let’s look at state constitutions vol.1


“ARTICLE I Bill of Rights

A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS made by the good people of Virginia in the exercise of their sovereign powers, which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

Section 1. Equality and rights of men.That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, pwhen they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness.”

Virginia was where the reactionary, paranoid, evil, strong federal government, “Virginia Plan” came about, through Madison and the virginia delegation. At the constitutional convention. The virginia plan pointedly included the IRS, standing judges, and signicantly eliminated the Judiciary as being a check on foreign affairs, significantly eliminated the right of states to make trading pacts with each other; and allowed the federal government a supreme criminal rather than civil, designation.

This conservatism or lìberalism, ignores the principle of force, and force that flows through war and violence, through histories. The times of lawlessness, outweigh, any other consideration; as to force a focus on the causes and infections of war; rather than the natural ideal. Sold roses, when we should have bought thorns. And then Virginia assumes the violations of earth’s past, aren’t great enough concerns, perhaps in some abundance and light of America, failing to see the totality of history infers a metaphysic. This universal paganism though, sweeping and vaster, than the present time, moment and earth; and desperationation, conceives the assumptions of virginia, as naive, sugar-coated, conceptions, whose lack of fitness, whose weak constitution, is then desired by the very metaphysical forces who rule us.

Surely this is something to get to the bottom of.

This conservativism or liberalism, ignores, people don’t really own property. If you understand the kingdom of god, you understand property is owned by God and everyone. Civilization is carving out capitalism and false assumptions. We are on these routes. These writings comprise a historical opportunity to shift from a less caring state, through an examination of the true state upon us, that aquiesces to the historical state, to something benefitting the present day and future.

“Section 2. People the source of power.That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.”

This precisely speaks to the problem, is exactly the problem. Vermont and New Hampshire go further I believe, extending into the guarentee of public access, and accountability by office to public in their bill of rights, and certainly it is covered in the traditional state constitutional right of the people to alter and reform government to public benefit.

This so encapsulates the problem I and activists, go through. Government is so far away, especially the stilted Judiciary. If the people have a choice between the people resolving conflict and a government resolving conflict you would want the people. With government controlling conflict resolution, you have factions stronger by many than the few judges power is concentrated in, and the parties powerful enough to control judges, get good at winning and controlling judges, to a point where America is effectively run by some criminal syndicates able to routinely control judges. And indeed, the american judiciary, has no principle of good faith discussion, no guarentee of investigation: But a judge, who in a hearing, both sides speak to. The judge then comes back with a decision. There is no oversight, just by the next round of judges, victims and vulnerable to this structure as the one that just heard you. Good faith, enlightened discussion, reduces crime. Yet American Judiciary has paniced into this stilted form that neither insures honest judges, or requires honest good faith real politic sit-downs to figure out what to do, to even reduce crimes so a bit. Such promotion of honest good faith discussion between parties; so what if one party is criminally more powerful, at least let’s force a sit down to see if we can get honest discussion. Such promotion of hònest good faith dialogue, even as it encompasses criminal element, would reveal our government as hopelessly not the strongest power at the table. The promotion of government through law enforcement and penal system as a scary strongest power, is another bit of fiction, for this satanic structure to play through. Political parties, the military, bonds of religious faith, bonds of crime and oligarthic money, all of this secret establishment, can be stronger than one judge deciding a conflict; especially if these judges have gone along before, or groomed for this disgraceful, and inconceivably as desired, conduct. And through this, an honest rendition of sovereignty has been blurred.

The greatest problem is you can point out something clearly wrong to government and they won’t respond, or send a form letter, and literally have the attitude of getting rid of you, not having to deal with your honesty and good faith at all, or as little as possible. This is the importance of establishing the state constitutional route to access, and alter and reform, via following codifications in state constitutions. If you see things clearly, you have the sovereiegn interest and should be able to access and work with government. But this is precisely the separation of people and state, desIgned by the constitution, and precisely the constitution designed by History, and a History designed by who, what, and how. Thus when it is most important, a form to discuss with government, is least, nor promoted by law. Thus this Virginia State Codification is essential to enshrine, and apply.

My readers are the people, and goverment officials or employees who read my filings, or correspondence of concerns. Is there a division between what the government understands, and you understand of this? Does the government reader have less comprehension than you. When is the manifestation of comprehension. Totalitarianism.

Gall accounted for the vulnerability of officials to networks with greater loyalty and efficiacy than government; indeed aware of the metaphysical destruction upon tribal requirements, the metaphysical forcing, of what tribes don’t want; this they combatted, according to ceasar’s account of his campaigns there, through a judicial system of conflict resolution, ceasing tensions between wrongers and wronged, through lawyer like galls, who would rise in estimation, per effectiveness, and thus by being the choice of the people, on a dispute by dispute basis, if one lawyer, was resolving matters poorly, so a next one could be tried, upon the mere whim of parties involved trying other mediators. A mediator didn’t exist beyond his present matter. There was no entrenched person it had to go through.

And there was no assumption the governmental concerns and qualities of the mediator, were strong enough to enforce justice by might. Critically, there was no automatic tendency to a great or greater power enforcing justice; but an understanding reason looks into unjust matters, and does the best it can. Such disposition is a compromise, not the ideal, but the pragmatism that realizes, a greater power, than what is concentrated in one with official power, can and has and does overwhelm official power. Thus the people must be able to assert their dispositions upon mediators and handlings. For which Gall also practiced noon village council meetings which 50% of the attendees, counted as a say; 50% of the village or so, the more mature 50%, was encouraged to participate in feedback, disposition and voice votes; according to Ceasar.

In our way, a subverted and inadequate court system facilitates the crime upon our wealth; from which wisdom is forsaken; Yet even the route to discussion of these judicial issues experienced, with the division of law; of which whom is the lawyer of the judges, and the caretaker of laws; which, in, at least, is not even a remedy in law; indeed the remedy in law line, seems impossible in a system created for no remedy in law; and yet even the legal and lawful and constitutional, higher than statutory, yet with no case law; that I know of; these issues are too deep; so, an opportunity; is not comprehended by the division of law, which per R.12:? Receives a copy of all filings before the supreme court regarding constitutional matter; even this natural path, and plank to the division of law, is subverted from intention.

Thus we have law, without enforcement. As Locke Noted. And the guardians of our rights, seem to not guard them; in kick to the rear of Plato’s Utopia top quarter of society being made guardians of the rest; as the 25% middle and upper classes, have created a reasonable economy; as patrick henry noted, and the galls seized, no one guards rights, that makes no sense. I am going to protect your property? How can I get that close to you to protect it?

We’d discuss whether the scant enforcement is structured on purpose, to have little critical effect, without rate reduction.


“Section 3. Government instituted for common benefit.

That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.”

Again, this is art 1 2a of the N.J. Constitution, from where I started all over again : ”  a.  All political power is inherent in the people.  Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.  ”

If the invocation of this law, in a standing matter, can’t compell the propiety civilization promises, without recourse to the Supreme Court of America, then how is this law applied? To a tone able to round people to the righteousness one, commanding a sought tone?” What is so hard about merely discussing the situation at hand, as lawyers or concerned citizens would? Because such discussion has been suppressed so far, it can not logically be unsuppressed by me; without some considerable jostling, for it has been jostled a bit.


“Section 6.

Free elections; consent of governed.That all elections ought to be free; and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community, have the right of suffrage, and cannot be taxed, or deprived of, or damaged in, their property for public uses, without their own consent, or that of their representatives duly elected, or bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assented for the public good.”

This to me, is a very important illusion to point out. On paper, and remember our history is so much on paper, and paper, can say anything, so the notion of private property, in face of the kingdom of god, is illusion, propoganda for History, against tribal notions, where still linger to this day in parts, tribal grazing lands, tribal pastures, which were recognized way around Italy approaching Ceasar’s time, until the democratic party assumed charge, for its superior weilding of the military, and thus would take tribal grazing lands as federal lands, and grant them as colonies or land grants to soldiers, in return for their warfare, and citizens to appease them.

Another constitutional precept some states include in their bill of rights, some don’t; is treating victims with respect: how is this done; when the judge-system disrespects you, and its worse than the matter itself, indeed, the matter is predicated upon the protection of an unjust judiciary.

The notion of free elections is contingent upon atheism. The subversion of society by the means of less, to the needs of less, is in many places, and levels.

separation of state and people, and bad, and which has more spirit, which is rude history, which doesnt makke sense or believe in the people?
Atheism not religion, historical ontext and actual law orwell


Letter from Thomas Jefferson, of Virginia, Governor, President, Statesman ”

“We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice” (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)

Again, this obliguely reminds us how political parties are structured to be stronger than the government, and dictate policies, or derive benefits, upon through.
It is political savvy to raise issues of judgement by many, judgement, contingent upon one matter at a time, an acknowledging government sovereignty is no greater than a vassal state under Rome’s; were Rome a secret criminal network; as such pretext by the less, facilitates more destruction of earth., hub to the universe, it may be.


People talk of the need to realize the full effect of the words in the constitutions. But in a world, that claims to be ruled by law, but this rule goes through men, we are really ruled by men, the laws are there to be looked at, but it is the men who make decisions. And without verymuch oversight. Jeep David argues the granting to judges an immunity to civil prosecution, and citizen prosecution, effectively grants an emolument or class of nobility, insofar as the nobility was immune to suit, a nobility being a part of the sovereignty, could recuse itself from suit upon it, because its power simply enabled such. This basic contradiction, consists with many others, to be worked out.

Floyd and Barker (1607) “And those who are the most sincere, would not be free from continual Calumniations,” in all cases it is the judiciary’s responsibility to avoid “vexatious” or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability.  “Vexatious” or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor.

And yet the immunity status granted to Judges regarding USC 42 1983 prosecution of civil rights violations, such as by judiciary, grants a royal power. It is vextatious and calumnious. Propoganda would have us see our representative government as inimical to nobility, and in direct reaction to nobility; but really, not only is it in effect the same thing, of the removed and vulnerable making decisions for and leading us, and us not really getting much word in edgewise; nor much palpable gain; but the roman republic and classical Italy, essentially and vitally tied together government, representative, senatorial, judicial government, with the nobility, through laws allowing only the noble class to be knights and druids and senators. It was two class society, with the upper class allowed to participate in government. Even though the class is less distinct and defined, and the poor do become rich leaders, government itself, still operates as a noble class, therefore for the a larger noble class. Representative government can be seen as a lateral step from autocratic nobility; and not as “higher” than it, or more common and egalitarian than it, as too oft considered.


The first important thing to do: If alians are long in control of earth, and running history, through a literal subverting of the human brain, which is a literal metaphysic, than the people in prison, and all of history didn’t do it, and need release, and relief. There, this is the maine, this is the tactic, this is the path we are fighting along, though fighting is not the right word;


I dont feel I am dealing with anyone, but dealing with God.
how else could crime flow so swiftly

Michigan has a principle, whereby the constitution must operate on popular understandings, or understandings of the constitution, that most people know or have, and therefore are popular understandings.

2a) due process to protect individual, criminal, civil, and it doesn’t, failed, disparagedd me, lied, murder, no response, due process shouldnt exist, more about being kept from being screwed over, which is precisely the area thats been happened, atmosphere for screwing over, and due process =being screwed over, because government is not greater than crooks, our form is wea and subverted to crime, or falsehood, ignorance, exploitaion; . be the reasoning party, force sue peace come togeherr, ok, but then reason and greater powers, now you have distance, rule by greater power, through law, with no checck on them

Recourse to law? Due Process? None what to do/

fàct can’t deal, power fourth through stilte

PAG v commission, the route to division of law.; no good faith form, to mechancial judges
my instance cant say 1, can’t say two, what to do, past, and future brain.

its not to punish
its from not taking care of yourself, mechanism of society voids care as well.

Section 2. People the source of power.That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.

See this is in 2a and exactly what is happening, denial of public access upon something wrong and systemic dealt with calmly.

Section 3. Government instituted for common benefit.That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, r7j9i0nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.

You see, though commanded in law and verse, the division of law, systemically protects organized long entrenched criminal patterns; Though I explain the transcendant nature of t, historical perspective, history as fake, as the control needed to do this, transcends and becomes about a control of earth, neither desire, nor necessarily earthly, and incorporate christian terms; there is still no answer.

This is difficult, and so we become the division of law, with the entrusted protection of the division of law, and corresponding, the people.

Yet a psychological evaluation of the system, comes to these three prongs; 1) People are unable to address this scope and dimension, because they and society do not give attention to themselves as violated, oppressed, and exploited greatly, beyond worldly consideration, into metaphysical terroritory, individuals and society ignores spiritual and presbytarian services, as Jesus plugs a gap blocking one’s view of the pagan pantheon; thus withou awareness, they react without thought to the premises.

2) People may not be allowed to address these issues, and once allowed will respond very nicely to these issues.

3) THe metaphysic of this, is more intimate and twisted. It is a very deep situation. No one wants this.

I have very little confidence in the supreme court understanding this. Ironically media help and media focus, the media alteration of history, provides enough ballast to transcend judical prejudice. Things can be understood here in the media, in a way they can’t be understood, away from here., away from media or sense, alone, secretive, criminally coerced. Obviously the blending of coercion from criminal or metaphysic, would be a salvatory conversation. As it is, respondent fails to recognize the hall marks of murder, control of family; do they understand nothing? Do they accept hiding crime throughout their careers? The contract is negated into you, trying to help them, you become their lawyer, seems to be the relationship.

Commission state route div let
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985 our media neglects, and we just cover and are limited to then, and even derivations and alternatives are contextualized by mass media, and limited by their conception, mainly that we can and should live tribally…….you dont get the abscence of that signifies a totalitarian contro by mass media. You are so far frrom the terror of the lord.

 U.S. Code § 1986 – Action for neglect to prevent

Rule of law? We all want to talk but can’t say, hoboken criminals as well http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985
Not disabled, nor ever construed as such, working helping vera—currently money taken, people know, serge, vern, judges system others, just talk, still i control

Not taking care of ourselves and societý media so about introducing it. Through this matter with you, but you are controlled. By forces, enabling
Want to take to supreme court, you wont lawyer help? So what meditation changes this.

What is the control? It is close to me; your reactionaryism, when if we do interact, is literally a part of us not dealing with what “you” really are; and if you havent dealt with that, what can you deal with. Thus you, or we have to understand our own loss to move forward and clear and clean up what we can.

If you or we are able to deal with that, then we might move forward, yet there are more enlightened people or are there, and where does enlightnement start, with one here? On tv? With old people realizing they didnt get a life?
Gov policing itself, constipation, mechanical nature dmitted to judges

Section 12. Freedom of speech and of the press; right peaceably to assemble, and to petition.That the freedoms of speech and of the press are among the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained except by despotic governments; that any citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, nor the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances.

But this still removes and disables policing for which crime all over etc, war, local officials

(2) (a) The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction only, except it shall have the power to issue all writs necessary in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, or the complete determination of any cause, or as may be required to exercise control of the Court of Justice.

Writ here then commission?
Again Section 1: Rights of life, liberty, worship, pursuit of safety and happiness, free speech, acquiring and protecting property, peaceable assembly, redress of grievances, bearing arms.All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned:First: The right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties.Second: The right of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences.Third: The right of seeking and pursuing their safety and happiness.Fourth: The right of freely communicating their thoughts and opinions.Fifth: The right of acquiring and protecting property.Sixth: The right of assembling together in a peaceable manner for their common good, and of applying to those invested with the power of government for redress of grievances or other proper purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.Seventh: The right to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the State, subject to the power of the General Assembly to enact laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed weapons.Text as Ratified. on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 2: Absolute and arbitrary power denied.Absolute and arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a republic, not even in the largest majority.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28,

Again, no police by the people powers, very limited, about protecting yourself and changing government if necessary. Does petition mean to effect change, or have a physical injury, or grievance in broad legal senses; arms, speech, communicate, even aquire, assembly, (misses petition). All about changing, must extend to 2a HERE; and yet crritically without invested means, as gov invested in, or establishedd means, to change, just these ways, of tehe much less powerful than government to stand up to government.

This is very flawed. Constitution, nature of its irremovability media lord, but also just way things are done near me.

Section 4: Power inherent in the people — Right to alter, reform, or abolish government.All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.

So this is the sole manifestation of policing, flimsy, untested, true, and yet no enforcement of it.

All courts shall be open, and every person for an injury done him in his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 15: Laws to be suspended only by General Assembly.
But this shows remedy by law doesnt exist, not possible judge to admit each corrupted hands over, because no decisions made, see, no decisions, based on atheistic assumption that doesnt exist. Neither enforcement, nor means of enforcement

Atheism, and simply not true by this structure so how is it uncaught? Well first how do I catch it? I read laws. So then can we assume others dont and the lord control. The lord controls. ??? What can we talk about this, anyone, how I know this Division of Law, how do I know this and others don’t. Can we just discss that, can anyone


Section 22: Standing armies restricted — Military subordinate to civil — Quartering soldiers restricted.No standing army shall, in time of peace, be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly; and the military shall, in all cases and at all times, be in strict subordination to the civil power; nor shall any soldier, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, except in a manner prescribed by law.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 23: No office of nobility or hereditary distincDDtion, or for longer than a term of years.The General Assembly shall not grant any title of nobility or hereditary distinction, nor create any office the appointment of which shall be for a longer time than a term of years.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 24: Emigration to be free.Emigration from the State shall not be prohibited.
Standing army principle, emigration implies fear of other thing, tribal serf?

Section 26: General powers subordinate to Bill of Rights — Laws contrary thereto are void.To guard against transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, We Declare that every thing in this Bill of Rights is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate; and all laws contrary thereto, or contrary to this Constitution, shall be void.

1law of sea, 2, no quarter symbolic, real deceptive of lack of police; ex of law invioate enshrined yet not, law is bs
Div of lw fishman, corzine, and tenth and peaceful assebly, legal form, why do I know this? Also 2a 04-366, or just talk; just want to woork with, not adversarial, d

Article III.Section. 1.The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.Section. 2.

What is Judicial Power. Basic decisions and understanding not raised, why me. Judicial power should be about creating Justice. How is that done. Conceentration of power means crime hides behind judges they control. Atheism is inimical to Justice, our judiciary so pressured by atheism, reality and calming truth that resolves conflict, indeed, changes our way; But the gallic model would be leading lawyers, subject to popularity, resolving disputes by meddiating between powers. Gall acknowledged strong asociations, outside of government and stronger than government, a fact today, orleads. Thus its not judicial power, but mediating justice, showing the unjust, injustice is wrong. We don’t have that opportunity we do not show light or create peace, the point is to punish. The assumption of Judicial power here, excludes mediation between factions, per camoflage of being able to enforce right.

The Jersey plan for judiciary, left civil and criminal matters to state, and had a judiciary that approoved treaties and pacts, between states, which is not allowed by the virgnian plan, that could extend historically into a check upon legislation for morality and concerns of law.

—–What is “the United States”? States that are united, but not necessarily bound to the unity of the constitution, federal, if you follow reading, we are a unity of states, for the purpose of protectioon from indians and europe, this is not longer needed or feasible. Again why is this outside the debate.

What is one supreme Court? A limitatioon and concentration into nine judges and one court; whereas congress expanded per expansion of country, the judiciary and executive, has not compensated for that; signifying the rule of crime, shifting it may be, over concentrated administrative forms. Historically, the execuive can be by committee, or have one year terms, and also, be more overtly linked to the military, rather than secretly as this historical link, infers.

What are inferior courts by congress? Like a commission? When is this invoked? why is it not cited?Ther are many, congressional courts can appoint can hire judges or court personel; but it is an example of ignorance, congress never says we are rolling out an inferior court. There are commissions looking into 9/11 and Bengzhai, but these are not seen as courts, they collect data, and write analysis, and may issue charges, but that is more like a grand jury court, and the redressing power of justice, rarely cited and seen as pouring through these commissions. An inferior court may resolve an issue, but generally, these commissions, let off the FBI regarding Kennedy, and the bush administration regarding 9-11, and Bengzhai. Interesting to see what christie birdgegate leads to. In this sense parallel to justice department, prosecution, and not court per se, not manifestation of justice. Regarding my issues, would congress found* an inferior court to draw out these issues. Congress dooes have the power to subpoena. Is that an inferior court? there are no judges created and paid for these concerns, but senators on federal payroll already.

No normal judges have behaved, cite cases; complete bs ignorance of law, or even concerns concerning the sovereignty concerns. This expectation, that isoolated judges can stand up to crime, is reinforced by this payment. the implication of eliminating the threat of reducing pay, to compromise judicial integrity is also a red herring. At this level, of following orders, hard to believe anyoone can own anything, too much leverage provvided by immoral world. Atheistic pressure, and acting otherwise here, deceptive, as is basic representative premise of concentrating power, isolating and distancing government and the means to address concerns, from the people.

Article 3 section 2: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;– between a State and Citizens of another State,–between Citizens of different States,–between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State, Citizens or Subjects.

Judicial Power, or mediation. Confusion of absolute power with unity to protect a country taking land from natives, and not integrating or accepting their lifes typle and tribal understandings. In law and Equity, arising under constituton, means not foreign treaties, and state treates pacts not allowed conspicuosly missing—-ambassadors, ministers and counsels, scooter libby taking fall for dick cheney comes tomind, Is the U.S. A party to enforce N.J.? what about state. And I don’t need judicial power, I need good faith honest discussion, and work, working through these concerns with government per 2a. Due process subject legally to judicial discretion, when really great issues law. How often controversies between states, wind power and texas obligation, few water rights, amputating states, bills of credit, less monolithic more special and unique economic development would have ocurred between states; Goal of reducing work week, increasing quality, lost, for education that has not resulted in awareness, thinkking together, of these issues.
State and citizens, banned by eleventh, misplayed Hans bad opportunity. What ministers and counsels, Why not secrataries, girl thing, or commie term?

Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.Section. 3.

Again, ambassadors, ministers and consuls, are terms we dont use and demonstrate how archaic our constitution is, shows a plane were the needs it served are uuseless and counter productive now, why do I get it …is Stevens a case? Supreme court has original jurisdiction…..law and facts so far ignored, hope? Also what regulations has congress made, has this been acted on congress regulating the supreme court, seems allowed but not practiced, as is society honestly…i guess thats procedural title code guidance like 85 and 86…..and yet is there a need for 85 and 86, isnt justice obvious, and regulations by congress…..just what regulations would be made, kinder to liittle guy, exposing fraud co-opptioon, more judges?

 against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.Article. IV. Speaks to law of sea, international means, selling out of america, bin laden in pakistan, how is there two warring parties in togethher, treasson at highest level; nature of generals to go along with war, how much that involves helping each other, while klling each other?

Div law, honoken illegal, for,sign not come up as offensive to power tpvut vern involved,how know….



That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:

Sec. 1. FREEDOM AND SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE. Texas is a free and independent State, subject only to the Constitution of the United States, and the maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired to all the States.

Sec. 2. INHERENT POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.

Sec. 3. EQUAL RIGHTS. All free men, when they form a social compact, have equal rights, and no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive separate public emoluments, or privileges, but in consideration of public services.

1) in brief preamble, “free” signifies free from criminal interests, specifically a free from criminal interest judiciary and legislature and executive;;directly applicable to those trying to access and reform state government.
2) Not everything in law is good. Some is bad. Sec One is interesting and different. Each state’s section one highlights some state priority. Like N.J. Cites protection of life property and liberty; Texas highlights the federal government, stating its loyalty to the federal constitution; this is interesting on several points. We havent seen other states cite the USA. Texas several times has been voted state most likely to secede, so its pointing out the United States, is ambiguos, and perhaps foil, by highlighting. Citing free institutions and perpetuity of the union, Texas goes on to cite, the right to local self-government, which is ambiguos and bad, as local selfgovernment excercises per tenth amendment powers not givern to the federal government, as reserved for the state or the peòple though, excludes local officials, as local officials are neither state nor the people. Thus the state of N.J. Its law annals say, the state legislature made local decisions, such as zoning and traffic lights. The alternative is the people making local decisions with ayes and nays in peaceful assembly as practiced in smaller towns in massachussets, See Mass guide to local government. Thus highlighting local self-government, when it be in unconstitutional structure, violating 14th amendment protection of immunities, to local official, and priviledge of decision-making peaceful assemblies; as the basis for the union; not only speaks to the priorities of other states, which no state I’ve seen so far does, but, given the laws I cited, is morally ambiguos at several levels.
3) Their sec 2 is different and interesting in citation of “republican” government. I define “republican” as Machiavelli does; as uniting diverse areas that otherwise might be not united; certainly the cause for the national defense of America, this unity, and prevention of intercine state conflict. Texas is large enough to conform to this definition of “republic”, and as so republican too, as in republic, may have envy to the republic of america, show concern to other states, and highlight one of the glaring unconstitutionalities of America, (which I brought up in federal court, 04-366, some time agon, to no avail”. Texas also uses the language, “abolish” which is hard core, and “expedient” as well, signifiying the importance of expediently reducing crime, meaning established interests will get hurt. But seems to demand a committent to republican principles noted above.
4) Sec 3 is interesting, because ir recognizes government class has a different set of rights; This references the roman republic, where the government class, had a separate set of rights than the plebian class, because only the patricians were allowd to serve in government, and thus government service venerated by propoganda. That said, the government class is generally a part of the problem, not solution.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: