends with, their names suggest own pagan ways. The Nervii, well, focus on the nerves with friends and what makes seem, and what shock the pressure upon the heart. The Aduei, can we say good by and stay, can you leave? For from there, that salvation, not of justice, but pure, but Christian, and of terminology, rather than group discussion.

So one knows of bad things I may reform; But one is hard pressed to say so, not out of fear of implicating many, not out of lacking trust in me; not in the illness and finess of creation; but in that the way, outside History, but secretly effecting History cease, and a new reckoning begin. Julius would look at the world and try to straighten it out, figure out what is really going on, be motivated by the recognition and knowledge, crime goes on through the kingdom of god, reform and spirituality go together, a spiritual nondeceptive government is possible. Jesus would look at the world, see the dualism between god and man, see the skitzophrenia, the knowledge of a secret world, osmosized with God causes; yet critically have, not necessarily the divinity of a winner, but the ordination of Heaven that comes with the Jews being the father of your creation and design, the lord intervenes for Jesus, whereas Ceasar represents, like John the Baptist, the sweat of the brow, the innovation of the man, the feeling and compassion that leads to success; should we generalize.


Healing, jesus, conquer, fortitude, governor not gall equals campaign. divinity close to chest.
Healing people through Syria, like conquering galls, fortitude and skill, superiority, divinity. The aquitani: To acquit someone, basic justice, basic spirituality, point out kingdom of god, the body, how it’s controlled, so individual, 1, a part of everyone, and 2 not that body, or at least merely operating that body. Likewise, the belgae, the beautiful, if one is to be beautiful, one must be explaining how earth and humans really are. This honesty is pagan essence, or foundation to there thereof, and you explain to someone how no one did it. To get out of the state of injustice to the state of justice. Ceasar and Christ, their world hasa proximity to themselves, close to them, their world emenates from. How do you describe the world in appealing terms. It is more the lack of apprehension by the listener. There’s a lack of apprehension of the same thing, beauty describes. For the individual today, is bogged down, in his primary identification as a reproducer, without apprehending what is reproduced, maybe that is the context facilitating ablest communication, and yet that is hard to apprehend, what we do as reproducers. Reproduction, is what we are resisting, a knowledge of what we reproduce.

Able communication is like moving to a new area, which is what the warlike helvetti did. The helvetti,has rich men, 12 towns, and 400 villages, if you believe history.

A subtle shift in leadership, from one unruly gall to another, can make a difference in the heart. Perhaps it is shifts in the heart we seek that understands what we produce. A shift in heart to certain understadings, whereby the listener, hears better, as my heart climbs up to my left ear. We understand speaking truth is important. An evil rich man, tried to lead to the helvettie to war, and they found out he was crooked, the penalty for which, being burned alive, in chains, his ten thousand supporters came and escaped him, but he apparently soon committed suicide. Perhaps this requires a magistratial air. THis removed sense signifies the literal difference, a bush or Obama can have on our herts.

The change in heart, that realizes a criminal doesn’t have to be caught to talk. ANd yet this way, of sacrificial justice, is exactly that. It goes on, they get caught, and then they need help. IF only we could have a change of heart and talk about this, before their claim by history is manifest. So the Helvetti journey, ornery, strong, looking for trouble, leaving their homeland to look for trouble, and take over somewhere, and Ceasar governor of gall, hears about this, and like a juvenile outwitting a nine year old, takes out a bridge, intending to cut them off, and so, we try to shift in our heart to a more apprehensive place, my god the word apprehensive itself, needs to change, letters drub off my heart, congeal have to talk, yeech————————————————-How to change my heart?

As predicted, CEasar, in third person in book, told their envoys, who got the job, if you can consider it a job, their richest men. Don’t know why they didn’t send the poor and normal. Probably because this is historical, and history, when not flowing through the state, flows through the rich upper class, so the upper class is more corrupt, and prone to controls and marks, that may make them prone to war; having been hurt as a child perhaps; So Julius, who is probably doing this for profit, but it’s his history book, says, no, you can’t march through provence; I don’t trust you, and you guys were rude to a counsel of mine a few years ago, nor nice to one of our armies, now that I recall. Now if the envoys were poor, they might have given their word on safety and the oath mean something; or gone back and said to the guys, we should go home, or sneak by another day, though that may have effected their pride; lord knows how played historical tribes can be.

But what happened, Ceasar fortified the river area, and the Helvetti, had to say “hell” and go through the mountains, on a path so thin, it required the attention of the sequestri locals there, who declined to give it as well, perhaps Ceasar coerced them? Would it be in his history book? The helvettie, appealed to the adieu to help. And this is where it stands. Hell of course, a horrible ejaculation, insofar it’s hard to escape, which is why treat yourself well. Now, this is what happens. There are people all around they are moving them. This is some bypass of vic

It being Ceasar’s first year on the job, he still doesn’t like them coming closer to the subjected or conquered French lands of tribes, and quickly home to rome and back with a few more legions. A few gallic tribes try to stop him on the way back, they merely delay him a week. When he returns, the helvetti are pillaging everybody, several tribes, in each direction. Is this pretext romans make up? Are the helvetti condemned and doomed to slings and slingshots whose volley return are boulders of Rome? Is this sacrifice of an army? Is that the metaphor? or dark etchings upon roman brick rock? Step into the earth? Chilling, the sense of the metaphor, history, we’ve become numb to.

The plundered tribes appealed to Ceasar for Help, according to ceasar, and Ceasar defeated them, and they took and eventually ceasar tracked em down, and they sent their rich envoys again, offering, we’ll go where you tell us and stay there for peace. The Romans, and Ceasars great uncle had suffered a defeat by then a few generations ago; so like Iraq, this might have been of payback for fighting Iraq 1, Bush’s dad.But he l

Ceasar doesn’t let it go. The condemned tribe is very sad. Ceasar admits he is indigant of the defeat some generations ago. But he laughs off the haughtiness with the old, canard, fortune piles high upon the wicked, so when fortune changes, they will be hurt more.

So the Helvettie take off, and the romans follow 4-5 miles behind; one rear guard, and the other advance guard, skirminshing along the way. The morale that one false victory, does not equal a stronger team; when their rear quard defeated roman calvary; tended more battle, than wise for the helvettie, who should have just led them on a long march through the woods of Germany into Russia or something. So the cars are spent by. Obviously some rate inside my head needs to be typed tobe true.

We must spend an evening, evening a shift in my heart. We must spend an evening, how easily death can be accepted, we must spend an evening acquitting everyone. This is serious, and now that I’ve got tommy, we’ve got explore; yet there is noTommy. But today we feel the frank damage to earth, environmentally, pressing up against, as if that is where success is grounded in, and that is where we go; restoring a natural world. ……

The adieu tribe, says goodbye to the people for the world of the mind about that must help

Feminism and Facism

March 26, 2013

1) Feminism and Fascism are very similar. For instance, Feminism is up against the oppression of women through objectification, lack of respect, and spirit….or whatever….Feminism is up against the oppression of women, as defined, regardless. Fascism is up against oppressive systems as well. Fascism, like Feminism, is authentically dissatisfied with the world, or aspect thereof, and therefore seeks spirit and means to correct oppressive forms.

2) Both Feminism and Fascism are short term expedient means that should expire upon fulfillment of goals. This involves some redefinition of fascism as short term expedient, means, perhaps undesirable, out of the necessity compelled by unsatisfactory situation.

3) This means should pornography and whatever effects that not quite right emphasize on this and that, rather than elbows or feet, or ears, is corrected; the spirit of feminism will change; it may be able to be less shrill, resort to less sexism in its own right, and command and attract a more middle of the road popularity. The same is true with fascism understood this way. Say the fascist is disgusted with the corruption in government, and lack of community about; and he changes those things; well, now the world is better, and one can be less fascist about it; some order has been restored; the cause is less passionate now, thank god; calm and peace, abound about.

4) Both female and fascist movements, have had more success in classical times; when things were tribal; and change based on merit, and ability; of course the odds in pagan times may have been greater: But in modern times, in Judeo-Christian times, the suffragette movement, burns forth, and gets the vote; The ERA movement of mid seventies, is looked at, and not treated as serious or needed enough; whereas the symbolism alone is enough to entertain seriously the idea. Likewise, Fascism, really hasn’t done anything in America, and since the fifties, and the rise of communism, almost permanently downgraded to some bogeyman status. Yet, like those examples of feminism, fascism, by my definition, is a short-lived expedient movement; like a dictator might solve problems quickly, but who wants to live under a dictator long, (and aren’t the presidential terms, outrageously too long and boring) it’s not the ideal solution or desirable; whereas likewise, the four year presidential term was devised for the expediency of security, not desirability.

5) Then of course both feminism and fascism has this cool controlled anger behind it. And it’s important for both fascists and feminists to swear they don’t really mean to hurt anyone.

6) I think both forms are prevelant to local, not national, conditions; despite history’s story; and both seek a divinity grounded in spiritual understanding, for godliness is the most peaceful way to progress in politics, and socially.

7) What is it that causes the oppression of women? What is it that causes our political oppression? Metaphysics. Success, is based on wisdom. Fools sell out causes and faiths.

8) Both are grounded in authoritarianism. Authoratarianism, is where the authority for one’s action, one’s self, or authority in general, like courts, or employers, or friends, socially, as it exists, justifies their behavior if questioned. The idea of authoritarianism, is that it the acts of authority can be questioned, and raised, and if not justified and explained, then the authority itself, loses its right to have authority.

9) I mean both suggest one doing something about something: Both are about taking action in trying circumstance, raising spirit, coalescing right minds; seeing where the tributaries of concern lead to; having the concerns of community in mind.

10) Indeed, the paths diverge here and regroup later, on several counts. A) Fascism is more authoritarian than Feminism, in that the control that emphasizes the reproductive parts of females is metaphysical. And metaphysical control, is the essence of totalitarianism. There is no one to appeal to. No authority answers. One searches God, or Goddess, and there is no congealed authority per se, that rises to help, in modality-authority-familiar/with, conscious of, as authority in society is set up. And yet, by same token, our polity is totalitarian, insofar inexpliquable events ocurr, people question and want change; yet no change happens, and more so, no authority stands up and says “No” or “I am standing against Common Sense”, and then says why, and justifies such, honestly and actually and exactly. So even when people stand up to this totalitarian polity it is hard to shake the totalitarian shackles around them. Their consciousness is limited, by what unofficial, yet really, secretly official, media projects. They are limited, by not being taught thinking together, being told what to do, ignorance of the kingdom of god, lack of cultural emphasis upon spiritual paths. These limitations are totalitarian as well. Feminists are leaders of all women in particular, or, like all good fraternities, so they claim; the way fascists, or people trying to do something about a trying situation, are the advent of everyone, ideally—-so naturally both, successful, conclude on notes of restoring power to consensus, truth, thought, knowledge, analysis.

10a) Yet the control upon women, is on each; and the control upon one’s thoughts, is on each; and both have individuals of verying degrees shaking the controls; yet still, in spirit, we all understand, it is upon each. The enlightened should not think anyone is not capable of rising. Some are there, when freedom breaks, ready to love, and some will need to be loved, to overcome what has happened. And yet it is easier for the women to embrace all women, than the fascist to embrace mankind. The male may have a natural antagonism, the oppression of women, metaphysically, may have rubbed out there.

11a) and 11b) That tribal practice of tribal circles, of which half the gallic town formally had to attend, and all else welcome to join in: Most advanced the means of merit and wisdom advancing. These circles in gallic villages, according to Ceasar in his account of campaigning there, were daily. That to ground feminism in authoritarianism, feminists and their ilk, must take care to stand behind what the say and project, respond and take down the questions of those who don’t understand. If there is nothing but vapor behind the words, the words don’t mean a thing. They say one’s image can shake one’s ideas, but feminism requires human faces behind it to advance.

12) Feminism hasn’t changed much; though thankfully we are now more exposed to working with women, than before, and that is a very good thing, per their ability to supervise, and be trusted. But authoritarianism dictates, that for feminism to change something; a feminist must stand out and stand up and speak the truth; and then she must be challenged, by the status quo, and then she must withstand the challenge, and then defeat the challenger; it requires a face, faces; and then things may change, when the people see the world standing up to one women, and failing. Without a face, and without challenge for that face to respond to, there is no change. And of course, this is a basic model or modality of fascism. Indeed, allow me a little sexist humour; “fascism” comes from “fasces” meaning sticks or rods, which signified the might of the chosen counsel. Back then, Rome didn’t trust one president, so elected two, and they would alternate being in charge, day by day, who held the fasces, was dictator constrained by senate, that day.

13) Fascism, Feminism, as means to ends, realize, objectification, more important things than sexuality, protecting sexuality, treating sexuality with the admiration or respect it deserves, and a people being able to reason together, and estimate it’s own chances; these concerns lead to group focus, not individualism; communion with “God”, not hard legal matter. Thus they intend diffusion of power. A long term dictator, why would he be a dictator, unless the results were so great, or he leads to gentler means, and finer polity.

let me take charge

March 7, 2013

DOCKET NO. A-000478-12

Vic Fedorov Pro Se CIVIL ACTION
Veronica Fedorov
c/o Ron Fraoili Esq.
304 Hackensack St.
Wood-Ridge N.J. 07075

Plaintiff Reply Brief

Vic Fedorov Pro Se
219 Yardville-Allentown Rd
Yardville N.J. 08620
201 232 1154


3 ……………… …… …… MATERIAL FACTS
6 ………………… …. LEGAL ARGUMENTS
6 Due Process, Recovery, Healing
6 Does It Make Sense?
7 Monell
7 Article 1:1 N.J. Constitution
7 Rules
8 What to Do
8 A miscarrying judiciary is the origin
10 Why Litigate, Explain, Civil
11 People behind in Hoboken.
12 They’re made
13 The universe is less, that’s why we have the kingdom of god.
13 Rebuttals by Plaintiff
16 Judgment, Individual Stories, Want Reform,

Was Vera’s demise, planned long ago, able to hide behind Court? By widespread means and organization capable of controlling other instances, as well.
Certainly for Veronica and Mark, to either show they are managing, or say they are oppressed, and do neither, is not a constructive scope or adequate counsel, or capacity to manage their affairs.
The control, of so much, to get here, I would like to examine, and question people about, untoward remedy and reform, trusted. This is what a farmer comes across? Corrupt in laws, merger of law and crime, widespread silence? How does one believe in Justice? Is this merely an opportunity to point out people are made, at the highest order of society, and try to change thing?.
Can the court get my siblings, or anyone to work honestly with me? Even if I am restored to power, there are scores of criminals who conspire and network; people and spirituality has to lead to them. Injustice goes on too easily and dangerously to detriment of family and people and ethics.
The courts erred in issuing letters of administration, allowing foreign venue upon fraud, not recognizing the lack of discovery is consistent with crime, and money taken from Mark and Veronica: Nor that I am trying to protect them, or their counsel and Defense, suspicious and works for those who control them, not them. That will and trust immediately are suspicious; That people are silenced, that it is important to know how. That people know Vera had several much later wills. That honesty, as precondition to settlement, means due process, and professionalism. The Court erred not recognizing slander, in dismissing the case without Discovery, or medical records, in not discussing fraud, and not promoting honesty, and duly processing what the lack of discovery implies, and what my siblings state, and opposing counsel implies a too easy acceptance of, should be helped, what did they go through, and others. I need to know to protect myself family and people. They can not and have not protected the wealth, nor were intended to. For as I have written, and you know most of all, the design of Society is purposefully unsafe. This is a vehicle for that exploration and yourself, and court.


1) There is a litany of errors made in lower court, all of them harmful, and conscious.
2) No due process, which would show the way of honest constructive talk, as goal of civil court, and calm.
3) Slandering me as mentally ill, when no doctors, complaints, medications, since February 1993; and years of steady work.
4) Dr. Lyndahl, of St Vincent’s l then explained to Vera, it was just difficulty of expression, not mental illness. In 2010, I had income and resources from a more than full-time 6 years in organic agricultural, as well as income and resources from, working for my mother for which I I had a monthly retainer; and a trust from my grandfather for 80,000. That is what should be said about me and Vera.
5) The harmful and conscious, criminal, error, of not recognizing Slander, and other suspicions such as old 94 wills, unsigned when drafted, little discovery, is a tort that harmed the estate, siblings, others, by allowing untrustworthy murderers and criminals to loot and manage the estate and family.
6) Slander, tort, deny, honest talking, constructive truth.
7) They want to keep my family? I would convert people to morality from subjective conscience? They can control others, but not me? Psyches damaged from abuse, trafficking? See the destructive nature we need to work with? Communication crumbles it.
8) I never desired Hudson Venue, I went along with it to secure discovery quicker. When I saw the foreign unfair venue, I moved to change venue, per fraud too.
9) Defense obscures connection between conspiring powers in Hudson County, desiring Vera’s wealth, in Hoboken; probating falsely abets. Their response is dismissive, ignoring.
10) Counties taking care of their own. Denial of due process
11) When I worked with Vera, we would enter our company bills into the computer, per vendor and building. I was aware of mortgages, monthly revenues, and their distribution. This is far from what it is now. I saw quarterly mutual fund statements.
12) Standards of Appellate Review, resists summary judgment upon incomplete Discovery. If Discovery’s not there, Crime is.
13) Judges, Mark, isolated, protected, to so fly in face of facts.
14) Defense claim their executorship, (obtained fraudulently) could have helped in Discovery is vexing. Medical records, due process, would show Vera’s state of mind, and how well I calmed her down and made her happy, force honesty or trial.
15) The will from 94 had stipulations for ages over ten years ago. A real will would have mentioned a farm.
16) People are too scared and impaired to discuss this.
17) The scope is whether my siblings and others can be honest, in face of threat, and psychology.
18) What is capable of influencing judges, commerce, law enforcement, lawyers, banks? The Democratic Party, Frank Hague’s legacy, with lower orders of oppression, prostitution. This is what I have to look into, for them, and the people.
19) I will show the link between higher power and totalitarianism, how that is reasoning relief to crime.
20) Summary Judgment, negated a declaratory May 4 order for mediation? They are 14th amendment violations, when state deprive protected rights and immunities.
21) The cause of errors: too much judicial discretion, concentration of too much power in too few, sex trade.
22) Sandusky is in a schizophrenic state of denial, and critically not apologizing, because such moral steps would take him closer to revealing the culture of pedophilia. Crime, like addiction, seems comes with a culture of many.
23) A jury would see the suspicious story, harmful and calculated.
24) Vera relied on my guidance, shown here, and wanted me to guide family more.
25) Mr. Garvin, who advised on the will signing and probate, PA 131 never gave me the due process of any explanation or face questions. Mark and Veronica sadly have denied me any due process of honest serious on the level discussion.
26) This is because people are made. The Kingdom of God is real. People are easily made to be something, a long time. There is no choice. And what is done, so low, and aimed against, harmful psychologically.
27) This metaphysic invested in the negative now, has to understand we are interested in its interest.
28) Mark is not a capable fiduciary or disinterested trustee called for.
29) Vera’s murder, and how my family went and goes along with it, as well, as obstructive, lying treatment of me, who is trying to help, is crime; yet I am trying to resolve and reform it, civilly. Atheism does not explain this.
30) Defense never shared much requested Discovery, and lie, about me, their clients, and Vera, fundamentally, particularly, calculatedly.


Due Process, Recovery, Healing
Due Process in Civil Court: Honest, Civil, Respectful discussion of issues. Not punishment, but figuring out what to do, recognizing no one wants to do bad, that there are serious issues here, that this involves many people, that we have to work through what went on; and that my spiritual background is helpful. This isn’t even about money, but reform. Mark and Veronica need help to work through, and others, the lives that they have had. Their unpleasant sexual oppression occludes honesty, conscience. This could be widespread. And an opportunity, to sort out what is really going on through due process. There can be wholesale control. and giving up, of lives and dignity; a secret side of, Constitutionalism, we’ve long meant to cure. Vera’s murder, and how my family, and officials, went and go along with it, as well as obstructive, false treatment of me, who is trying to help, is crime, atheism does not explain. I have to get behind this matter, in the interests of good, and find out what happened, because it doesn’t look isolated. Why no one like me has come along, I don’t know; another inquiry. Serious psychological inquiry is needed.

Does It Make Sense?
Could humans do all these bad things? Could we all be controlled by higher power? Totalitarianism defined as ignoring that? How could Journalists, Judges, Lawyers, not have reformed, this, what no one could want. This demonstrates how people are made, how there isn’t serious discussion; people don’t choose this dark route. They didn’t get a life, that’s the psychology to it; you’d rather invest in tragedy, hard and painful to discuss, and yet done for you: That crucible being the lack of discussion of this serious deprivation in the media; which in turn can be brought up through discussion here. Too many people are too easily roped in, for it to be explained ignorantly.

Any widespread culture of oppression, shocking as it is, has to be protected by police; and this is where Monell may be used to prosecute municipal abuse of law. Monell v. Department of Social Services308 holds that local governments may be liable for damages, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief, whenever “the action that is alleged to be unconstitutional implements or executes a policy statement, ordinance, regulation, or decision officially adopted and promulgated by that body’s officers. Moreover . . . local governments . . . may be sued for constitutional deprivations visited pursuant to government ‘custom’ even though such a custom has not received formal approval through the body’s official decision-making channels.”

Article 1:1 N.J. Constitution
Among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness.” This was denied my mother. I pursue it. Is it hollow? Look at the wink of Defense brief to you.

There are many genuine issues. There have been false affidavits. Rule 4:50 that fraud is basis for new trial. Rule 4:80, to probate where domiciled, statutes, witnesses to will in domiciled county 3b:29. Don’t eschew the eschatological principle of counties taking care of their own; PA Foreign county enables exactly theft. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to just work through this honestly, civilly? Is that too high a bar? Were there any subjective desire for this, it would have been civilly explained to me. Statutes call for inquiry into fraud. Fact-finding, would find verifiers. The court erred in not concerning with medical records, because nurses noted how close and helpful I was to Vera and what a special relationship we had, especially compared to notes on sibling. Any due process shows what’s right, what’s wrong, and what there is to work out. But these apparent enough to signify deeper structural error; Such as how can a Judge, be able to ignore consciously, suspicions, and what magnitude is this grievance, for people? So order talking. Let’s figure and work.

What to Do
Things are tight, we have to consensus an obvious consensus; that something bad is happening that has to be worked out, for which people have to trust the opportunity to talk with me, without fear or insecurity about issues, or confusing fearing truth, with fearing criminals. We can review those issues before initiating honesty. Credibility, defense, my sister and brother are neither free, nor in the right community to talk with me about what really happened in their life; (and their defense lawyer, isn’t immune from his stories, how they happen, how this could be agreed to). Are people too embarrassed by experience, to talk to me? Wouldn’t their embarrassment conduct through others? Obviously not, so questions. The alternative of not talking, seems dangerous for all.

A miscarrying judiciary is the origin

Whether the motion was granted or denied, the standard on appeal for review of the decision on the motion is: The trial court’s decision on such a motion shall not be reversed unless it clearly appears that there was a miscarriage of justice
There are clearly miscarriages of Justice here. For instance, “Generally, where discovery is not complete, summary judgment is not appropriate, at least where it is clear that at least one of the parties still wishes discovery. See, for example, Crip pen v. Cent/ Jersey Concrete Pipe Co., 176 N.J. 397, 409 (2003). But in Liberty Surplus Ins. Co. v. Amoroso, P.A., 189 N.J. 436, 451 (2007), It decides first whether there was a genuine issue of fact. If there wasn’t, it then decides whether the lower court’s ruling on the law was correct. Walker v. Alt. Chrysler Plymouth, 216 N.J. Super. 255, 258 (App. Div. 1987).”
What judge doesn’t see the natural quest for me to account for What judge doesn’t see the natural quest for me to account for an estate whose information I could and did access anytime, through Vera, or the natural volition and preservation of my siblings to either reassure me, or admit the estate is being looted, and you’ve lived a life secret to me that went on without me. Now with me, it will stop?

“The ground in subsection (f) allows vacation for “any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment or order.” For this subsection. Relief is available only when “truly exceptional circumstances are present. “Used “sparingly” and only “in situations in which, were it not applied, a grave injustice would occur.” Housing Auth. of Town of Morristown v. Little, 135 N.J. 274, 274, 286 (1994), quoted in First Morris Bank and Trust v. Roland Offset Service, Inc., 357 N.J. Super. 68, 71 (App. Div. 2003). The appellate court will reverse where that discretion has been abused. Mancini v. E.D.S., 132 N.J. 330, 334 (1993). There were abuses of discretion, grave injustices will and have occurred and truly exceptional circumstances are about.
“Decision on whether to remove a fiduciary, such as a trustee under a will, is addressed to the trial court’s discretion and will not be disturbed on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” Wolosoff v. CSI Liquidating Trust, 205 N.J. Super. 349, 306 (App. Div. 1985).

If a judge makes a discretionary decision, but acts under a misconception of the applicable law, the appellate court need not give the usual deference, exercises of discretion “are entitled to respectful review under an abuse of discretion standard.” Serenity Contracting v. Fort Lee, 306 N.J. Super. 151, 159 (App. Div. 1997).
“To decide if there was a miscarriage, the appellate court defers to the trial court with respect to “intangibles” not transmitted by the record (e.g., credibility, demeanor, “feel of the case”) but other-wise makes its own independent determination of whether a miscarriage of justice occurred. Carrino v. Novotny, 78 N.J. 355, 360 (1979);
“Trial judges must make fact findings that are sufficiently clear and complete to permit review. Otherwise the court will remand, for fact-findings, to the agency (Matter of Vey, 124 N.J. 534, 544 (1991); Matter of Issuance of a Permit, 120 N.J. 164, 173 (1990)), or to the court. If the findings are bad enough and the record sparse, the court may order a whole new trial. Hewitt v. Hollahan, 56 N.J. Super. 372, 382-84 (App. Div. 1959).” What fact-finding? There was no fact found. The transcript PA336 shows Judge Velazquez has no idea Vera was worth 14 million, or that my motions have case law PA269. Even though the transcript references 14 million May 4, 2012., PA 272. He is given a lot of latitude to ignore their lack of credibility, in this sense, like Mark, even though it is obvious, his psychology enables the cahoots of crime, despite common knowledge.

Summary judgment must be granted if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment or order as a matter of law.” R. 4:46-2. But there are many material facts challenged by me.

Why litigate, explain
A widespread powerful conspiracy could admit their power to me. Do they not because to me they have a conscience, but as construed, they don’t? Due process could have already led to this. But Defense Counsel’s nature is not communicative, but about taking over wealth, available via murder; nevertheless, honesty, is the main thing I want. Certainly the first; from there, we have to think, but things calm down, because lying is not impeding thought. I realize they think their control is paramount, yet are they of free will and discussion? And what about simply putting freeing Mark and Veronica or others, on the table?

People behind in Hoboken.
It seems there is an order of ring powerful enough to control law enforcement, lawyers, the judiciary, even commerce; to the nefarious end of murdering Vera Fedorov, and taking her wealth, through the trafficking of her offspring, Veronica and Mark; These means, widespread, applicable. This higher ring looks like the remnant of Frank Hague’s machine. The lower ring maintaining sex trafficking probably has its own circle around New Mexico and Veronica, and around Mark.(There was recently a case linking internet prostitution in N.M. and N.J.) Insofar one ring serves the other may protect it. Hudson County was a critical venue for running this operation. That defense counsel ignores and obscures siblings own interest, might be harder in a county, where Vera and I shared the same household in Princeton on and off, since I fixed up the house from renters in 1996; an experience Mark and Veronica, being married, totally missed, except two months at the end. It would be easier to see the estate is paying for their lawyers, that I outshone them in local schools years ago, and earned respect through agriculture, and local politics. Citing the crime about compels recognition of horrible situation I can lead correction of, as no one else has; through 2a, altering and reforming, benefitting people, freeing from crime within totalitarianism, helping Veronica and Mark.


Who wants to intimidate medical directors? Who can’t talk about what they do? How do we apply and put together, knowledge of higher power? Can that make higher up civil, and discussing? Can the Community, I transmit; replace the courts, even while courts order civil proceedings? Am I and 2a more appropriate to lead this, because the people are community, and the courts, as tighter, closer to this origin? I see safety’s locus in community circles. We do not have safe society, we have some sacrificial design; a media outright and immaterially controlled, and corrupted; whose grace may be given us, or not; the context of the universe, for which there is the kingdom of god; I don’t know. But let us acknowledge, our world is where government, dominates over non-atheism, and where the Judeo-Christian replacement of paganism, wiped out the dialogue sought here. So maybe there is more fear, or ease, than there should be; still Plaintiff hopes the slander and lack of due process signals a point that must be controlled. Can all benefit, like adults, or will that not be allowed a priori? The context of spirituality where we admit our own interests, and recognize the totalitarian facility going on, is important. This might be done, one by one, each by each, through movement of consensus, or threat of judgment, or conference means or any means.

They’re made
Mark and Veronica threaten me, but also are threatened themselves? How real to them, is the threatening world they live in. It exists because they are made. I need to sit with Vern and Mark each and explain to them they are made, that the kingdom of god makes it easy for bad people to be made, and they are just bad people, they had no say in the matter, its higher power determining the way people are made and they are clearly forced. And I think that is the problem in generating honesty. They can’t admit they were made and had no say, but they also can’t admit what they’ve gone through, and that’s important. it’s atrocious, it’s not shame of particular actions, its shame of total control.Incapable,psychologically impaired by life experience, this, not talking, or getting love, going on.

The universe is less, that’s why, the Kingdom of God.
The universe is much less than earth. Yet older and harder and behaving as it does now. Sympathy or a lessening, which is what the Kingdom of God is, is in sync with the universe. Compare, the abundance of earth, and cold poverty of universe; our sensitivity, and outer space. Though Jesus introduces the term, he does not say what causes the kingdom of god nor what design, control and History, it enables. Those of Hebrew descent, may think of it as being made from clay why from clay. So metaphysic, which means relations between parts not necessarily tangible, may be examined, here as a wonderful needed opportunity, concerning Justice.

Rebuttals by Plaintiff
1) Their claim I am not allowed to challenge will, when both statute and case law says otherwise, is not grounded in law, (as is a lot)
2) Their complaint about my letter to show cause as a few days late, ignores good faith, and statute 4:50- about fraud being immune to durations; but most, they merely have to reassure me, or talk honestly. Maybe we have to recognize how truly rare that may be.
3) Their claim transcripts weren’t served properly when, case manager said it was fine they were in appendix.
4) Quoting the judge I’m “Self-serving”. Farmers are not greedy, and am trying to help Mark and Vern, with this, now aware.
5) It’s their job to fess up to lying under oath, according to statute and professional guidelines. With Vera and my grandfather trust gone, no money for estate lawyer, much less crime-concerned, or long-term management.
6) Their claim, PA, 415when a case is dismissed, interlocutory appeals are dismissed with it, is not grounded in law. While interlocutory appeals are consolidated with general appeals, alone, they critically allow the case to go forward as they would cast a mitigating light upon summary or final judgment.
7) Material facts gloss over a suspicious trust, unknown witnesses, that Vera was severely anxious, and that Veronica and Mark have failed to show me they have the money or are in control, so there is little credibility, over several issues, and I have worked full time since 1999, and part time, since 1996, as earlier, there have been no doctors, medications or incidents since February 1993, I filed federal tax returns every year since 1999, on my own. This inference otherwise, they know is not true. I was not on disability benefits before Vera’s downfall, and was bullied into it, afterwards and was qualified, by virtue of four months in St Vincent’s in 1992, and not any current medical diagnosis. There are rules in N.J. about slander, and this, a trailhead to calm.
8) That I waited 7 months to file regarding changing venue, a) I just wanted discovery to see if there were criminals who have taken the money, or Mark and Vern are managing the money; an urgent primary concern. As soon as I saw otherwise, I motioned to change venue. They did the fraud, where is their credibility, they don’t even own up to fraud. They also ignore how I mentioned the wrong venue in the second sentence of the complaint and that the primacy of changing venue wasn’t explained. Shouldn’t their concern be about where the money is, and the eschatological wherewithal of a county looking after its own? They ignored R.4:80, they lied under oath. Defense Counsel are bullies. They denying Hudson County venue didn’t facilitate theft? I could show a jury how contrary to professional conducts rules. By just beginning now, I hope we see how more things can be brought up. I essentially did not get a fair court in Hudson County, and that is the main of changing venue. Moreover, I can see why assignment judges are meant to oversee venue hearings. This should have been caught in probate. You can’t justify fraud for this intent, when its design is so obvious. How does an Industry or trade, allow this? Not knowing an old trick of foreign county manipulation?
They claim the will, signified a Hudson domicile. They ignore they lied in claiming Vera had an apartment in Hoboken, and that she hasn’t had an apartment in Hoboken since 1992. The will was drafted two years before I returned to and fixed up the house in Princeton in 1996, which had been run down by renters who eliminated our mortgage, and by the end of 1998, they were gone, and my mother and I were relying on it as a resource and household in our peripatetic lives. This return to Princeton, for we all abandoned the house by 1990, by my mother and I that lasted till her death was a powerful bond my siblings did not share with her, being married, and with children.
9)Their claim they have no obligation to account for the bulk of Vera’s wealth…if they can’t reassure me, then there is something very suspicious going on. If the will is fraudulent, then so are the entire assets transfer. Anything Vera gave them, before she died, or in her lifetime, they should be transparent about, that’s just good business, and trustworthy, and bankable and legal civil. I was unaware of particulars of any transfer from Vera to her offspring before she died, though they were represented as percentages in her schema; and was made aware that assets were being transferred as she was injured, to avoid taxes, and so in good faith, at least, to say nothing of reassuring my dark fears, these accounts should be shared, in this matter. Due process is about justice. If something’s up, lay it on the line, don’t lie.
10) Their financial narrative is something I’ve always wanted counsel about; Vera was trying to merge three LLC;s into one, and operate out of Florida; but that never precipitated; that is my narrative, and I add to that, I think Vera got to know them more and more, as 2010 was the most either had worked with Vera in many years, and she saw I was the respectable one, and had a will with me in charge; for which they attacked as planned, somehow, and from there, the mind frame is never the same, upon this alleged additional duress.
11)This expectation of proof from me is again, not grounded in law, nor reasonable jury trial. Reducing furthering criminal oppression, and its occupation with overcoming its blind obedience, tactically, compels some compliance from courts to facilitate some initiation of honesty and trust, from which a lot of good will benefit, and crime reduce.
12)What is the big deal about helping me get medical record, if you have the interests of my family? What is defense counsel covering?

Judgment and Individual Stories, Reform, Wanted
All the people I know, in this, and all the people they know, all have some story, that is beyond some known human character, and therefore hidden, as well as not really sensible or humane.
They need compassion, to overcome the psychology of giving in to bad people, and not helping. People close to people, family, has the unique opportunity for evil to get close to someone, and the nature of many institutions, insensible towards liberating truth. Judgments may force talking, consensus and conference and general admission, as well, the recognition of this vehicle to wholesale reform, also. Can Murder, controlled oppression, silence, widespread means, compel the consensus, we need to talk honestly, and Spirituality and Reform, public benefit, better justice, less oppression, a better earth

Honesty and Due Process, in Civil Court

February 26, 2013

Motion for CASP or Pre-Argument Conference
To Court:
It is obvious Defense is lying, and they have to work with me, as honesty and civil recourse, cure. There are RICO violations here; but the principle of civil due process, is destructive nature deep down, wants to go straight. I am not an atheist. Justice and Peace, requires Truth. And truth here predicated on a divinity, faith will examine in CASP or Pre-argument conference; the opportunity for natural honest consideration of this absolutely destructive situation of pedophilia and prostitution rings, ability to control judges, and widespread oppressive conspiracy: Things one couldn’t clearly desire. Settlement, predicated on Honesty, Honesty, aimed at reform, is vital to due process. Spiritual vitality may be explained in pre-argument conference. Criminal nature has avoided parley. I facilitate my motion for settlement or issue conference with material facts of issues involved we would discuss in resolving the matter. PA 94,363,180

Options, thinking, examined, as family, concerned citizens, seeing Truth, with some greater divinity of good will in the dark universe. The oppressed lack the community honesty requires, and a connection to universal good. Many were a positive part of my life. What happened? Settlement explains, and entertains the option to unify or help, oppressed.. A critical mass of care and concern and community, is essential to turn Mark (and others) to honesty, options, security. Raising a Scope and Decision protective of siblings, could join me in recovering money and rectifying the situation. They do not have the capacity to manage their affairs without me. Recognize my guardian-nature, with the right to cure tragedy, civil court intends. Again, the problem, that this is widespread, is also the solution. Opportunity, balance and heals, the Tragic.
Whatever impedes the natural and necessary sensible conversation that should have flowed from this scenario, in other people, doesn’t flow through me. I want to discuss the issues, a real need and relief. Settlement is based in Honesty: Civil Court, a mandate, for Honest Resolution: A basic point, opposing counsel never demonstrated, managing the scope and decision, in the interests of Mr. Garvin and the monitors and enforcers of my family and friends, and others, CASP or pre-argument conference may remedy.

There has been so little honest dialogue that we haven’t looked into the honor of the state in this matter, for instance, in discounting my leadership and protecting criminals, or originating crime. Is lack of apology due to the will of higher design, or sexual abuse has so hurt them; or is the point of totalitarianism, release upon understanding? In which case, healing grows from avoiding bad influence. We must show them, their immorality. Let them help.

The matter happened so easily, because society is imposed upon The Kingdom of God. Working through these issues, requires getting there.

It is not just Mark and Veronica, but the people behind them, and government whom the piths of issues resolve benefits They have not negotiated because no judge pointed out to them what they seem. My safety and others, is a compelling concern perhaps better broached through conference, than Judge. Honesty is the condition for civil settlement right? Is Honesty the condition for Civil Court? Is their control of Mark and others, judges, so tight? Indeed, is the hurt of being forced, in totalitarian society, keeping them from apology, and is this in harmony with a metaphysical control of Earth? Do we have a vehicle that gets us closer to a truth, and the truth providing perspective upon tragedy? (Per grounding in harmful sexual deviance, treated with twelve steps, over the enforcement).

Mark’s and his culture’s experience, may have halted his communication here, yet the mystery is how so much communication by so many is halted? CASP or pre-argument conference regarding, can provide the communication missing. If Hiding behind the courts shows the courts and jurisdiction precipitate solution, a future.

Vic Fedorov Appellant Pro Se
219 Yardville-Allentown Rd
Yardville N.J. 08620
201 232 1154


1 Overview
1 Procedure
5 Material Facts
9 Immunity and third party liability
11 Paragraph 2a
12 1rst, 10th amendment, totalitarianism
12 Safety, Honesty
12 Pedophilia, Addiction
13 Terror
13 Defense Decisions
13 My Siblings Interest
13 Criminals
14 Sacrificial Design
14 Atheism a Mistake
14 Societal Context to Crime


I have always simply sought honesty and good faith in this matter of Vera’s estate and death. Being unable to achieve such, forced me to go to court; Denied such, and Discovery, in Lower Court, CASP conference, and/or pre-argument conference to review complex issues, may achieve what I seek.

Widespread conspiracy, corruption, requires reform. Suffering, and oppressing actors – who can desire such life? The Kingdom of God, both reassures us, and shows, why and how this tragedy exists.

Hiding behind the courts, and criminal nature, the defense, has not mediated at all, resisted my leadership and trust.

Mark’s psychological state, the guardian nature to my regaining family, safety, a reasonable future, were neither apprehended, nor concerns, of Defense Counsel, and Judges.


Since 2005 I made a full time commitment to the trade, of Organic Growing, through my small business, and other farms. Vera was a quadriplegic at the bottom of the stairs of her house in Princeton, the night of August 17th 2010, and discovered there Friday 4:15pm. It was disturbing that since Veronica had lived there with her family since that, June, only moving to Hoboken on Aug 15th, and Mark managed with her in Hoboken 5 properties, they did not call her nearby friends, concerned. I immediately came from working a farm in NY State; and was by her side, including nights, 40-80 hours a week until February. We were very close, and I had helped her for years and months with business, household, personal and travel matters. Now anxious and traumatized, I would calm her down at Kessler Institute for spinal research, as records would show. She passed March 22, 2011, in other suspicious circumstances, at Princeton Hospital, in the early morning when Veronica was visiting her.

May 15th and May 22nd, 2011, Mark showed me a trust document allegedly signed by Vera July 20th 2010, which I was unaware of, and a will, drafted in 1994, signed by her Oct 7 2012, with no lawyer signature, and the two witnesses, hospital administrators, not credible friends we know.

Both documents slanderously alleged I was mentally ill, which everyone knows is not true, or the way we related. I had no incidents, complaints, medications, or doctors, since 1993, and even then Dr. Lyndahl of St Vincent, explained to Vera, the issue was expressing hard ideas, not mental illness. I had jobs, like substitute teaching and bakery work, then worked full time for Vera from June 1999 to the fall of 2003, renovating and passing buildings by inspection, in Easton, and then, in her Hoboken office and Manhattan apartment. In 2003 and in 2004, I ran for local office on a popular platform of making local decisions with ayes and nays in peaceful assembly, and then filed a federal question asking in local officials violated the tenth amendments reservation of powers to the state or the people, and abridged peaceful assembly. 04-366 Judge Thompson. I also petitioned for a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court regarding a model for retaining rights by meeting certain requirements. Also a state case that publishing some police blotter, is cruel and unusual punishment. Then I made a very respectable six year commitment to organic agriculture, five of them in jersey..

This is the opposite of mentally ill. Vera respected the challenges I took on. We shared friends, households, 4 poodles, food, travel, to Greece, and winter stays at her house in Sanibel Florida. Then she loved I was a small businessman and was developing a wonderful trade, and the vegetables I would give her on my Thursday night deliveries to Manhattan restaurants. We shared workers. Mental illness wasn’t an issue. I was respected and looked up to for my hard work, popular management style, dignity, as she called it, and my hiking, biking travel and friends. I had funds from a trust my grandfather left me, since taken away or “consolidated”, worth 80,000, income and resources from agriculture, and from working for Vera.

Documents casting me as mentally ill, without a vote in the business, access to funds, or work in Hoboken, was an unexpected disturbing terror; Now I saw her injury was not an accident, and I think upon returning from the beach that Wednesday night, she drank something with a knockout drug in it, and people were hiding in the house and threw her down the stairs after hitting her on the head with a hammer, for which there was a mark on the top of her head. That Veronica and Mark could slander me, knowing me, my reputation, signaled a new tragic world.

I have been fought and stolen from in life before and the protagonists routinely apologized and made peace. But months passed, and no conscience rose, so in November I filed a letter to show cause. They probated in Hudson County violating R.4:80 and the principle of a county taking care of one’s own, lying Vera had an apartment pa and spent nights in Hoboken, that she was of sound mind, and not restrained, when on three strong medications and paralyzed from breast down, lying under oath to probate, with false documents. PA196 202-206 probate Up to the first hearing in January 2012, I repeatedly asked for some accounting to reassure me things were on the up and up, and repeatedly unpleasantly was rejected in that request. All I ever wanted was honesty, and to care about my family, as Vera did, and she did. Obviously now, there were criminals my siblings needed rescuing from. They are not that distinguished, couldn’t, wouldn’t do this on own.

Judge, Docket, would find whether things were right, or money stolen. But discovery accounted for 2.5 of the 8 million in mutual funds I know, and the monthly revenues and costs of five Hoboken properties never shared. Nor her tax returns or email correspondence; and her friends and co-workers don’t respond to me. Lower Court afforded no inquiry into suspicions. Lack of discovery generally precludes summary judgment. My action was not seen as guardian-like; Defense and Judge alliance against Mark and Veronica.

Fulfill my goal of honest discussion, negotiation, examination and consideration, of what truly to do, within this domain and range, for the class action quality of oppression through oppression of family by criminals hiding behind law enforcement and judiciary, are wide-ranging, prededential concerns. Let my spiritual way apply, through CASP or pre-argument conference to reduce simple issues or review of complex issues: In truth they have provided nothing to go on with them. CASP or pre-argument justifies a fundamental attendance.

I pleaded from the onset PA13-27 my siblings were blackmailed, extorted, coerced, corrupted and monitored, that their oppression had to have gone on decades, they need help, in devastating long term tragedy. Isolated, is this realistic? This oppression has spread or intensified to people who know, I could help, united. Judge Velazquez did not reflect any faith in my concern and care. Like mandatory pretrial federal rules, appellate conference, in judicial ageist, may regain my family, others, healing, recovering, and making peace and reforming conditions that generated this. If my siblings and others are held back by pedophilia, or secret gay conduct; if they are not honest, they cannot get a grip, and continue vulnerable to exploitation. Lying is a prerequisite to this totalitarian oppression.

With conference, we can proceed with honesty and clarity to examine options, feel the conscience, and decide what to do, in this dangerous, harmful culture. The interests of my brother and sister are clearly not in lying to me. 4) R.26 Statutes, They are not capable of managing these affairs, the scope and decisions, ignores my desire for peace, extenuating circumstance and other liable parties. Ron Fraoili acts in the interests, of Mr. Garvin, and criminals unknown, not my siblings, and merely hides behind the judiciary. Conference should consider the means and lies that oppress and exploit my family, as applied elsewhere as well, not the least upon The Judiciary. R-26-2a, (pb7), does condition upon Mark and Veronica constitute mental incapacitation?. R.P.C. 1.6 Lawyers can’t permit fraud. 3B1-2 Mental incapacitation is inability to manage one’s own affairs. Pb12

1) CASP is to resolve simple issues, impeding resolution; and pre-argument conference to work on the harder and metaphysical issues.
2) The principle of honesty, good faith, civil resolution, in context of manifest corrupt culture, should unite family, and focus on the future. Dishonesty threatens Safety; Communication prevents further tragedy.
Honest Communication has been most needed, and denied. How?
3) Where was the principle, civil court allows honesty, without fear, in absence of government prosecution, to resolve conflict? Given the small point nature of government investigation, reducing crime through civil court is the point of due process, and Justice.
4) Lack of discovery infers, we should focus on recovering what was stolen through murder and exploitation of family. If I had any sense the money was in Mark’s hands and management, I would not pursue this litigation. I am trying to protect him.
5) How does Defense hide behind a crooked judiciary? What are the means? Admit you are exploiting my siblings and have my people, who, united, could reform causes of these conditions. You have to admit this to be civil in due process, settlement mitigates past destruction. A professional talks about their experience, not the out of control. This is the breach, civil due process heals.
6) Do my siblings, crooked in-laws, (friends, co-workers and family and oppressors) apprehend these issues? Where does the calm apprehension start? Where is the opportunity, to order Civil Resolution? To relieve the pressure and duress?
7) The merit of discussing how extensive and meant is the addressed culture, as condition for settlement, is undeniable. The Kingdom of God, is susceptible to the influence of impositions of Society.
8) Can my siblings decide if they want to help me recover the losses, and I need to hear an objection, or consider it consensus.
9) How does this break? How protected is the right to safety? To learn the score without threat? Was there neighborhood buggery? Did our local Princeton schools enable wider abuse? Is Veronica’s psychological state caused by Prostitution? Was Mark abused young? Does he suffer physical and mental effects therein, from coercive treatment for servicing the powerful? What are nature and treatments and gauge upon others?
10) Is Mr. Garvin a pimp, (our tax lawyer), protected by powerful people prone to pedophilia, because they can treat adults like children? If there is widespread, secret gay, pedophilia and prostitution traffic, how can they not tell me? What if marriages were ordered? Learning of this, towards the benefit of the people, would be a condition for settlement, because I don’t think anyone clearly thinking wants it, and is the manifestation of higher power through immoral form of society.
11) Do they, and you, understand lying about behavior occludes thinking, relation, morality; causes vulnerability, exploitation, dysfunction?
12) Where is their concern for Lena, Alex, Theasa, Serge, Jean, Ian, Stephen, Irinia, Connie, The Garcias, Alan, Ginadi, Valya, me? Is the lack of morality, the psychological oppressive effect of pedophilia and prostitution, without Remedy?
13) Is schizophrenia caused by amazing breaks from morality by Subjects? Because their culture elaborately deceives? Deception for Marriage, Crime for Enlightenment, double lives?
14) Settlement offers the unique condition for discussion of exactly how The Kingdom of Heaven does this? What psychological relief.
15) Without honesty, I can’t move, return to farming, be safe.
16) Can my family apprehend, whatever, conferencing will help other oppressed people too? Benefit Safety?
17) As does apprehending the kingdom of god, bodies being. This perspective of truth, in totalitarianism, with greater resonance and relevance from judiciary, than other forum, disputes free will, shows the Kingdom of Heaven, as exculpating operator.
18) The acceptance of their children being near, sexual abuse crime requires a therapeutic dialogue, in errant culture.
19) For Journalists, and society would have reformed these natures, were there free will. This relieves oppressors. Totalitarianism festers in Ignorance, Secrecy.
20) If so many cards, are truly controlled, why no civil negotiation? Because civil negotiation, apprehends immorality, objectively.
21) Can N.J.’s Constitution 2a, right of people to reform government, apply here to compel conference?
22) If pedophilia, sexual secrecy, causes silence, what remedies avail? Can anyone consciously want pedophilia? Is it a means? Address the causes of crime. Did these retarded morals cause Vera’s murder? People know, you know. The absence of treatment and exposure is a totalitarian context of higher power. Is great pain behind it? Purer foolishness? A mere story? Justice, reduces Crime, requires Truth.
23) Metaphysics, a complex issue, I’d like to conference with Defense, the sacrificial nature of totalitarian government, judiciary, exigent through Constitutional Structure Crime can hide behind: having replaced Community; and defects punishing.
24) This deprivation is under the color of law, making it pursuant to title 42 Section 1983 violation, and judicial conference participation.
Dialogue would come from its origination, the courts. The courts, not community, are the core of conflicts.
25) The dualistic nature I try to describe can be handled peacefully by the honest, but is destructive through liars. Pedophilia is grounded in fooling children and hurt from coercion related to unidentified dualism.
26) Per Safety, and Reform, Settlement, I need to know the interaction between the people behind Mark and Veronica, and Law Enforcement.
27) Is there a federal jurisdiction to these issues? U.S.C. 28 section 1367 may suggest so through the questioning the judicial constitutional structure. Or this may be considered a novel and complex issue of state law, per state constitution. There has been a wholesale class action denial of due process through state infrastructure. Judges, like Velazquez and Leo, the Surrogate Judge, should accede to the primacy of such admission. 1983 “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;” The Monroe Court determined acting under the color of law, is similar to bad law. The 14th amendment protects against state wrongs. Implied in “Jurisdiction” is particular government having a say.
28) Can history or metaphysics be reformed through this jurisdiction? Does 2a conduct remedy? Pursuant 2. a. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.


Immunity and Third Party Liability
Considering options in conference may involve discussion of Immunity and Third Party Liabilities.

“DeShaney” recognizes an affirmative, “duty to protect”, when government is custodial. There is likely an ongoing looting and plunder of the inheritance, while the matter was officially attended by courts. Rather than protecting the estate, the lower court, over the year, has most likely allowed its depletion to oppressors, conscious abetting of crime. And the harm includes the continued oppression and threat to my family and co-workers and friends of Vera. While “DeShaney” focuses on protecting inmates, it has been applied to due process claims arising in two contexts: Plaintiff in functional custody of state when harmed. The court, and government, failed to protect property, through Surrogate Judge Leo of Hudson County, who enabled probate fraud and false venue, and much more, Judge Velazquez of lower court, who succeeded Judge Olivieri.

The second context is if the state created or increased the danger to which plaintiff was exposed; and as I doubt this crime and others, could have been planned without the intention of hiding behind courts, danger has been created and increased through state behavior. This rises to class action. And its true cause, a constitutional structure concentrating judicial power in a few; means only a few need be controlled by organized crime. There are RICO qualities here, widespread conspiracy. So conference incurs discussion of state liabilities as well. Deprivation, crime, enabled by color of law, (officials empowered by law) Monroe, Supreme Court, are pursuant to U.S.C. section 1983, and resistant to dismissal.

Judge Souter wrote when a plaintiff challenges a “specific act of a governmental officer” rather than legislation, he must show it “shocks the conscience”. Now the matter here is criminal outright. Velazquez and Olivieri, and Leo, enabled, consciously, abetting looting a 14 million inheritance, and murder, and oppression, including prostitution, pedophilia, terror. This shocks the conscience: Vera, was paralyzed, then murdered, and it went through her two children she loved. Are these officials a liable third party, defense?. 07. County of Sacramento, 118 S. Ct. at 1717. Justices Kennedy and O’Connor in concurring opinion, suggest, “the reasons the Court gives in support of its judgment go far toward establishing that objective considerations, including history and precedent, are the controlling principle, regardless of whether the State’s action is legislative or executive in character.”

Objective Consideration, means Jurisdiction, recognizing interests, correcting wrong, guiding proper orders.

An accused official, implicates a system, showing Judicial Discretion, and Concentration of Power, enables what shocks the conscience. Law itself, construed as replacing frequent community meeting that resolved conflict in earlier times, may shock the conscience. So while I can blame a judge, the judge can blame the constitution, as a design whose structure lends a side to form and enable a culture of crime through franchising and isolating an exclusive, thus vulnerable, Judiciary and Law Enforcement. And the corporation of government, could theoretically, confer a third party liability upon the ignorance of the people and news media and education, which party could then blame the creation of The Kingdom of God, metaphysically. Judicial discussion of this metaphysic, being near the top of societal pyramid, and prestigious, will ramify benefits, not lower orders. This is an attack on totalitarianism through the Judiciary, in self-defense.

Does a Constitution emphasizing Law, not Community, originate this culture, where Criminals and Law and Officials merge with conspiracy? Judge Payne’s denial of my emergent motion for the assignment judge to hear the motion to change venue, when the point of probate fraud be to ensure worse judge by foreign county was not supervisory, nor was Judge Nugents denial of the interlocutory appeal to inquire into obvious probate fraud under oath.Pa416, 231, 240. Reform the concentrated nature of the judiciary and law enforcement, so Crime cannot rule, by controlling a few. Study Judicial Forms, from the Jersey Plan, to Tribunes, to Druids, to engaging lawyers.

If officials or criminals fear repercussions of past behavior, Buckley v. Fitzsimmons: “Absolute Immunity is necessary only when there is interference with….conduct closely related to the judicial process”. Reform, not punishment, is the divinity here. Recovery and peace, is helped by my working with Veronica and Mark. Justice.

Paragraph 2a
When the state, claims a sovereign immunity to challenges, it fails authority grounded in responding to challenges. My Citizenship is more fit for this challenge of reform, than the implicated state, and this status transferred through paragraph 2a of The New Jersey Constitution. I should have the means offered by government. The state’s participation in conference is implied by jurisdiction.. 2. a. All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it. Altering and reforming government through this matter, intentionally mandates compliance.

The First, Tenth Amendment, Totalitarianism
If we look to a secure, peaceful future, attack the causes not symptoms of crime, in this matter, the widespread conspiracy, would be fueled by local officials of Hudson County. Local officials are neither state nor people, so violate the tenth amendment’s reservations of power, and Peaceful Assembly, is abridged, when a few local elect make decisions, that per bill of rights, are intended for local peaceful assemblies. Thus the problem of municipal corruption, precipitates from unconstitutional structure. The rejection of this reformation that would help all, by Judge Thompson 04-366, district of N.J., is an example of totalitarianism.

Safety, Honesty, The Importance of Knowing the Score
This is about safety. Mark is not honest with me, or reasonable. I need honesty to ascertain safety, a Supreme Court Criteria. Can Defense, widely, not fear criminal prosecution? Is there a general widespread psychological impairment here, is Ignorance, at fault? Judges? Other victims of Pedophilia Culture, gain from Honesty as well. Victims of Hudson County, Hoboken, Judicial Oppression, too. Pimps may give in to Spirituality, but how high does this climb? Can I win on the facts without this vital communicative opportunity, and survive? If Safety was a concern, community would come together. Sandusky is in schizophrenic denial from terror of revealing the pedophilia culture.

Pedophilia May be Treated as Addiction
Stimulation from elaborate lies, and destruction, denial, pedestrian; pedophilia is a like addiction. It may be near the root of our problems, and caused by concentrating power, impairing the psychology of authority. This conference would benefit the people, and reform, wide-ranging, precedential.

If they don’t show me accounting and reassuring documents, it’s logical to assume my siblings are terrorized. The plausibility of threats and fear, upon their behavior make this difficult.

Defense decisions
Do they have a choice, if they want to work with me to reform conditions? Can lawyers be aware of criminal behavior in their firm, involving their clients? Is this due process? Seeing options requires Conference, Jurisdiction. R.P.C. Rules, pb13, (report crime, don’t lie)

My Siblings Interest
Mark and Veronica seem to have money stolen through them. They do not seem to manage this affair and incapacitated. If they worked with me, we could work together and make things better. But I think they are psychologically damaged good, who have been exploited by their lawyers this whole time. Can a conference gain them to me? Are we in danger? 4:26 ScopePA4. If there are children and others oppressed, corrupted, fearful, there is compunction to resolve that. Conference may explain this to Mark and Veronica. Their lawyer does not have their interest. They are blackmailed, extorted, scared, and used. Deprivation of Community compounds these lies. Their situation can reveal it is more common. This is compelling, redeeming, applicable all around.

There are criminals
There are criminals, and corrupted, and oppressed behind my siblings and the court; to reach and help reason, from out of control destructive behavior, to calm, security; through spirituality, Christian terminology; by talking with those affected by these matters and conditions. So far, no one who knows, works with me. With conference, closure. If you see the Kingdom of God, you see the Kingdom of Heaven controls everything. Those pimping, controlling, in said power, need to feel true relief. I hope the court assents to and guides this goal and mission of resolution. For now, structure maintains crime. Velazquez would know the more culpable behind him. Treat causes not symptoms of crime. Conference could involve the judicial perspective. Without the way of the judicial branch, this crime and others would not have been attempted. Thus a structure of local officials and the judiciary enable a vortex crime hides behind. Judicial interest, Justice is invested in this structural examination.

Sacrificial Design
This admittedly pagan explanation, says the follies of History and Society, insures a sacrifice enabled through the creation of The Kingdom of God. This is a metaphysic, judicious discussion may effect, real opportunity. Why sacrificial design, why covert through unsafe society and history? Can we change it? What would it involve? This is what attends Crime.

Atheism is a Mistake
I have shown enough how Atheism is not viable remedying society, indeed it enables sacrifice. Justice requires truth, Atheism is not truth, the still bodies of the kingdom of god can be shown to prove this liberation, and requires trust and respect. This must be seen to move forward. Atheism and Totalitarianism, Ignorance, go together. Justice requires Truth.

Societal Context to Crime
How have people not come forth or united? We can’t blame criminals for their particular will, when we don’t blame everyone for a common insensible will. The context for crime is not free society; but a regulated, limiting society, totalitarianism, as an effect of higher power, metaphysic.

Rainbow rappin America’s Dream

January 20, 2013

Now, some people know this, others don’t: The rainbow family of living light, has a long standing, decree, discouraging alcohol at the 2 week gatherings in different national forests, warm months. I say this is because marijuana merchants, consistent with sacrament promotion, consistently confuse alcohol as a competing market-infringing product, and have influenced so, the wax mind of the rainbow. The grower, being of more material comfort, is disposed to the symbiosis.

The natural law, tribes seek, as opposed to codification; understands the principle of not depriving others of rights. United States Section Code Title 42 Section 1983, says as much; that people are liable, if they deprive others of rights, especially through color of codification; Thus the rainbow, “discourages”; adhering to the principle, that rights and liberty, are confined to not hurting others; certainly one drinking alone quietly is not harmful to others. An analogy:  the way one’s use of one’s own property, isn’t really hurting others. Yet large loud parties, do harm neighbors; as does abusive behavior. And one person or corporation, building on many properties, for many people, in the same way, harms all, in 0f the way merely being concerned about yourself, doesn’t harm others. As a tribe, the rainbow is about people not getting hurt. In the old times, there were tribal, and are, tribal lands. They shouldn’t be called reservations, but tribal land.

There is a violated natural law with the decree, Rap 107. First of all, here is an example of some of the raps.

“Rainbow Gathering E-Text Miniature Manual – Page 1 (of 6)

Welcome Home!

The Rainbow Family of Living Light welcomes you to our family gathering. A place where people co operate not compete.

Each year the family holds the Gathering of the Tribes, a totally Free non-commercial sharing of our lives and sacred hearts, in the Cathedral of Nature for the healing of the earth.

There is no authoritarian hierarchy here. It works because each of us takes the responsibility to make it work. Part of that responsibility is a pledge we keep to each other :

  • we pledge to respect and care for each other in all things
  • we pledge to drop all forms of violence in our relations with each other
  • we pledge to deal with each other up front and with open hearts.



Recent councils have reaffirmed original consensus that the gathering of the tribes is intended as an opportunity to experiment with different ways of living. For this reason and others we ask that firearms, radios, tape decks, electric lights, sound amplification equipment, chainsaws, and power tools be left at home. All vehicles stop at the parking lot or bus village.


Beware of people who say things like, “I’m in charge!” We are All leaders of the rainbow. The dishes get done and crappers get dug because We see to it personally.”

Then it goes on, ”

Main Gate

When you volunteer for main gate you get to see it all come in. Parking crew keeps the roads open and gate crew greets the world with hugs and info. Main gate is where new gatherers first see RAP 107 (Read and Heed!). All weapons and alcoholic beverages stop here. All forms of intoxication can be harmful to the spirit of our gathering. Main gate is where newcomers learn that, in terms of ideas, they are about to enter “Liberated Territory”.


Once you have helped a silent forest glade become a bustling volunteer kitchen that serves thousands of nutritious Free meals and becomes a silent glade again you will know what they mean when someone tells you magic did it! Each person needs their Own cup, bowl, and spoon. Wash buckets, including a bleach dip prevents the spread of disease.


Center for Alternative Living Medicine. In this wounded world many of our family come to the gathering in need of healing. CALM provides free health care, healing workshops, a woman’s center, an herbal apothecary, and counseling to all in need. Look for the large tents. Healers of all kinds are invited to join the staff!


also later on, it goes on



Normal camping stuff (this varies depending on “how” you camp):

  • Sleeping bag/hammock, blanket, tent/tarp, toilet paper/paper towels.
  • Check the weather: rain gear, appropriate clothes, etc…
  • PLATE, CUP or BOWL, and SPOON: this will be your food dish. You will eat out of it so this is VERY IMPORTANT. Biodegradeable soaps and stuff.
  • WATER, WATER, WATER, and more WATER: Drinkable water is a very precious comodity. If you can hike some in… or bring some to the lot and ask for some help to hike it you will make many people happy. Pretty much all you get to drink at Rainbow gatherings is water coffee and tea. If you don’t like coffee or tea, you may want to bring powdered drink mix (with the sugar already added).
  • Sweets (especially chocolate).
  • Fruits and Vegetables. Bring extra if you can to donate to the kitchens.
  • Tools if you can (i.e. knife, axe, saw) There will always be firewood that needs cuttin’.
  • Musical instruments (non-electrical)
  • Poetry

!!! DO NOT BRING !!!

Alcohol: Near the parking area there is a place called

“A-camp”. Rainbow says We love the alcoholic, but not the alcohol.” Personalities change on alcohol (and hard drugs). Sometimes people can’t control themselves as well. Therefore you are respectfully asked to leave the alcohol in A-camp when you hike in to the main gathering space.

  • Aggressive dogs
  • Bad attitudes
  • Hard drugs: Rainbow discourages the use of hard drugs of any kind. Rainbow also discourages the ABUSE of any drugs of any kind.
  • Radios: Also more welcome in A-camp.
  • Guns: Never really welcomed at a gathering.

Please understand that all of these suggestions are “agreed” upon by consensus. No one is specificaly bound to these

decisions. You are asked however to respect the space of others and the rights of those who _did_ agree to consensus.

With thanks to the hundreds of contributors who wrote this book.

Original Issue June '87
Revised Summer '88 Reconsensed Sprint '89 FAQ created Spring '95
E-Texted Collated Spring '95

Obligatory Disclaimer: I do not speak for Rainbow; I speak only for myself. And that said, COPY FREELY!

Rainbow Gathering E-Text Miniature Manual – Page 6 (of 6)

This Rainbow Mini-Manual is intended to introduce newcomers to the basic technique of “Gathering”. It Does Not represent the last word on any subject! The contents of this booklet are designed to “Evolve” with the family and not to become any form of “bible”. We can do this by basing its contents on the consensus of our councils and by changing those contents as the consensus changes.


There is also this following, which specifically, discourages alcohol, but only discourages, saying nothing, the mini manual says, about no alcohol getting past front gate. This discouragement tone, is generally what is referenced.


Rap 107

Gathering Consciousness

Please protect this Beautiful Land.

Walk softly. Harm no living thing. Harmonize – Blend in. Cut no living trees. Use only down, dead wood. Preserve the meadows; camp in the woods. We are caretakers of this land.

Everyone sharing makes a strong Human Tribe!

Please Protect the water sources by staying out of DELICATE spring areas. Avoid camping, peeing, washing above spring areas. Keep ALL soap out of streams, springs or the creek! Use a bucket to take your bath 100 feet away from any water source. To be certain of drinking water, boil it!

Protect our Health!

Use the slit trenches or covered latrines – cover your paper & waste with ashes or lime, wash hands.  Dig no shitters near water areas or kitchens. Break the fly/illness connection: shit > flies > food > YOU!

Use your own cup, bowl & spoon. Wash them after eating and rinse in bleach water. Visit C.A.L.M. if you are injured or if you feel ill – especially if you have a contagious disease!

Camp Together – Establish neighborhoods. Community Fires only! ~ Each with 5 gallon water bucket and shovel for Fire Protection. If you are the last to leave a fire PUT IT OUT! Watch your gear: Be Responsible ~ “Tempt Not Lest Ye Be Lifted From.”

Pets are discouraged but if you must bring them keep them fed, on a leash and out of the kitchens, springs, & fights. Clean up their shit. Love them.


Cleanup begins when you arrive. Bring in only what is necessary. There is no janitor here … you are the cleanup crew. Separate garbage for recycling. Don’t litter – Find collection point. Compost in pits only.

You are the Gathering! Participate in Shanti Sena, the peace keepers – and all activities, councils, work crews, workshops. Volunteer wherever needed: kitchens, welcome home, firewatch, parking lot, shitter digging, supply, front gate, etc. R-E-S-P-E-C-T your sisters’ & brothers’ energies.

Keep the Balance: Earth, Sky, Trees, Water, & People!

Alcohol is Discouraged, Guns are inappropriate, violence is contrary to the spirit of the gathering. Please take no photographs or videos of people without permission. Discourage drug abuse.

Buying and selling endangers our legal right to be here. The Magic Hat is our bank, donate early to fund our needs. The Magic Hat goes around at mealtime circles and with the Magic Hat Band.

Our power together is many times our power separated.

Enjoy the Rainbow with an open heart and you will see the Vision.

So you see there is an explicit discouragement of alcohol. This disturbs some people. The problem is that no reasons are given for the policies; And no citable recourse exists other than changing consensus in tens of councils.  Not to say discouraging alcohol is a bad coda either. And the rainbows do circle and consensus every day; Yet like our own Constitution, there is no explanation why this is desired, its purpose, or what the alternative is and was? People don’t understand the alternative was a looser knit confederacy of states; people don’t know exactly what the official point is? The real reason for the federal constitution was the alternative of a looser knitted confederacy of states, was more prone to conflict, between, and without. (according to the federalist papers). What is the real reason for discouraging alcohol? Is there one?

Secondly, as there is no real recourse current to change constitutions; as a tribes constitution be what they go forth and through; so what is the recourse, to discuss the rap, in the rap section of the rainbow guide, which primarily lists address of rainbows in most states people can stay with passing through, or network an area with? Even the consensus of one circle, can not speak for such broad overarching effective guidelines. Each rainbow council in each of the thirteen regions, each rainbow potluck council, which for instance both New York City and Philadelphia offer once a month, would have to consensus to the same consensus; The Rainbows do not believe in voting, but unaminious consensus. Each has veto power. It takes just one, to stymie the intentions of many.

Likewise who can stand up to the constitution, why did one generation, have the power to legislate for many generations? Shouldn’t there be frequent and several constitutional conventions? Shouldn’t the Constitutional Preamble prefer, we the states, rather than we, the people, insofar the states are natural able forms to check the federal government, not people. Thus both organization, ideals, lack the forms to change themselves, as it stands now.

Now if the reason to discourage alcohol is alcoholism, certainly the alcoholic, is a sorry and destructive agent. Yet we live in an absurd bad world. School, Marriage, The Economy, are likewise destructive agents. No one stands up to the latter. Do people have the capacity for this? Yes people are responsible for their good and bad decisions; and the sicker individuals, take less responsibility for their bad actions; but we can all agree, we control what we do, both good and bad; and yet we can not say we control ourselves regarding School, Marriage, The Economy, or even critically scrutinize them: How can we then expect the alcoholic to scrutinize his behavior?

And yet, if the case is alcoholism, Serenity Tribe, Wharf Rats, have cared about these matters, and have structures to treat alcoholism, and that would be the sole concern.

And yet if the reason is no loud stupid parties, then the guideline would tend to discourage hosting large and or loud campfires and sites;  This would naturally invoke Shanti Sena, as would the daily circles that consensus on such issues; in which case, our form, is basically daily circles dealing with proximate issues, in favor of one time laws, we all favor and promote, without critically refracting. With a more liberal nexus, Shanti Sena would be a broader and more active form; yet there is to be said, that that might be a good thing, and lead to more proactive reform adjunct.

Likewise we have to ask, why do we have a system of police, in America, when Rainbows have the shanti sena system. The Shanti Cena system, is when one person has a problem or issue turning unpleasant, if they yell out, “Shanta Sena” then all around who hear those words, are obligated to come round and help sort out the controversy, or at least look around and make sure others are gathering forth. This translation into American, as the rainbow community is in national forests has to do with establishing each neighborhood with a grid, whereas a person in distress, hits a button compelling, through corresponding communication transmission, people in the surrounding houses, to organize and come by, like ripples where each ripple communicates with further ripples.

By involving, morally at least, all the people, this system would not enable crime hiding behind law enforcement, judges, as too many people would be involved. These rights are protected in USC 1983. Yet they would also be protected by daily circles of people consensus.

The mini manual, which is much stricter and vitally adamant about front gate and A-camp, was written in 1989.  This was before regionals were popular. Rap 107, which comes later, and quietly discourages alchol, only, reflects a mellower, less “militant” Spirit of the Gatherings, in an age where there have been over 6 2 week gatherings a year, as oppossed to the rainbow of the seventies and eighties, prone merely to 1 large July Gathering, usually in the rockies.

Blaming the influence of pot peddlers for this dispositive concern, even while no money is allowed to be exchanged at the gathering, (aside from donations to the magic hat sometimes passed around the evening circling meal, which is generally used to buy food to be cooked for all, and ocassionally medical supplies, and if rarely necessary, water or water pipes; stems from a summary dispostion positing a marijuanna sacrament, procured so; has come with a corresponding, and juvenile, abusive-alcohol approach. ;

To protect ourselves under USC 1983 title 42, not that rainbows are one for big government, liking to think together; any claims must be dominated, by the fact that such claim is founded due to law or understanding, even while maintaining, that this understanding, being not of federal or state government still constitutes what is meant by “under the cover of law” in sec 1983. And maintain that the claim of deprivations, deprives one of a basic or common right; which the denial of not the loud or obnxious, but privacy and private behavior.

“Prima Facie Case” To establish a prima facie case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiffs must allege two elements: (1) the action occurred “under color of law” and 2) the action is a deprivation of a constitutional right or a federal statutory right. The first element, discussed in Chapter 2, infra, involves a fact specific inquiry wherein the court must examine the relationship betweenthe challenged action and the government.

                                                                                      Introduction to Constitutional Torts Litigation

Title 42, § 1983 of the U.S. Code provides a mechanism for seeking redress for an alleged deprivation of a litigant’s federal constitutional and federal statutory rights by persons acting under color of state law. Section 1983 reads as follows:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,

custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected,

any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction

thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities

secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party

injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding

for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer

for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive

relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated

or declaratory relief was unavailable.

Litigating under this statute is complex. Through the years, the Supreme Court has been able to interpret the terms “person,” “under color of law,” “subjects, or causes to be subjected,” and “and laws.” However, the statute “provides little or no guidance regarding important subjectssuch as the measure of damages, availability of punitive damages, requirements for equitable relief, statute of limitations, survival of claims,proper parties, and immunities from suit.” In an attempt to resolve these issues, the Court has taken steps to examine congressional intent, common-law practices, policy concerns, federalism issues, and comity problems.


Congress passed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in 1871 as section 1 of the “Ku Klux Klan Act.” The statute did not emerge as a tool for checking the abuse bystate officials, however, until 1961, when the Supreme Court decided Monroe v. Pape.  In Monroe, the Court articulated three purposes for passage of the statute: (1) “to override certain kinds of state laws”; (2) to provide “a remedy where state law was inadequate”; and (3) to provide “a federal remedy where the state remedy, though adequate in theory, was not available in practice.”

The Monroe Court resolved two important issues that allowed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to become a powerful statute for enforcing rights securedby the Fourteenth Amendment. First, it held that actions taken by stategovernmental officials, even if contrary to state law, were neverthelessactions taken “under color of law.” Second, the Court held that injured individuals have a federal remedy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 even if the officials’ actions also violated state law. In short, the statute was intended to provide a supplemental remedy. The federal forum was necessary to vindicate federal rights because, according to Congress in 1871, state courts could not protect Fourteenth Amendment rights because of their “prejudice,passion, neglect, [and] intolerance.”

With Monroe opening the door to the federal courthouse, constitutional litigation against state officials developed. Later, plaintiffs seeking monetary damages sued not only state officials but began to sue cities and counties as well. They also sought prospective injunctive relief againststate officials. Ultimately, the federal court became the place to reform Jurisdiction. Two jurisdictional statutes apply to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 litigation in federal court: 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3), the jurisdictional counterpart of 42 U.S.C.§ 1983; and 28 U.S.C. § 1331,  the general federal question statute. Of the two statutes, § 1331 provides for more expansive jurisdiction because it affords jurisdiction in cases raising a federal question. In contrast,§ 1343(a)(3) limits federal jurisdiction to suits involving “equal rights.” Neither statute sets an amount that must be in controversy for jurisdiction to attach. With jurisdiction over federal claims, many federal courts in 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 suits also have jurisdiction to adjudicate state law claims that arise out of “a common nucleus of operative fact.” Formerly known as ancillaryand pendent jurisdiction, supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.§ 1367 permits both pendent claim and pendent party jurisdiction.9 28 U.S.C. § 1367 changed “the preexisting law in that it makes supplemental jurisdiction mandatory, not discretionary.

This last is the real effect of 83, mandatory trial. So often crookedness dismisses.

In the mini manual of 1989 before the monthly regionals became popular, a movement which made things less uptight, the reason for the outright ban of alcohol is alcohol impedes the apprehension of ideas. That is ridiculous. You dont want parties, you dont want alcoholics, you feel an animus to all drinking of babylon that doesnt right the ship, but you dont want the drinking in the parking lot. Thats ridiculous. They can drink anytime.  Rainbow is Gathering time, is for a reason.

In Rap 107 which is more quoted and referenced than the mini-manual, which is alluded to, alcohol is merely discouraged, and thats the general standard. Anything else results in stupid drinking in the parking lot as a party, and unnecessarily uptight atmosphere in the woods. IT is worth mentioning, an assumption rainbows are more socialized than anyone anywhere else, is a false assumption. The woods can be packed with rudeness. The therapy is working through this, and appyling such wisdon to your own life effectively.

right to judge, judiciary, simple discovery, there or not, adult or cover crime, deprived under the law of the judicial article of the constitution, under laws or understandings restricting oversight of the judiciary; folly ignorance of simple principle powerful criminals have the means to hide behind, laws and Judges, should protection of rights be doled out for a few delegated to participate in the protection agency; rather than alternative invovlving civic responsibility, structure more oversight, people come together; yet kingdom of god, controlled to ignorance fact lie. Summary judgement so violates, that it is 1983, liability, fed court, pretrial conference see quote. Monroe Papp 1961= overrule law, mandates remedy through state or feds. Maintains officials even violating  law = empowered by color of law.

In this sense declaratory relief unavailable and therefore qualitifies for undismissive quality

A Critical Approach to Section

Druids, Galls, and Plebes

December 26, 2012

Let’s depart from the notion there is something ubiquitous or divine about our Judiciary; by comparing it with judicial practice among the tribes of Europe in the millennium before Jesus Christ. The importance and relevance of History may be; to change our cultural institutions, we need historical perspective for vital relativity.

Now, the following information, on Gallic and Germanic Tribes, from Italy to the sea north of Germany, is gleamed from Julius Caesar’s Account of his Gallic campaigns, whereas Governor of Gall, he was incumbent to disputes and peace, so on a ten year campaign there he was, also keeping a book about it.

He described the Germanic System of Justice, as Druid based. There are three distinctions between Germanic Tribal Life, and a Constitutional Republic, herein, that there were a class of wealthy and hereditary knights, who made laws, and led laws; and then, a class of druid-educated druids, who became a life-long occupation, accepted at age 20, into a spiritual-justice division of Society, raised then, and educated, 20 years, until a master-druid at 40, for another 20 years. The third distinction, is that in tribal life, where each tribe had a large county, or several, the system was such, that one spent the one year in agriculture, and the next one in the military and so on; And also that one’s agricultural years, were generally in different places each time; moving around was a good, an elemental part of mutually benefitting pagan tribal society.

But there are a few more things that can be said here, as well as may be derived from this information. For one thing, in pagan times, sacrifice to palpable phenomena like Diana the Moon, or Vulcan the Fire; as such, the wars, the aloof upper class knights led, may equal a sacrifice engineered by and through their ancestor gods, in understanding the pagan universe; whereas Druids, judging with spirituality, conflicts of states, and individual’s, with degrees of power stemming from Druid Conduct, were also looking for human sacrifice, the pretext, thereof, a part of pagan practice, the secret of the west has taken away, and placed, just as covertly, in military and judicial apparatus; whereby, in the sense our judges are life-long, so were the druids; and as the druids cast in a net seeking sacrifice, so is our judicial system cast. The critical difference being that in classical times, while classifying Justice, with The Spiritual, and Truth, of some knowledge of Tribes being run by their own in Heaven, or the state of human being, in soothe, like some kingdom of god, Justice itself was focused on, but punishments perhaps routinely more severe.

Now to the south of the Germanic Tribes, across the Rhine, and into Switzerland and northern Italy were the notorious Galls, in some ways, the polar opposite of the regimented German. For instance, the Germans had a law promoting a sex age of 21, the galls, had a gambling streak, that led to people betting themselves, and Caesar himself noted, nothing could spread a rumor, like the galls. At the same time, they were long-haired large boned mountainous people, who were the only ones ever to siege and sack the Roman Republic.

Their system of Justice: They had knights and legislative leaders, but they despised the hereditary and desired a system by merit. (In this way they had a very impetuous, Grecian streak) Likewise, Conflicts, or Disputes, were desirable fodder for remedy by ambitious galls seeking to amplify their leadership; to have helped more people, and have more people helping them; and remain popular with such leadership. For leadership was no long term deal; upon unpopularity, others leaders, swiftly recoursed to. This was another notable impetuos streak, of swiftly expressing dissatisfaction and demanding someone else, they could thus ratify better. Back then, the people spoke, through their representative leadership, through public ratifications, or rejections, of proposed legislation.

Thus Justice and conflict resolution was ambitiously treated in Gallic Society, and the people could see who to turn to, how they are considered; The Gallic Towns, usually had circles, councils, that invited roughly half the people to, a mandatory large quorum for ayes and nays, of ratification of foreign issue, and dealing with current daily local issue.  Likewise, anyone who wanted to attend the councils, or circles, was welcome. From here, we may also surmise, tribal associations handled Justice as well, and the quest for leadership, among more public controversies, that might test larger limits, of metaphysical, historical relation.

To relate Gallic Society to the American Judiciary would be very interesting, and demonstrate a palpable Gallic streak in America, I discern. Whereby, one would end judges, and replace them with a competition among lawyers at conflict resolutions, whereas conflicts resolved by lawyers, were shared with the people and judged popular or not; thus the popular conflict resolvers could keep going, and unpopular ones, not ratified, and new people given opportunity

This briefer duration of Service, would ensure more having had judicial temperament and opportunity to do well. It would provide more openings for conflict resolution, as more lawyers could be called upon to work things out in correspondence to a popular ratification. Likewise, making of public interest, and conflict resolution a popular concern, there is a certain activity of rationality, exercising the Gallic mind.

The Gallic and Germanic Tribes had similar and different Gods and Goddesses. They had intermediaries between the physical, and pagan universe of tribal members in Heaven, who represented the tribe in Heaven. Atheism was not a presupposed basis for Justice.

In the roman republic, for centuries, there was no justice system. Then, for folly and corruption, the soldiers of the army went on strike, and famously camped on a hill, refusing to return unless offices of Tribunes, were created, specifically aimed at, with powers to punish, those of the legislative and  executive branch, who were Patricians only; Thus the Tribunes more naturally Plebes only. Thus class collusion was addressed head on, in a discussion of Justice, and, we must note, this justice system, through ten tribunes, though the numbers varied, was more a check against the legislative and executive branch, than Justice among Individuals, still probably handled in tribal association, as one of Rome, was one of thirty tribes, each of with, some tribal lands. America’s destiny, lacked European tribal association and practice. The Druid had a capacity to exert a weight and check upon the Senate and Knight. Yet there is a great discrepancy between a historical, and spiritual account of Gall. The Historical and Spiritual world are kept quite separate, with their own agenda’s and goals, yet these are more metaphysical, than we might be led to believe. While the Roman Republic, by law, liscenced almost all religions, and promoted many holiday tributes to Jupiter, and Mithras and most of all Mars; can we say the religious spiritual impulse, was tended most within the tribe, and the Roman Republic, outside that tribe, even while commanding it?

The tribune, like the democrat, was raised in the interest of the people against a corrupt upper class, and yet, like judges today, swiftly corrupted, and unfit to advance the people, except in rare prosecutions of outrageous upper class leaders. The ideals of the Tribunal system, such as more agriculture, less war, perhaps, more Tribal input, were swiftly compromised in class war grounded in property redistribution, rather than lower common denominators.

How this compromise, is this; in the more legal, lawful, and stately world of the republican roman tribes, this codification increasingly and purposefully usurped tribal council, and popular means and expressions (till fragmented to this day). With this system, of law, the criminal could hide behind a legal system, by controlling judges. This is a problem with life-long appointment. Judges then, subjugated people, subjugated profession, by very elements Justice, swore against. But then to take it one step further; why has this not come out? The initiation of reform, by the judicial element, or for the experience of lawyers, and journalistic expression? That makes no sense either; how such constitutional structure, must come with its own element of crime: Impunity upon Humanity: How could ye hide so long? If judges and lawyers have a story to tell, how far back can it go? At some point, while the oppressed are imagined, perhaps seen, the oppressors are hidden, and hard to imagine. Are they real, or Chimeras? Can we gain control and stop the situation?

Therefore it is God. God controls everyone, everything, even the very absence of this information:  Because God is imposing a totalitarian system upon our Society; a historical. Meta-physical ,condign, extra-tight, with complicity of our very own ancestors, long looking after us, to this, so: And to take this one step forward,  the metaphysic, or historical creation; every crime and prisoner, controlled by God, the willer of all things, including the design of Individualism: As the judiciary be a form for covert sacrifice, as ancient societies were open about such terrifying aspect. Thus to solve crime, the causes of crime, is a break from a duplicitous system of Sacrifice, as much as a step to Justice, Truth, Metaphysic, Safety.

The problem at the moment, being the acceptance, they are, people are, controlled by God; can that be accepted? And if it is, where does it take us? Is there some rearrangement of Society? Is a spiritual context possible in today’s courts? What if the Kingdom of God is shown in a hearing?

This is what totalitarianism is. Everyone is controlled by God, little, or nothing, is let loose. Totalitarianism is a communion with a heaven that ultimately is in charge of its descendants upon earth. Justice, to be called Justice, must at least be aware, of separate distinctions, of Truth, of Deceit.

At this rate, our top leaders are being metaphysically controlled. By extension, it is hard to think outside of media psychic projection. You have to ask whether this control, of Judges, Tribunes, Leaders, Criminals, is strictly higher power, or mind-control steps are involved, as postulated by people like David Icke, who said, Princess Diana’s Death, was a sacrifice to Diana, as the tunnel was an old place of sacrifice to Diana, and she was kept 95 minutes in the tunnel, after the crash. David Icke talked about how her body guard chauffeur was under mind controll, in order to behave and change a few little things he did.

More grounding is the notion, with our top leaders, controlled, if we are aware of that, what will happen, can we be aware of it enough to change it? To take this investigation farther, let us ask ourselves, “Do people seem programmed?” In general, presidential candidates, presidents, people? And the answer, by me, definitively is yes, people definetely do seem programmed, in particular and in general. So then we have to ask ourselves, how are they programmed. And if we are realistically to  think about this  sort of thing, programming must occur through something more powerful than the people, operating through a mind that operates people, through microscopic, or wide funnel, through someone willing such what  happens, through an impression on general mind, tight in controll, and sufficient to dictate and govern, desired behavior, speech, assumptions.

This mind-control is heavy impressioning my mind. Might we conceive of a different representation of human beings in pagan times, a more honest impression upon mind, a greater communion with the ancestors looking over us, a greater visibility to darkness of the night sky? The metaphysical relation, between Tribe, Ancestor, and other Powers, must be reestablished, though it can be said to have never ceased, merely, totalitarianly, kept from this domain. Simply, being able to see this, is where change should start; a unification of mind, on earth, insofar it takes, in examination, of what they called, Spades.

Future memoranda: memo1, the true state, the “state” the artificial imposing state, upon the human, is the state of the beings; from there, we get political states. Memo 2) Is this why we have judges; does metaphysic, (that we are this way, what can we do?) go to the role of whose entrusted with it? And are judges entrusted with it? Can anyone be entrusted with it?

One mistake I made in this essay: Roman Republic Class War, (the first 600 years) was nothing compared to the Greek Class war. Roman class war is like the rich have to let the poor decide whether they will support the romans or carthoginians. Roman class war is like will the girl  choose the rich guy or the poor guy? Roman class war is eternally demanding redistribution of land. Greek class war is like, the poor slaughter all the rich. The Rich execute all the poor leaders,

If we weren’t made from clay, it would be different.

December 11, 2012

Eve walks by Adam, Adam goes, “Hey, that’s my rib”. Eve responds with a nose nuzzle.

This scene probably had to happen before the fall, and in the garden of Eden. Adam was down a rib, long before a snake showed Eve a tree of knowledge. Before the fall, while they were still naked, allegations of a missing rib, had to be more severe and ticklish. Or maybe, part of the innocence of The Garden, was not telling Adam, Eve was made from his rib. And yet I imagine if the rib was taken from him, then he must be aware of it. The idealty of Eden includes Adam knowing Eve came from his rib. In that sense we strive for domestic tranquillity today.

A world where Eve is made from a rib of Adam’s. Where the Lord is known for having banged out the universe in under a week, where the very material of the humans, who writers come from, though writing is definitely not limited to Earth, and unites us with other forms that write as well, so then we wonder the relation between writers, and the subjects made from Clay about. In any event, in no way can we construe being made from Clay, is a good thing. Quite the oposite; our preponderance to ignorance and folly, indicative of a severely clay-like situation, and not the brain and complex mind-matter one would expect of senses and consciousness. Being made from clay, is an enabling of our service to the Universe. Dwellings are made from Clay; as thus others from outside earth, may dwell in us. An earth subservient to the Universe is very hinted at in Genesis, and yet something not allowed to be said; the big secret, without which we’d stare at our audience; a hard audience our covert sacrifice is harder than.

Thus the fall began with being made from Clay, the fall began in our glorification of a Lord whose simplicity is probably meant to deceive.

Eating the fruit, gaining the knowledge of Good and Evil, understanding clothing, got them kicked out of the garden of eden; but Eden was a fallen environment to being with. America may be a fallen culture: it is fallen, regardless of whether we recognize it as such so. Eve ate the apple, put on clothes, the lord saw the clothes, the shame of her own innocence, and thats a violation of the lease; but this garden, claimed of paradise, had the flaws of clay, glorification, and missing ribs to begin with so as a paradise, it must have been an opiated one; the way TV and such may be construed as paradise.

But let’s consider another way. Say before the knowledge of good and evil, Adam had no idea a rib was gone. Or if he was aware of it, it didnt matter, he had no idea of the values and ramifications signified missing therein. Then, after eating the fruit, gaining knowledge of good and evil, Adam got pissed off about missing a rib, even more pissed off that it is now his girlfriend so, and they both put on clothes, because beyond Eden, Nod, wasnt as nice as the garden,  and stormed off, never wanting to see the landlord known as Lord again, who took his rib, and imposed it upon the clay shape before him. Thus Adam, before eating the forbidden fruit, is incapable of estimating his missing rib; or he is in such faith, that its a non issue. Yet Adam learns of the missing rib, becomes furious at the Lord, and storms out, like some trailer park dispute., strange trailer park dispute.

In this version, it is an awareness of Sin, in our macro-media age, that is the catalyst- Not Sin itself. Sin is alaways there – Yet as inherent to our situation, it comes from above, not  from Earth.

Or Adam was aware of the missing rib; saw it as a severe impedieent, which makes the charactorization of Eden as Paradise, almost promotional  in the interests of the writers of the book as alians, whoo took Adam’s rib, to make Eve so, and when Adam ate the fruit,  he found out, as I said, and it was never the same. But here’s the problem, if we had eaten of the tree of knowledge of good and evi, then we would have firmly gotten by now that being made from Clay is evil, yet at the same time, being made from Clay makes it hard to realize good and evil. Thus how could Adam, made from Clay, comprehend Good and Evil, especiallly when even today, there is none of the necessary condigned negativity associated with being made from Clay, which the situation calls out for. This is the contradiction, People made from clay dont fully get Good and Evil.  All the fall can be about is a pissed off Adam about the rib. Don’t you get, we’re claimed to know good and evil, but dont get were made from clay? That being made from clay, not bioneuroulogical chemicals, is a negative? So Eden was a fallen made from clay state, and there was no need to blame Eve, except in this version of sexism, pure and simple, right there before us, now.

Can we honestly say we have any governance by a knowledge of good and evil? Can we say we ate that fruit? Then why is it claimed we ate it? TO double fool us? Is it possible to ever eat such a fruit, and so gain what we need and have not? What do we have to do to attain common sense, wisdom,  the brain and mind we are promised? No, made from clay means difficult conduit to wisdom.  Moreover we seem governed by some wisdom of the universe and not wisdom of earth.

This is a bit of a new subject. But lets try to make definitive points. What Jesus calls the kingdom of God, Jews call being made from clay. While “The kingdom of god” is a terminological capstone of Jesus’s teaching, Mark 4:12, being made from Clay, isn’t, but Old Testament.

Point being, in terms of epochs, another did begin with the flood. Let’s say Adam and Eve left the garden to evolve in a morally difficult planet. First we have to ask, was earth like a science experiment in a universe that predicted humans on earth, as, they exist within preset conditions. Or was there a scramble to deal with an amazingly unhappy universe? Or both? But then we have  to say, as they left the garden, as animals, without clothes, moving on along evolution, adapting through knowledge of good and evil, there is no need to blame the fallibility upon Eve, even as there may be an anguish to the male expression of childbirth, even a bemoaning that we can’t just be a few living forever, like solitary planets perhaps; the fallibility is on the universe, its rare odds of life, and affliction upon Earth, not the means of spreading good and joy in a dark universe.

And of Course, the farmer killing the hunter, makes no sense, now there’s a sin that caused the flood and a second fall; in that, a lord and patriarch, would favor vegetables over meat, a hunter is more likely to be pent up and violent, and a farmer is stronger than a hunter; thus the flood, and noah, and rescuing the animals; that is a fall through Sin, Cain and Abel capsulize an immoral age; which must be redeemed, or is paid for, by the flood. It is around here that one might insert the women coming from the mans rib? But how would that work; so its put in genesis, but only becomes a reality in later days;


May 22, 2012

“Substantive due process or right protected by this amendment must be one that is fundamental, able to be recognized as such by references to teachings of history and basic values that underlie our society and such historical reference is necessary because of the need for objective standard (Petrey v. Flaugher D.C. Ky 1981, 505 F.Supp 1087.”

The amendment referenced is the ninth; about the retention of rights when rights are denied or disparaged.

The point is that to instigate and implement, through the judiciary, rights, or corrective processes, historical perspective provides an objective standard, objectifying, ironically, through the relativity of history.

I place the origin of today’s problems, politically, in local polities that abridge peaceful-assembly-decision-making, a media that seems against us, and the judiciary.

I’d like to speak of the judiciary. The judiciary needs reform. The Article on The Judiciary in the national constitution is the shortest, of 2 or 3 paragraphs. The Roman Republic, which was very grounded in laws, compared to kings, took several hundred years to evolve to a point of having a judiciary. Thus history shows the judiciary as more likely to evolve than the other two branches. Indeed, until the roman people clamored for a judiciary to check the abuses of the Senate and Executive, there was only The Senate and Executive.

So let’s cast our judiciary in the perspective and light of some judicial natures of history; particularily examine Judges, as one of the big problems with our judiciary are the judges.

First, the perspective of the Roman Republic: First of all, their judiciary only came around because the army went on strike to protest war. Before, there was only a Senate, and Executive. The Senate had to be from the Upper Class. The executive term was one year, and could be by committee. Many tribes and societies of ancient Italy had this system.

From this inception by soldiers, of the judiciary, who leveraged this, you may derive two differences from our judiciary. The first is that to be a Tribune or Judge/Prosecutor in The Roman Republic, you had to be from the Lower Class, you had to be poor. Class collusion, was and is, a real and logical, concern. The polity of The Republic was open-minded enough to realize only allowing the lower class to be elected Tribunals, is a legitimate check upon the powerful and wealthy, and that if tribunes were allowed to be wealthy, they would only lean to the wealthy Senators and Counsels, or Presidents. This is a very humble and ethical notion associating important positions, with lifestyles of the people. Often trades have trade-offs. The important farmer makes little money, but works outside and is important.

So I believe some understanding the judiciary, as a check by the people, upon the allowances of the legislative and executive, and as the vast majority of those afore are wealthy, to be consistent, the judiciary should or could galvanize the not wealthy, as morality may tend.

The History of The Roman Republic sheds light on a second difference and potential reform our judiciary needs: a) Not being chosen by the executive. How is the judiciary to be the intended check upon the executive, if the executive appoints them? That makes no sense, and very often these days, we see judicial preference for the executive branch, exactly play out this way. (It’s also the same suit as the federal government paying the salaries of congressmen, as opposed to the states or people they represent, thus rendering congressmen more loyal to the federal government, than their constituents). Thus, in Rome, the people elected their Tribunes. And not with paper ballots, but in the piazzas with ayes and nays. Because the people understood, it was obvious, if the executive branch chose the Tribunes, The Tribunes wouldn’t prosecute those with the most power to do harm, who behave immorally, to the detriment of The Republic. This was just common sense back then. Where did it go? Likewise, for a time, there was a compromise whereby the upperclass couldn’t determine who was elected, per se, but did have some, not total, official say in who the nominees were.

And b) the prosecuting arm or justice department didn’t come from the executive, but from the judiciary. That way the judiciary could focus on the folly and crime of the executive and legislature. The agency focused on law and justice, morality and folly, initiated, chose and prosecuted cases; not the executive, which was concerned with leading the people. The Executive led the people; however, the judiciary was there to examine that leadership. This way adjudication depended upon the people’s complaints. Whereas if you complain before a judge today, they may not relate to the grievance.

Also, the judiciary had to approve laws. And the people had to ratify treaties and declarations.

Second, let’s look at judges from the perspective of the judiciary per The Jersey Plan. Our national government now, the constitutional convention chose The Virginia Plan, but first they considered The Jersey Plan. The Jersey Plan would have had the judiciary focus on treaties and laws, even handle diplomacy and negotiation, as consistent with judicious intent. The Virginia Plan does not allow States to negotiate with each other, trade pacts, or anything. The Jersey Plan allowed such pacts if they were approved by a federal judiciary. So the Jersey Plan, like The Republic, saw the judiciary as a wise fulcrum for the analysis of legal issues; as their most dynamic compass; directly overseeing government work in diplomacy, law, and trade; rather than being a resource contingent upon litigation, or looking at what is brought up before it, as opposed to having a domain and range of its own concerns, primarily aimed at legal and moral issue, and criminally, primarily concerned with people in power who violate the law. The fitness of justice is quintessionally grounded in judges actively scouring for wrongs. If this origin is disipated, so is justice. There also must be some correllation between misbhevavior by our leaders, and misbehavior in our society.

Third, from the perspective of pagan tribes, which had governments of checks and balances, and classes, and judiciaries; criminal problems and criminals, by the people, not the people in power, were handled by the people, who counciling and assembling often, handled the criminal problems, so the legal system was not beaten down with incessant concerns regarding keeping the peace and orderly society. By law and order being handled by the people, the people being closer to experience, truth, “God” or spirituality, than the people in power, a kindness was supplied that reduced crime, rather than the anger through the legal system we see today, that has yet to really diminish our criminal statistics. Because the artifice of state, is not low enough to the ground, to exert the peacefulness, the godly may induce; as Druids, or the religious, of pagan tribes, was also assigned to keeping the peace, not the state as manifested by knights, and balances of power, and orders from government regarding the organization of society. This is important to get. The people can handle criminal affairs, while judges may handle legal technicalities, or moral recalibrations, or problems in other parts of government, or treaties, or policy issues as they pertain to legal understandings or officials who commit crimes, the people are more fit like juries, to administering the peace, because they are closer to an enlightened mindset than the state, which has a harder time enacting enlightening by burden of its own elaborate apparatus.

And Fourth then let us look at judges from a Gallic perspective. Galls, the frequent enemy and sometimes reliable ally of The Republic, being less formal, and less on the winning side of history, than The Republic, didn’t have official judges. Their understanding of judiciary indented and ingrained into an overall understanding of governing their society. They valued dynamism, so as to encourage the power of who is hot, so to speak, or using his strength wisely. There would be frequent council in Gall, inviting half the citizens, but all were welcome, and the most powerful had clients they aided, and people who helped them. Basically, your political market, and number of employees, measured these Gallic bosses.

And, if there were people who were cheated and oppressed, or if there was conflict between the bosses, or towns or issues and disputes; whichever boss could mediate the best peace, or most effectively end the conflict, or most wisely gain the respect of deciding issues righteously; like lawyers, whoever administered the peace was given the most credence, and one’s reputation was related to the recent, not distant past. Judges weren’t given many cases in a row automatically, as they are now, that would make no sense to Gall. Whoever was making the world most peaceful and taking on the greatest challenges, had the most prestige. Judges were experienced people living life to the glory of Gallic ideals; conflict resolution didn’t exist in writing and casework, but character, truths, and form; living, not reading; active energy, not passive discernment; was what won the respect necessary to adjudicate through commands and agreements and work and negotiation and deal and blessedness. As I said, there was no guaranteed long term either; it was about winning the respect of the people through integrity and handling things. If situations were handled otherwise, those agents would not be considered as conflict-resolvers again, or for a while.

And from the contemporary perspective of common sense, there are several assumptions regarding judicial reform. I think it starts with the consensus that it makes little sense to have one constitutional convention for all time. Why not each generation have that privilege, and maybe weld the laws into forms for today?

Judges are overworked and tenure too long. More judges, enables less burn-out and more lawyers experiencing judgeship, which is good experience. Shorter terms for judges achieve the same goal, and diminishes judges falling into the pockets of corruption.

But most importantly, people reasoning together, is greater than one or a few judges. Judging, and other professions as well, really aren’t that hard, and come natural, like truth and fairness, which is what the judiciary is about. Don’t glorify or say judging is beyond the reach of most. The truth should be simple. Principles, easy to see, laws, sensible. Let’s honestly believe in law, and makes its adjudication participatory and accessible, rather than isolated and confusing.

Allow groups, even large groups, of citizens to argue and determine issues, like accessible jurists.

Finally from an experienced, Christian, spiritual, enlightened perspective, the judiciary erroneously follows the suit of voting and government and history, in the promotion of a world, that represents, what is not. The Kingdom of God, the being, an awareness of the lies, The Kingdom of Heaven or mind; our judiciary is woefully ignorant of this, and therefore far removed and impeded from truth and justice. Thus, as I said, ancient societies let Druids, who greatly tied together religion/spirituality, with the judicial wing of Society: Or The People would handle many matters as deserving the compassion the people bring, and respecting the generally greater understandings of the people in your life, than the removed applications of public venue.

They say the government has prisons and punishes people because if the people and victims did it, they would kill thieves and wrong-doers. I think this perspective forgets how forgiving The people are.

The media, history, purports describing earth, as it most really is. And yet of course, this description is oposite of truth, and devoid of even recognizing Mind, or The Kingdom of God. Media, History, fails to recognize itself as a story, a show, that for whatever reason, is perpetuated.

Of course there is a reason, a sad reason; if you see the apparattus as designed to sacrifice good, for fat, cleanliness for pollution, chivalry, for objectification; The media and history subtly guides our disintegration, and bad things.

Thus the judiciary must follow suit, and as government so, Not, proclaim the Truth, but be intended apparatus within society for the show and story of humans, put out. The Judiciary thus can not be honest, at the level it is handled now; thus note the other levels, and understandings of The Judiciary: Coupling it in Religion, with Druids. Or as a Quasi-Democratic Party of the People, to stand up to the Injustices of The Upper Class.

It’s own laws, The Judiciary fails to apprehend; much less self-recognize its place in the last paragraph. For example, Peaceful Assembly, is constitutionally protected as a locus and form of local decision-making through ayes and nays. Yet Mayors and C. abridge peaceful assembly. Likewise the tenth amendment reserves powers to the state or the people, not given to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution. Well Mayors, and C. are neither the state nor the people. The catch-22, is that if locals took on issues of justice, naturally, through Peaceful Assembly, as they can; the judiciary would start to reform.

 As it is now, my theory goes, reform must come from the judges. Judges know most of all what I am saying is true, and therefore the best imputus to reform. Likewise, Mayors and Local Councils, know most of all, the folly and ignorance of one representing more than one’s own self; and the reform of unnecessary local government, certainly would enemate from them. But, it hasn’t happened. The criminal nature keeps perpetuating itself, as the show and story of media and history; as this is what happens.

But antiquity understood seperating the judiciary from the state, as much as possible, and seeing the judicial check on other federal branches as broadly as possible; equally out of respect for a mode of justice within our world of sin.


The thing is the constitution outlaws diplomacy between the states. So it is inherently against symbiotic relations, or contracts that mutually benefit. The unity of America, gets the states in line, by restricting what States can do. So how can the judges The Constitution provides, be expected to respect the nuance of relations, and sophistication, and contract, when the constitution is against these things very much, and therefore against human nature as well.

Likewise, The Constitution itself, is not a contract or honorable incorporation, as the document never officially explains the purpose of the order of The Constitution, is to unify the country regarding indians and european powers. Thus the causes of the Constitution never come up for debate or consideration, thus the Constitution is a document that doesn’t reference its causes and origins, and thus a document that floats upon itself, rather than a legal rational we may see and respect.

So how can a constitution that doesn’t analyze itself, create judges, capable of respecting an analysis of a situation? There is real hypocrisy here.

“A more perfect Union”. If unity is defined by opposition, and a constitution agreed to, because a more liberal existence not allowed, and the indians and europeans no longer a threat; “a more perfect union”, becomes not needed; and the goal should be something else. But if our constitution doesn’t have the mechanism, to throw the switch and change tracks, by not stating why the people and states are bound this way (Look at least with a tyrant, we know he seized power and morally may be deposed), we have these judges who can’t look at new paths, who are not seeing the situation en toto, only the trees, not the forest, are on a mountain without seeing how the mountain range looks from the distance. They look at something and seem disposed to adjudicate proportionate to power, and even falsehood, rather than realize we live in a world full of wrongs, distinguish trust and respectability from falsehood and oppression, and actually help sort out a conflict, or even pursue truth.