War with isis enables further extension of islamic authority in arab states at the expense of tribalism and more reasonable principle. It will pump alot of money into homeland security and the nsa, the identification of isis as a threat, and thats total bs if both upper tiers, ofmthe u.s and islam, are sickly agreeing to war. Can u see past the propoganda to the reasonable principle that if both upper echelons benefit from war, we really should question the war this way. So much of what is spied on doesnt have much info, so in that sense spying is a worthless job, or, also, spying on everyone gains non related info that can be used against americans by other americans with nefarious intent. This principe can be seen to exist. It shows such a violent height of foolishness as to require mature discussion insofar as it causes a lot of damage and doesnt seem wise or desirable reality.. Is this mature discussion possible?Let’s look at this again. It’s inconsiderable the agency of american government, and islamic government would consider it a benefit for people to die in the name of war that merely strengthens and serves the interest, repressive interests, of the government of the respective governments involved. This is a real horrible situation to consider. And how can it possibly be allowed? Unless the nature of totalitarianism is a rule of us that serves something else, and ominious situation to broach, and yet quite the nature of true government to truly represent us.Now the U.S. Is the worlds policement, and we have to understand the U.S. Has always served european interests by being the bad guy. First by relieving europe of its population worries by being very mean and rude to the native tribes so their overflowing population could move here. This was done by a constitution binding a large variegated regional area to a federal government, that was thus a monster with one set of eyes for fifty states so to speak, eyes which could not be shared easily and were focused on taking indian land avaricely????……Now this same federal bind makes us the world policemen, serving european interests yet again. Who benefits from our policing? Europe is able to appear the good guy and the communist menace is peskily invaded, and complications avoided. But now what has happened? The international police force we are, with bases from bad germany to arab nations, which we pay for, has taken on a life that benefits from these military interactions. The excuse to spy on its own citizens, weighted foreign policy to intervention, without further rational than perpetuity and increase.Think about it folks, the opportu ity to spy and gain information that can be used against people across the board across the board, may be lucrative enough to buy into isis.Now that is what it is, but the point is to try to deal with it, do something about it, from the fulcrum of its very irrationality and insensibility. Thats the idea of government, to deal with the hard ideas and issues, whose dealtness with, benefits all.Is the u.s. by design, designed to serve european interests? Thats an important question to ask, in our interests.How can this not be noticed? Its like we’re mere avatars. There is a control of history, and a negative one. Whats going on here:, inquiring minds?There has to be some check by the people on not approving spendimg for this morally ambiguos if not outright deadly imperialism of ours. Obviously congress cant stand up to those military goons and vote to defund war, even though thats the course the federslist capers and constitution advocate, which begs the question, is our congress actually threatened to approve war funding every six weeks? Is that a chimera in the mind, doubtless, it has the same effect,Which begs to question just how do the people assert their funds are not to be used for war desired by governments, and not the people. When will we see an islamic state fall to the people, or better tribes?: surely the farther away and more diplomatic we are.Lets look at the purpose of this, to kill and be harmful to earth. How do we marshall this? These negatives are flowing trough government. A government then which is purposely distant and unaccessible to the people and reason’s expression, the distance and disdain, purposefully created to insulate what really goes on from some rudder and ballast that would impede what is able t flow through government, war. Yet nor are the people galvanized. Yet war, is not facilitated through the people, but government. Who is more likely then, to converse on this? The people, or the government?I think its possible to say europe avoids islamic conflict by understanding Islam seriously oppresses arab people and arab tribes, and therefore lacks an intellectual credibility requiring such action. And Europe understands the soft skeleton of islamic control is only strengthened and hardened when engaged in conflict; otherwise, like the soviet union, Islam could fall of its own weight, especially if the option exiists to revert to an arab tribal system more.the only way these systems make sense, is if we are supposed to be a dark bad planet eeking out horrible things on a daily purpose to possible obtain some goal, or to survive.We may perceive these words, but not ably respond, being dictated to, by the very forces that run these roughshod this. Dealing what understoodThe situation is this, before we progress, we have to ask the arabs if they want to be muslim because they have no choice, and what they think of the tribes in arab land. Because if arabs are oppressed by islam, kerrys “let arab land be ruled by muslims not militants” will fail. To just ask thisnquestion and get an answer is huge, but we cant progress without apprehending the oppression and lack of choice about islam.:-)to achievemthis arab dialogue, we have to also lookmat the situation in america and askmus each other ourselves, do we like and want our system of school and capitalism, or could we come up w something better, like putting our heads together, making decisions in local peaceful assemblies w ayes and nays? Concerned parents leading children, discussing what we want? Because arab and america has like this lack of choice regarding years of our life, lack of thinking together, how can this be? We must ask our selves? Its not apathy, its a control we need to discuss
This is an out of control situation to listen to reason starts with the relegation of school, and there is no way you can think the tips and peaks of the NSA and ship of general, so to speak, can be for militarized regimes with all the accountriaments therein within, its hard to conceive anyone being for that; so its about crossing the distance and reaching them, or being reached by them, to just discuss whether they are cognizant of the scenario I delineated above; and if this so, just what do we really think of this situation upon earth?……..Another plan, code named Al Capone, involves the IRS. We engage the irs, the irs funds the government, they are normal benign bureacrats behind a desk too much doing customer service out the wazoo. If anyone understands tax dolllars cant go to wars that just increase the regimes running them, that’s not real war, or is it the only war there is? And maybe its time for the IRS to stop this nonsense. Sure they were made too insure the federal government can do what it pleases, but that hasnt condemned tto an immorality, at least I hope so; I hope they understand themselves as an enforcement agency, devoid of morality, that therefore then can be capable of comprehending the not even immorality, but sheer phoniness of what the word war would otherwise mean.
in the nineties, islam was a two bit organization people associated with farrakhan and well behaved black prisoners; now, after over a decade of war, when youd think how everyone sees the suicide bombers and sunnis killing shiites as huge islamic turn-offs, Islam is bigger than ever, and farrarkhan a mere speck of sand; Why? Because we force islam to flex its muscle and lift weights and grow muscular to survive us, and thus islam is growing while we war,, and larger, than it was, embodying more foolish ignorant hopes, and actually coming closer to the dream of an Islamic ruled world, something that couldnt even be imagined in the nineties; So Islamic leadership, wants these wars, so it flexs islam further in self-defense, and our regime wants this war so it can get information on citizens it potentially can extort with, and just further be able to mess with the natural dissent of society, whereas in the clinton era, dissent seemed encouraged, and a rather sunny thing to do. That feeling had nothing to do with Hilary Clinton, and everything to do with bill. For Hilary to ride that coattail is shameless. What I mean to ask, is could the NSA and Homeland Sec. Et al contra vu army-navy, want threatening Isis, for the billions of tax dollars that come with it? Now that’s a serious question. And there is a way it seems true. Could the IRS demand action on this?