Hamilton and Burr, too great to happen

July 11, 2014

Vic Fedorov

Jul 3 · Edited · here’s a bit of a historical mystery I’m uncovering. As we all know, one given dawn, Alexander Hamilton and AAron Burr rowed across in seperate boats the hudson river to duel on the weehawken cliffs because Manhattan outlawed dueling, and N.J. Understood both sides should shoot into the ground, OK, but Burr didn’t, Hamilton purposefully shot high and to the right. Anyway Burr was vice president, thou shalt not kill in jersey, despite dueling granted, and the very constitution Hamilton architected would seem to guarentee the extradition of Burr, to N.J.. But somehow, while Burr stayed out of jersey, no state extradited him, and he effectively got away with the murder of the foundation pillar of our constitution. Was Burr protected by being vice president? Do you really think the american people couldn’t handle seeing their vice president extradited and prosecuted in jersey? That the murder of a former secratary of treasury could be covered up in the sense of their being no punishment, because duleing came with the terrority? But then no other famous politician got murdered in a duel. So what if it was a hit, the vice president carried out, because by then, they knew the constitution was bunk, mean to indians, and this outcome a symbol of their disappointment and delusion waking up? I mean what exactly how did Burr get away with the murder of a most prominent citizen; in direct contravention of constitutional understanding and the first principle of state to guarentee the effort to life and property? It would seem to symbolize the obligation to life and property in the state, is in name only. That there really isnt this concern, if its very author’s murder, go away with it.LikeCommentShare2 people like this.Beverly Jean Perkins Thank You Vic, you really help sometimes…needed to think on this.Like · Delete · Jul 3Vic Fedorov scary if you live in jersey, I mean, you can’t kill here, we want the vice president to be prosecuted for manipulating dueling into MURDERLike · More · Jul 3Vic Fedorov But the other states don’t go along? Somehow Burr is above the law?Like · More · Jul 3Vic Fedorov What kind of federation do we have here?Like · More · Jul 3Vic Fedorov One that ignores murder, the murder of the writer of its most pompous lawsLike · More · Jul 3Vic Fedorov You need no further proof of how frustrating our constitution isLike · More · Jul 3Mari Brandon Alexander Hamilton got killed in a duel. ? Well, far-out–the bastard was a major capitalist pig who helped corporations and hindered the ordinary citizens. Thomas Jefferson wanted a nation of yeoman farmers and craftspeople (and of course slave-owning plantation owners) , Hamilton was all about corporate capitalism.Like · Delete · Jul 3Vic Fedorov thats what im sayoong it was a fixLike · More · Jul 4Vic Fedorov Mari thats what makes this political karma so intriguing. Since when does the most evil man of the milenium die in a duel, it be covered up by not being punished, the murder aspect is not recognized, ? It can only happen if the repubican establishment found out how evil he is and just took him out this way; his foolish penchant fordueling, this was at least his fifth, he always shot in the ground, so thats good….Did he basically let thte republicans through burr, kill him? Did he know Burr was shooting to kill? He wasnt a natural born citizen and his allegiance to this country, possibly questioned through his allegiance to his father, who wasnt of this country, but the pirate carribean off shore private slavery bad thingsLike · More · Jul 4Vic Fedorov When the vice president murdered the former treasury secratary and author of overr two thirds of the federalist papers, in a duel, and no state extradited Burr back to jersey, despite the constitution extradtition laws, the stain of murder, was effectively covered up, and taught as an inconsequential duel. It was the equivalent of the murder of timothy geitner, by dick cheney. Killing via duel, was a big crime in New Jersey back then. It was discouraged, and deaths resulting, prosecuted. People were expected at most to shoot in to the ground. So this was murder, a huge murder; and because it wasnt prosecuted, History refuses o speculate on the proximate cause of the murder. Historical analysis is so inside the box of history, that if the murder was covered up because it wasnt prosecuted it didnt seem like a big deal,, there’s been llittle inquiry into the proximate cause of the duel, not the literal reasons behind it, but it seems a plot to get Hamilton; It’s very cover up and letting Burr get away for decades, speaks to the same cover up that demanded Alexander Hamilton dead. The ratio descento of the murder of,the architect of,the constitution has always been merely a duel, emotions:-) does anyone really believe that? Because were that the case, burr wouldnt have been indicted for hamiltons death. Were that the case, burr wouldnt have gone scott free. You can say it was emotions and officials like burr above the law……but that involves too great a condemnatikn of america, to,remain as itmhas:-) far more likely, it was something people were in on, and done for a reason, because it wasnt THAT scandalous that the courts couldnt play through:-) burr could have done a little time for it, but these people in in consoiracy get protected, or,they wouldnt do it. America would have liked to,stamd up,to,and stop dueling, thus missing this opportunity is also suspicious.Edited · Like · More · Jul 6 at 11:39amVic Fedorov And why would they want hamilton dead? Because the constitution sucks. You concentrate power in a few, and to committ the worst crrimes, those few just have to be controlled, concentrating power in a few enables systemic crime, a government thats a front…..creates a vulnerability to the quiet softings of satan……the lessening that that we know works through a cnstitutional system this way……but the same lessoning also shows how hard it is to reason and discuss this. It’s obviously true, and very important to discuss, but there is no discussion of it. What foments discussion? inquiry, and moral axis. Therefore, corruptions fester in secrecies; and sunshine of discussion on hard issues, may resolve them. We need more light here; I dont know how to get you to reason to this logic. But some of you personally know it is true, and pointedly don’t talk. So there’s a huge need for therapists, not sure if you can buy stock in psychologist, might be a bit like private prison, not really the straight and narrow, you are in a country, like most with a constitution that concentrates power; the main thing that does, is enable crime and make government easy to control for crime, some of you know this personally, Any talking about it, would shine it away; so there’s a totalitarian chasm of silence; yet out of that chasm shall come the change, the newEdited · Like · More · Jul 6 at 12:00pmVic Fedorov This isnt negative folksys, this is the opportunity to talk, which is really positive. The ability to reason, is less important than the ability to talk about what you went through. To object, to, say something does not make sense, requires a healthy psychological disposition…….and talking about this secret capstone, doesnt happen, for then it would fall:-) thus i offer a rare opportunity to talk about something very important, that could further therapeutic things. The opportunity to talk about very serious things, hereLike · More · Jul 6 at 1:06pmVic Fedorov OK I said Hamilton was the worst man of the milenium, and maybe you thought, no, Hitler, or Stalin, or Mao, they all alleged and did kill millions. But see, they were all twentieth century, and began just as the near extermination and running off of the native tribes here finished. And that’s why Hamilton was more evil than ghengis khan, so to speak, by uniting the states as he architected, he was the leader, Madison served him; he effectively created the vehicle that gave the native tribes no hope nor real interaction or protection from. That elimination of native tribes here, was the worst thing done of the milenium; and as it finished up, (in the end of the 1800’s and early 1900’s) we can see world expression, of germany rising up in the 1880’s out of city states, imperialistically in 1914, and super criminally in the 1930’s as a painful wail of anguish that the tribes over the atlantic were gone, and by western sacrifice; that’s if we interpret History with this symbolism, or even as a literary novel, yuch though itt is, the twentieth century came with its mass murderers, after the mass murder, or unfair war in north america was over; That was what was so bad about Hamilton, off the ten dollar bill, and when the work he set in place was done; it was germany that inflicteda painful self-wail, both following suit of horror, and crying out, for the loss of tribes, as only germany can insofar we believe, the germanic tribes held out the longest in europe, without being crude as goths and visigoths; resisting roman expansion greater than the brits, scots, galls, north african and italian and spanish tribes. Germany, as the strongest leader of european tribalism, wailed in a vicious expression of world historical symbol, about the loss alex hamilton designed………………………………………..And yet when we all take responsibility for this, for europe was behind the conquest of north america, it enabled europe keepings its population down, and america doing the dirty work, per the european design that created and still rules through, our constitution…………when europe and us, take responsibility for our recent history of barely a hundred years, we will return to tribalism; and this epoch of history be done; and who knows what the new change hold?……………………………All of this ———————– from the cover up of the murder of the chief author of the federalist papers, which has the constitution in it, and the virginia convention followed suit, resisting the nj plan for a more morally bound judiciary, and diplomatic states….as Madison and his virginian co horts in June basically did as Hamilton beckoned…….from the disguise of his murder, as feud, thus warping your vision of how big he was, and Burr a sitting vice president; who knew vice presidents did so little, and yet so much……nor in a side note, can extraditioin in a common law country be conceived within this Stain of Weehawken……………….what I mean, is by not extraditing Burr to jersey for murder per law, we fail to see the extraordinary t o this story, nor how suspicious it is, and thus no disgruntlement or knowledge of the constitution as anti-tribal, comes to the fore of media, or person.Edited · Like · More · Wednesday at 3:19pmVic Fedorov By this analysis, the brits threw the war to us, and by parallel, in the battle for italy between rome and carthage of norh africa, carthage threw the war to rome, in both cases fo the rising power to dominate tribes and take them to history, or ratherr the dustbin historry can be. Both wars basically had foreign troops, british and carhtaginian alliances, marching around tthe somewhat foreign land of italy or america, and eventually losing. Both places establish promient cities with the word new in it, neew cathage of spain, as spain was in the deal foughtt for too, and new york and thus both shared an interest or stake in the new workl or rome and america, without playing a historically noted role of benefittinng foroem relegation of native tribes. The romans were not foom italy, through its murky, nor americans of america.

yau sau taasiatna, I say, Satan

June 1, 2014

everything is metal,
And if you mettle with the metal,
You become metal.

Our mind and eyes is gaseous and airy,
Reaching out of itself, perceiving a metal, compared to our mind, all around.
Our mind, a mere degree, of much stronger mental metal.

(I would say “Nouemic” but while heavy metal beneath brain cell’s froth, it’s black remains ooze be so somewhere in brains’ aloft-down there, a combination, of forces under and of—-that we have to get at at, and grab the palpable) 

And this metal is Satan.
And Satan is everywhere and everything.
Acting as one. ****** (tune in)
To the portal out your mind, to where the actions of the dark prince be one

Our mind came late into what has long been,
And so what has long been, long filled us up,
Till satan be so, in everyone,
And Satan be a small part of me; not by any choice, but that we came long into satanic dominion

Satan is not of the future, but from the past;
So clinging to the present, like sail-wind a mast

Satan the Republican, As if Satan has no hope,
From my mental clarity, a better world elope.

Then Appollo rears his head, after the wettening storm,

Where is the center of it all, but radiating his lighting rays?
Earth under some standard contract,
Appollo beaming bright,
Here we are some lesser moment
And pith thats still all right

Here we are in sun and light, of mind and sun;
Easier to expell spirit, then satan’s work undone.

See, there is some metaphysical metal,
Before us, or, implanted in the mind of Earth,
Yet, not from Earth. galavanizing something.

Aw, see, it is Satan, Satan did it, does it;
Is responsible for all of this;
Were we not of Satan, we would have done better;
At least now, we have something to blame, and work through.
Satan: Satan is holding you back:
Only something satanic, could hold you back.
So blame Satan and move forward;
Don’t let higher power help you;
Blame Satan, and reason forth (your life is umaneagble because of satan)

—A predicament, here, and foreigñ, to be oppressed by Satan;
-Jacob and Joseph went through something like it too.
Do you help your oppressor, and if so how?
Or continue to resist his rule and fuitley rue?

the material world blurs with the tv, as images are transmitted over space;
Conduit pipes wires of electricity from added value earth, like another sun; for light and heat;
If you can imagine, the same is so in Satan; the not there yet there, an image, of reality;

For humans are not the only Satan conquers and controls;
Nor even earth, the first planet;

How is this possible? How can Satan take over a planet of Humans? Does the Spirit even ask?
It is because Satan is superfine, and we are only fine; and those years asking “are you fine” ignorant of the superfine’s effect on the fine;
Fine is not enough.
Because Satan has a superfine wire or fiber transmitting Satan, to each of you, us.
Satan connects the vast darkness to each, through some superfine wire, to our brains.
It’s a wire of darkness, perceived by the imagination, fainter i what we see,

Satan is not some beast, but with the superfine capacity for taking over whole planets.

This implies Satan has changed form from what once was over time; parallely, earth is forced to adapt and find other forms of life than nature.
This implies satan communicates among its parts; conversely, the human form is enjoyed aggregate and in parts.

Yes something can be in our brain. Something can be in their brain. How did it get there? You have to see the brain as a source; that is then connected to other sources; and that those other sources were here first, and therefore, our organic quality: We, Earth, is inside, It.

It is finely tuned, fine tuned, to operate us, to control, and connect us; to operate you, a very remote finety.

There is very little energy wasted; what is needed, in its direction, flew, flows, files forth.
In that sense, other directions may be choked out; and what little energy, left and needed, remains forsoothe

Journalists, not there.
The pin pricks of humanity in space, the comfort, of the comfort, we provide outer space;
This is where we rest all day and night, upon such dark downy pillow;
Yet even such darkness, not as black; as our contant reminders, things are worse than Earth;
the constant remainder we remind with tragedy; we will our control, of this satanic earth;

You can’t imagine places worse than Earth:
You can’t imagine, how great Humans are:
And you can’t imagine, how this roused the Metal-Ire Satan;

The chokehold upon us, our comparison to the Universe;
Realize you are in the Universe: How many things are fake, relative.
Phenomenology through this, with me. For instance; the comfort of universal components, less than us.
less than us, making on less

For universal components, we give a great deal to; this is the hard part, and the importance of seeing opportunity.
In the loss of a great fraction;

There are places worse than Earth, that we deep down feel.
The weakened left sidedness is lost to.; the metal is using yours and our brains;
Our government does not know what it is doing;}

Unless in its interior, inscrutinable, inferior dawn of awakening; government realizes, things are not right.
HSee, you cant imagine something worse than earth, I can’t, lest it dawning all around.

You must see Earth as an astronaut, whose even green hue; pales the whole universe before her, to astronaut eyes;
That Earth, even as added as this; babble awash in metal; even with human minds mere pinpricks cheering a distant harder outerspace; is several times as good.
Jesus said, we are in a world of sin, the kingdom of god makes us o Jesus did not ascribe this tragic nature to Satan.
Because satan censors.

Now what we have to see, is the nature of man and women under Satan,and in Sin; For it is not a natural or nature intended of us, so to speak.
Thus, to speak to man, so mechanical and twisted in sin, one must guide, and lead, to something which at this level, must be in a world historical context;
Insofar the media beginning to understand this, has long not understood this, gaining a trenchhold here, by recognizing the trenchhold here,
Is bound to ramification everywhere media grows, and deserving the issue.

A little light in darkness, commands those sensing the light.

 Yet Satan’s, ….The metal’s…..The ways of darkness….The fractures of black……

This is going to be hard for you,
But you are so close to me
As to go through the terror
And go through the horror,  

And that feeling something has been taken from you:
That we can deal with something important; and the dealing not stop, once established: by proximity, terror, and from that, talking.
Diplomatic rights, taken away, asserted, a welcome relief.

You see, men, this is about World History
Treating The Introduction of Satan, with respect;

This is about seeing the snake peak out of imaginary earth
And you understand the hole he comes from, good.

You see, my friends, this is Middle Earth:
Not way above, our minds in space;
But the universe avast below,
Reaching up, to us.

Where brains, and sources mix
An immediate equilibrium,
And the ways of darkness
Fracture without a laugh
Like an opague mirror visible through
While still at This level,
Mind expands into Space;
And outerspace Must be mind,
The darkness must be the borders of something else ongoing so important;
That the fearful deservedly laugh at me.

The Sources of Middle Earth, The Right Here, How heavy, Metal, is.
Makes an immediate midpoint that is middle earth

As Earth, and we, are in the middle of the universe,
though our mind contemplate stars, and blend shadows,
the leaning, loomed, luminious,
pinpricks in space,
Be away from the beast able to prey, by being more exquisitely composed;
Here, we logically try to have the gall to assume talking.

You see, we are, world history, there is some source energy spent on that, creating this.
It’s a simple matter of inflowing this information with the energy floating swiftly about about me.

For this media to trickle and subvert your media; reroute the river to protect your city;
For the media to know the news flows through them, flows through them,
That we can stop it, by recognizing, it flows through made up, because satan has transformed us;
So it is to be influenced by satan, to the most critical news………….

If somehow we can talk about what we lost, and are;
It will be established, and establish itself, and the new establishment, more functional, than this old one.-

Man is with Sin; Man is no high rank nor capability. Do not ignore this. Knowing-truth is good -

But what keeps from us negotiating with Satan? Man? Man is inbetween God and Satan? Heavy metal?
People need to hear; but what else can Satan direct; but everything possible.
The moral tones of the least first and the best worst

Say Satan did that to us? Then what? Is the equation?
And is the equation a lever to move earth?

Prop-o-gand-a in the USA and Rome

May 27, 2014

Chap 3

It is a different beast when Polybius speaks of Greek History. His view describing as wide a world of affairs as possible, reflects his theory, world history is united and related. His account of the Aetolian and Achean league wars, graphically document the factional violence differring Greek History from Rome. But then he cuts to a culture of Arcadian sacred herds, and culture of music, and singing poetry, and customs of hospitality, conflicting with the massacres and confiscations of Arcadian political history. Again the broach between politics and culture is cited, as broad, as between Tribalism and History in Italy. The two party or two faction polities of Greek Cities were all or nothing affairs, with bonds and loyalties greater than citizenry.

But Culturally, Polybius reveals, studying singing was mandatory many years, thus enacting a tradition of education around singing and song; extending into singing contests for each age. Is this wonderful, and tribal custom; or the introduction of state education, its taking of time from the individual, and resulting in artistic, but possibly not construed as productive or benefitting, contests; mirroring our years of education often for jobs that require much less, for which more time would blossom more learning, were not the capstone of knowledge the kingdom of god, and the kìngdoms of god and heaven reigned in by the universe.

Clearly their swapping songs around campfires and mastery of singing, is a sophisticated way of improving society. And yet one wonders the extent of their practice; was it like band practice?

Polybius concludes this anecdote, saying the Cyntheans, suffered the worst factionalism, because they ceased the singing tradition, a singing tradition that was used to compensate for the rocky terrain, and high hills, of the region, that made life difficult enough to require singing to soften the hardship. For those who have ever complained of colorado’s long winters, perhaps culture singing would help. I mean that’s all the lesson poybius offers upon this story of concurrent greek history, with the clear moral, singing is especially needed in harsh terrain. We would be hard pressed to call this propoganda, tending to instructive instead.

He tells the story of Phillip seiging a city, and hearing the concurrent great loss of Rome to Hannibal in the battle of trasimene. In the beginning of the story, there is a carciture of greek political thought constituted as a plan for King Phillip to attacK Italy and so unite Greece, now that Rome was weak, in the striking theatrical light, of taking advantage of a weakened Rome. Then the light shifts to the reasonable light, that whoever wins, Carthage or Rome, will then take over Greece, which History shows did happen; thus creating the real issue of whether to preemptively attack as united greece, Italy. Then a peace conference of warring greeks under Phillip, the Aetolians and Achean leagues decided it wiser, not to, given the immensity of the warring armies in Italy. However, in a speech, this reason was categorized as the wisdom of ceasing war between the greeks, and tending the military, so as to be prepared for the Victor of Italy.

This speech is interesting as it noted how greek can not speak as one voice and not war, but cross the river together, uniting against the barbarians, and preserving their cities. This evokes the call for America;s Republic, as a tacit and cited unity against the indians, more known as the reason for uniting diverse regions as it is now. It is ignorance that we and the world doesnt realize the purpose for our federal government as protecting us from barbarians, precisely as greek with its disjointed cities and shifting leagues, was unable to attain, from menacing tribes all around Greece, that Rome was able to achieve in europe, and America, here. One can look at Greece, and see the attacks upon them, even warlording tribes Lord Byron took on, ruled greece two hundred years ago.

But this subtley leads to the important question of whether a republic, such as here and Rome, clamps down on factional fighting, a city state, or state system, in Greece, was unable to suppress, as the alternative to our effete federal government is a system of fifty state with several regions or leagues, factional fighting. When factions fight, one side becomes or hides behind the government it controls, and so can do whatever it wants; this is the nature of the civilized constitutional state we have. Distant government, policing itself, essentially unchecded by the people it secretly outside history’s eye, or openly, oppresses, structurally provides an opportunity for crime and oppression, as the people don’t have an effective check on the government, when the government polices itself; a problem here, in greece, and rome, historically and currently; which it is very hard to do something about.

But we have to ask does the unifying of states, and curtailment of state rights to diplomacy and treaty, by ending conflict and war between states, in America, and Italy; create the factional violence Greek is marked by, and America and Rome, held off? Is there something about fifty states, all with diplomatic liscence, that will then lead to conflict between states, and then factional viciousness arise within individual states, as the blue ideologies will support eacch other across state lines, as will the red, and so the resources of factions beyond their states, lead to the fomenting and fronting of factions, which as potential organs for regional sympathies, lose a conscience regarding local rule, as has happened in N.J. As local officials are ruled by the statewide democratic machine, they allowed oppressive developments and destruction of natural resource, the local people found very unpopular; simply because local officials, beholden to state party, could not stand up to the interests of greed and money; which in itself, is only explanable by a civilization and history, where higher power manipulates the humans insofar as this higherr power manipulation is neither known, nor noted, and then unable to be stood up to, as governmend and media so too be, and the people rail complain and cry oppression, without uniting or changing through reason, arguing against higher power, without recognizing such. (Change)

One clearly sees, as Polybius turns his attention to the amazing imperial phenonoma of Rome, that Rome was designed for expansion and suceeded by achiveing a hegemony over italian tribes, and not driving them to a different continent; and how that was a moral imperative to their expansion, and why American imperialism beyond california and hawai and alaska, has stopped; you can’t go forward in a native world, when you drove out and exterminated natives, And yet Rome was more duplicitioius than this, in that taking care of the tribes they conquered, they enforced an italian unity, essential to further imperialism. Whereas America had a steady influx of europeans needing land, and providing calvary; also indicating the low density and smaller numbers of the indians, given their nomadic propensity as well.

Chap 2

The History of the Roman Republic is versed in propoganda, or memorialization, far more than America, and in this sense, borders on russian culture, and more so, the specific goals of propoganda one saw in Soviet Russia.

One of the few military losses of Rome’s 800 year republic, was at Cannae, to Hannibal, in the second punic war. Hannibal’s soldiers were men with years in the trade, who had hiked to Italy winning all their preseason battles with gallic and spanish tribes along the way from Spain. They were career soliders, whereas a good chunk of the Roman men were young and conscripted for the emergency that was Hannibal.

The romans had two consuls, or presidents, and would lead at the front, travel with the army, and they would alternate power by the day, if they couldnt agree, so they were both at the front, Fabius, moderate, cautious, grooming troops through highly limited engagements, and Varro, and later mInicus, whose rashness led to the huge loss at Cannae, where Hannibal tricked them, by hiding men in hollows of a field at night, to mabush in the mroning, and positioning his troops, so the romans cut through the center flank, only to be pinched in, for which Hannibal sacrificed the naked gallic troops, and the spaniards, with their national dress of short purple embroidered linen tunics, like miniskirts. The galls believed in fighting naked.

So the lesson, for all to see, was, caution, and prudence wins, for the romans were lured rashly into attacking. Fabius was against it, the rash co-consul, ordered it. And in the previous month, fabius had rescued his co-consul’s army from doon, so Polybius wrote, “How (edit names cautious generals) the forsight, logical thinking and cool calculation of a general, differ from the rashness and bravado of a mere soldier.”

This moral lesson, mirrored the famed roman personality,, as one of prudence, ideally wisdom, and superior logicall reasoning in a spock like detached, and ultimatle ystatist way. The effect of this cultural trailt, of this trait inculcated in every rendition of the story, was really for the roman people to accept things, not complain, wait and see, be conscripted, and so accept the dominion of the roman state. “Prudence” as propoganda, leads to a passive and accepting dispostion to something oppressive. A greater culture would promote, thinking together, and the form for coming up with a plan to get around and combat oppression. Caution, should include, opportunity, and opportunity, success: But this roman homily, isnt about opportunity and triumph over success, but the roman virtues that enable roman perserverance; a perserverance against oppostion, opposition that is psychologically blended as both Rome’s own government, and the Hanniballic North Africa invaders out of Carthage.

Then of course, we must add, the practice of the Roman state, alternating power by the day; is where the wholesome nature of the roman republic comes from, paling though, as it does, before the Gallic and tribal homily of daily noon circles open to all; and promotes, alternating power does, the ideaa change is good, and the household practice, most of all of sharing power, and rotating power. This is thus a housefold homily most of all, and conforms to a householdization, consistent with the state, at odds with Tribal hegemonies, allegiances, and bonds. Alternating power by consuls, as much as a president rules a vice-president, conforms to nursury ryhmes of propiety, and sinister social ways of corrupted older teens, where a dominance and subservience is assumed between friends. Sharing, is in the way, of property ownership, which is in the way of tribal understandings, which have been subverted by democratic/communistic movements, in the classical, and modern world. Both had essential subversions of humane tenddencies by organization for the people, like the office of tribune, and political parties, and judges, by this reckoning, that essentially acted against the people, allowing republicans and patricians, with their military ties, to prevail, far too often.

The cultural effect of the galls fighting naked would be an intrinsic resistance to civillizing influences. A national dress for the spaniards, would translate into a spanish uniformity. Unifomity can be used to conform good, or conform evil.

Romulus and Regulus, were raised by shephed parents on the river tiber, and became juvenile deliquents rallying others to break the bonds of their senrios, and brigand with Romulus and Regulus. This rough nontribal upbringing,, by negligient outcast parents is actually a very humbling myth or story, reminding romans, they come, not from a tribe, or rather, community structure, but bad negligient parents, who let them form juvenile deliquents, that go on to conquer the tribes, their brigadier friends came from. This inauspicion makes it very humble to be Roman, and in a wholesome way, inclucates the famous part of their personality, of humility, moderation; always at odds with their self-considerations of their military prowess.

Chap 1

Gonna show a quick comparison between   propoganda the white house puts out on its whitehouse website description or explanation of The Constitution of the United States;  and Cicero’s writings. This will show how similiar the historical culture of the two are; as well as pivotal differences:

For instance, in Rome, only the rich were allowed to be senators, something originally defined as a class, presumably with a better section of the city. Thus therefore,  Cicero’s glorification of past Roman generals, is grounded in the notion theìr greatness comes from serving the state. This is psychologically deconstructed as,  remaining from the law, only the patrician class can be senators, and therefore this service, makes Rome, greater and greater. Rome’s greatness stems  from its wealthier citizens, controlling society, and making Rome greater; fairly easy to see self-serving propoganda by and for the ruling class, outright positing their republic’s greatness on the legal assertion of superiority being associated with wealth and property. 

Does our polity still lean this way? Why don’t we know, one proposal at the great constitutional convention, was a senator or two from each trade, representing states and the people. Alexander Hamilton, argued against this logic, that mercantilists, owing an allegiance to no trade soley, were better suited to represent the republic. This country would be better off, if people skilled in production, had more sway.

Roman propoganda is about the superiority of the rich, and how only allowing the rich to hold office, led to the greatness of the roman republic. American Propoganda is not an assertive one, but a passive ignorance, that the way our government is, was designed in large part, to take land from the indians. Our propoganda merges with Rome’s also in an ignorance that a government policing itself, enables people behind the government to enact systemic crime without fear of government.

Cicerro starts On the Common Wealth: “without a sense of public duty, Manius Curius, Gaius Fabricus and Tiberious Coruncanicus, would not have freed Italy from the attack of pyrrhus….Duelius, Atilius, and Mettellus would have not banished the fear of Carthage….without it, the two Scipios, would not have quenched with their own blood the rising fire of the second punic war.”

“The need and love for noble actions, which nature has given to men so they may defend the common weal, are so compelling that they have overcome all the enticements of pleasure…” for those who believe in the challenges of state, rather than a life of ease.

“Noble Actions” are essentially military behaviors to essentially and consistently, expand the Roman Republic. And yet the sentence can be construed to compell any noble actions that defend the common weal. Thus, literarily understanding the concentration of power in patricians, as facilitating immoral greedy and foolish crime; insofar the patricians were not really policed, being the only class allowed to serve Government, for which the Propoganda of Cicero, and the sense of serving your country, militarily, as a public servant, or patriot,, subverted and hard as that is, is derived.

The notion of a formal state, being greater than, an individual, so close to military culture, implying a potential and actual conduit of military dominance of civilian government, is understood as the concept taking the tribesman from his tribe, and putting him in a state. This equation, is negative to sensibility enough to encompass this consumption of government. Thus the same cultural spirit, that dominates ancient Egypt, as National Socialism, exists in Rome, as obesiance to the state, and for and by the upper class, as well, this last implying a greater òppression of the upper class. And in America this is most seen in an enforced education, that takes the ultimate responsibility of rearing and parenting, and putting a very large proportion of that in the literal hourly regulation of minors and so family, through school.

Cicero’s virtue of government service, ignores tribal community circles, in amplifying the value of extensive and distant state. He goes on the believe in the power of great laws, to enforce good behavior, to the benefit of all, citing one philosopher’s greatness, as teaching students the reasons for particular good laws. In other words, laws enforce the training he teaches. This loses sight that training, the acting for good effects in a way not necessarily intuitive, explains the principles behind its withholdings and expenditures; there should be no enforcement of good laws in theory, without reasons being easily understandible. I believe that is the principle of our ninth amendment, if a right is denied or disparaged, it must be retained; and such retention, would naturally involve the explanations for its principles of reform or order.. This overarched philosophy, of Cicero’s understanding, good laws, handed down from the upper class, will create a good society in general, is propoganda justifying the superiority of the upper class; something most humble people know, is often the oposite. Sterling’s condemnation of Blacks, must be discussed. What is he worried about? Does his anxiety stem from violence to women from black males; Whatever the catalyst, this needs discussion and reason, not repression, and sweeping under the rug with strong discipline; yet any discussion of racial anxieties and conversion to harmonies, might threaten to expose the NBA as promoting anxieties, more than harmonies. Likewise, what was causing Eliot Rodgers anxieties towards women? A society that cream puffs intimiacy, and overvalues sex, to the exact loss of more positive and meaningful qualities and concern? And yet again, why would and did Kate Hudson go out with Alex Rodriguez? Honestly, what is possible there. One wants so much to ask her. And what would her answer be? It’s a discussion that requires answers, and not sweeping questions, anxieties and discussion, under the rug.

Cicero’s case, that statesmen are superior to teachers, as the former compell a good behavior from many, while teachers can only teach, a few, is based on the risky supposition of enforcing behavior without explaining it; something civilization grounds its one way street from tribalism, exactly in. Yet it is historically clothed in a dominance of the upper class as an evil propogater; conversely free the lower class from a pressure-packed scrutiny, and effectively making the upper class, almost buffoonish, in their false justifications. It is tautological and self-reifying; Cicero: “we are powerfully moved to increase the resources of the human race, since we desire by our planning and toiling to make life safer and richer”.

While this ignores the logic of tribal peace, increasing the resources of the human race, is a thin disguise for increasing the population, and this supposition merges with the fact, there is a material wealth to civilization, prima facie inexplicable across the grain of logic, civilization is. But that’s the deal. A decrease is sensibility, for an increase in material wonder, ambiguos if it is. …”since we are spurred on to this agreeable task, by nature herself, let us perservere in that course, ever chosen by the best of men.”

Cicero assumes the state is the only source for justice, shame, common law, morality, reverence. Whereas community and the people engender such superiorly to what has been demonstrated by History in the past, and we are all a part of; difficult as it is to talk about, means we must start with me, and accepting the initiation of dialogue on world history as a plannable thing, derived with references like this.

Cicero says brave good politicians, would sooner die for their country, than grow old. This is the modern mantra for necessary wars today as well.
He then cites greek histories with their exiles and bipolar dysfunctions, where Themosticles, and other exiles, always found work for the traditional enemy Persia, to compare Rome favorably to. The greeks were more understanding of the desperate quality to good culture, and more open-minded, in good and bad ways.



” The need for the Constitution grew out of problems with the Articles of Confederation, which established a “firm league of friendship” between the states, and vested most power in a Congress of the Confederation. This power was, however, extremely limited — the central government conducted diplomacy and made war, set weights and measures, and was the final arbiter of disputes between the states. Crucially, it could not raise any funds itself, and was entirely dependent on the states themselves for the money necessary to operate. Each state sent a delegation of between two and seven members to the Congress, and they voted as a bloc with each state getting one vote. But any decision of consequence required a unanimous vote, which led to a government that was paralyzed and ineffectual.A movement to reform the Articles began, and invitations to attend a convention in Philadelphia to discuss changes to the Articles were sent to the state legislatures in 1787. In May of that year, delegates from 12 of the 13 states (Rhode Island sent no representatives) convened in Philadelphia to begin the work of redesigning government. The delegates to the Constitutional Convention quickly began work on drafting a new Constitution for the United States.”

This is just not true. The number one reason for a constitution of the united states, according to the Federalist Papers, their prime proponent, was to unite the states in defense of the indians and europeans. The second reason, and less urgent reason, was to make conflict between the states impossible. Those were and are the main reason for the negative of the United States government; a subservience to unity in war, and binding of state autonomy from state conflicts.

Additionally, Patrick Henry argued, post war events the decade before the convention, did not merit such amputation of state autonomy, or swaddling of defense resources in one centràl organization; that that decade of 1780’s was a great prosperous decade, with a great feeling to it; that the shift from confederacy to federal government, was a greater shift than the freeing of ourselves from Britain; while their was minor conflict between militias of Pennsylvania and Connecticut, and Shay’s Rebellion, demanding promised veteran’s benefits, did cause concern, these weren’t big deals, and the federal government ending up making conditions worse. The only example of disorder requiring a federal government given by this current government was funding. And yet look how today government funding is out of control. Many states did not want a standing army. Look at militaries now. Nor did the U.S. Constitution pass state conventions by anything but narrow margins.

The notion funding issues caused the Constitution, is false, by its greatest advocates who said the main reason is a united defense, and states friendly to each other, and no tarrifs.m


” According to the Federalist Papers, which makes the case for a federal government in 1788, the six main reasons for a federal government are following in order of importance.1) To stop States from warring each other over disputed Territories.2) To provide a large Navy so England, France and Spain wouldn’t abuse us.3) So that states which goods are transported through will not impose duties, imposts, and levies on trade passing through.4) So that states don’t compete with each other foolishly in trade pacts with Europe.5) So that the federal government can directly raise an army, rather than each state contributing men.6) To be able to quell insurrections in states, should they happen.” {from above}

So let’s examine this propoganda relegating the debate over whether and what kind of constitution the states and people should have, to an issue of government funding? “They” don’t want you to recognize most of the above reasons are outdated. The information, that our cause, ended to the degree, the indian worry ended; would have us change our constitution; as much as its notable flaws of concentrating power to protect crime, and unleasing the designed might of the United States, threateningly, upon the world.

This isn’t the passionate, psuedo moralistic fervor of roman cicero, singing paeans to the state. This is cold clinical propòganda; a little thing; the reason for our constitution; they shifted from a united defense, to funding issues; nor much discussion of what specifically triggered the need for this constitution. Was it rolled up in the war deal itself? Was the constitution this way, the effect of the well-known momentum from war?

Cicero is offering his countrymen and readers moralistic fervor bottled in government ideals, passion, for justice, and righteousness, even if deviously directed. There’s no passion coming from cold dry america and its whitehouse, while the people are the best, the regulations of school and capitalism, the restrictions on communities thinking together by local officials, the inhibition and scarcity upon diverse religions; it’s neither fun, nor holy, but sacrifice in civilization’s veil.

Cicero in upper class bluster, conveys it’s fun and ideally righteous to be roman, and roman government, that spirit-style exists in the interactions of americans; this white house lie, is simply about misinforming you, and keeping the origins and causes of your government secret; because if you knew, you would change its structure; it’s so stark as to not allow the whitehouse to be honest regarding the constitution’s reason’s, because people would know the indians are no longer a threat. You would see how this country was designed to run through indian land, and that goal, past. Phrased right, you might see what a great mistake it was to not get along with indians, give them whole states or regions, and interact with, not destroy, their culture.

The irony-connundrum, is an accurate whitehouse explanation of our constitution, would effectively disprove it. Our government has not been that honest, as government, long a force, for-itself. What makes it for-iteself, has gone on a long time, and not giving up. Any real discussion of this, commences with the rarety of this issue being raised, and from there, a praxis to world history. What it is, is we are men of sin, to be led out of terror by a little light.

” A chief aim of the Constitution as drafted by the Convention was to create a government with enough power to act on a national level, but without so much power that fundamental rights would be at risk. One way that this was accomplished was to separate the power of government into three branches, and then to include checks and balances on those powers to assure that no one branch of government gained supremacy. This concern arose largely out of the experience that the delegates had with the King of England and his powerful Parliament. “

Let’s deconstruct this statement. First, the checks and balances of government branches, fundamentally and inescapably, involves government policing itself, and at many levels and instances, this does not work, or even make sense from a structural stand point, and the main problem with the constitution, is enforcing its laws, which in turn, requires stepping over a three branch system, that has fundamentally, repeatedly worked to purposefully not do so. In this sense, as government created to protect and enable criminal structures that operate without regard to laws, as laws need not be enforced upon those more powerful and committed than government. Thus our complaints regarding England, were wealthy people complaining of British power and people, enabling corruption through government, and not a form of government itself. I am not sure there is evidence, oppression of America, by the British, was posited on a king system, or british system of government, but an imperialism known to various forms of government, throughout history.

Again, this second paragraph from the whitehouse, continues the impressive considerable propoganda that government can police itself. And this is a huge issue. Any reform of government must clearly see government can not police itself. Power must be diffused to more overcome crime and corruption

“Two plans competed to become the new government: the Virginia Plan, which apportioned representation based on the population of each state, and the New Jersey plan, which gave each state an equal vote in Congress. The Virginia Plan was supported by the larger states, and the New Jersey plan preferred by the smaller. In the end, they settled on the Great Compromise (sometimes called the Connecticut Compromise), in which the House of Representatives would represent the people as apportioned by population; the Senate would represent the states apportioned equally; and the President would be elected by the Electoral College. The plan also called for an independent judiciary.”

This is a gross reduction of the jersey plan insofar it ignores the Jersey Plan allowed treaties between states, trade pacts; this the virginia plan was against, and the effect, I think, was negative upon the economy, and quality of culture. Moreso, the federal judiciary, was limited, under the jersey plan, to the approval of these state pacts, as well as treaties made by the federal government. This is a substantively liberal creation of a judiciary. The state judiciaries, would handle most crime if not all, as the jersey plan did not make the federal judiciary concerned with crime, but moral relations between states, and states and countries, as where a judiciary should go, to check states free to make pacts and treaties with each other.

First the virginia plan: ” The “Virginia Plan” specifically spells out five items necessarily intrinsic to the constitution. Protection against foreign invasion. Eliminating war and tension between the states. Secure a peacetime prosperity. Prevent internal insurrection. “Be paramount to state u

The Virginians objection to the confederacy included the havoc of different paper monies, inability to raise funds and soldiers, foreign debts, insurrection in Massachusetts: Citing an inability to legally unite in war, a lack of primacy hindering peace between the states, and failure towards the stated goals of the confederacy, “common defense, security of liberty and general welfare.”” from https://vicfedorov.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/american-obsolescence-and-evolution/

“The Virginia Plan advocated individuals electing their representatives. Others claimed the people would be ill informed, nor to be so much about government. Mr. Gerry, “The people do not want virtue but are the dupes of pretended patriots.” Thus state legislatures should decide their national representatives.Mr Mason, of Virginia, argued that general elections would enable the lower classes to represent localities, and this would create a greater and more dynamic lower house. Mr Wilson took it even further, arguing for a mandate guaranteeing the lower classes places in the lower house. This would increase confidence in the nation. Confidence is essential. State legislatures should not have more power. “

Roman propoganda extolls a greatness to the state by extolling the concept of representative democracy whereby theoretically superior people rule lesser people to an overall greatness of reputation of state. They also frame this in context of kings, rather than tribal community local rule.

“Hence because they could not bear the rule of kings, they made the chief magistracy annual and created two magistrates with military authority. They were called “consuls” from the verb meaning to consult, not “kings” from the verb, “to reign”.”…….But the act Valerius. …showed himself to be a friend of the people…was the law…prohibiting, …executing or flogging….without permitting an appeal to the centuries” The centuries were peaceful assemblies of honored soldiers to make decisions with ayes and nays..

“Publico, was a man of no mean ability since he made it easier to maintain the authority of the nobility, by giving freedom in moderation to the people.” ; a nice political process, but paling before a sopisticated and working and thinking together people and community.

American propoganda ignores the federal government is grounded in uniting the states against the Indicans. American propoganda covers up where this land comes from, and tribal understandings. American propoganda obscures that states do not have diplomatic powers, because such might have confused or subverted “manifest destiny” of taking land from native tribes, (as Rome did to Italian tribes)


We are bound to note, how the people and public knowledge conform to the propoganda put out on the white house annotated website. In this act, while consistent with thusly implicated textbooks, the white house shows how effortlessly, and deceptively, government, and media, blur.

The direct correllation between official information and public knowledge, disturbing. Liberals nor conservatives care about our recent history with “indians”. The people aren’t aware of structural shortcomings in our constitution; particular, they are. So why haven’t the people found out, nor the knowledge disseminated? Well, that is exactly the mechanical nature of man, in this post-mechanical age, who must be led from sin with light, this light, of course establish what we are talking about, since we are such a product of world history, this dialgoue becomes incorporated in world history.

From here can be a very interesting discussion.

Everything conforms to propoganda; Rome’s senate provided and honored military heroes and consuls, for hundreds of years, unchecked and undiverted. Americans don’t recognize the moral issue with the native tribes. The government has yet to free itself to announce its faults. The notion government is the strongest force and can stand up to the nefarious and outright influences upon it, is easily seen as unsound, and yet the illusion government can stop crime,, particularily by the powerful, is acted upon everyday.. The senators could get away with a lot, there can be no tears for the all the tribes once roamed and settled, for 1200 years beyond the dark ages’s destruction of the classicism of tribal backdrop of europe and around the mediterraen.

In both cases the control is absolute; as if, and truly, agreed upon to go down on the human race, in the past; we were given up and sold a bill of goods.


Now the glorification of the rich as leading rome to greatness and the obscuring of the moral issue of taking land from native tribes, are two different kinds of propoganda.
One is assertion, the other, an ignoring. So those are two different natures.

Before I get into the nature of this difference, let me say, both Rome and the USA, merge in the passive propoganda of obscuring how government policing itself, allows networks to hide behind government and oppress, and even kill, and steal, and that’s an issue to constitutional republics everywhere.

Let me also say, both American and Roman propoganda, are in the obscuring, ignoring business, as the relegate and dismiss tribal understandings, and also to an extent, deceptively replace pagan tribal understandings with idealizations of government and government service, in a removed from the people, distant, government that has little check upon its total by the people.

The assertion of the superiority of the patrician class, over the plebian class, as an assertion, is not prima facea believable. And yet, the belief and veneration of our founders as creating a perfect government, for some reason, is believable. The ignorance, the binding of states, and altering of articles of confederation into constitution, was to facilitate land from indians, is trickier to disbelieve, because it is not an assertion, but an ignoring.

Christianity, positing its service and terms as countering government service and terminology, would assume, salvation, a community based on truth, truth of the kingdom of god, is possible, by virtue of its service, by virtue of an applying congregation, and christian scholarship. And yet, this break from historical reality, is more likely in the pagan roman republic by the plebes, precisely because the puffing up of the superiority of the rich, flies in the face of experience, so to speak.

The old testament, in assertion of judeasm, jewish history, as part of its very specific focus on Hebrew history, is the property of ignorance, obscuring the pagan pantheon judeasm replaces. Anytime, one set of information, effectively replaces another, this is the propoganda grounded in not allowing certain information, or conflicting understandings.

This propoganda that ignores, that replaces, without referencing what it replaces, is more difficult to overcome than that of assertion.

We revere our founders, despite their creation of a federal government with scant checks on it by the state or the people, perhaps because our propoganda we are a classless society, at least compared to the roman republic when it limited public office to the rich, effectively ends the lower class looking down on the upper classes, as those required bonds, bound in a tribal tradition rome incorporated or was incorporated by, we don’t have.

The severe two class division of rome, enables a salvation, grounded in tribal paganism, unknown to history, that America doesn’t have.

Thus a class system with spiritual and community diversity, is more effective, than the countering service of organized religion, or our own bible studies.

In the propoganda of ommission, of taking land from tribes, of the pagan pantheon, of ignoring known alternatives, is difficult as it creates a void or false substance of our mind, without alternative, so that is all there is for our mind to rely on, given the currents of media.

This in turn shows, how limited and restricted our mind is, by propoganda. The same mind that fuels and puts out propoganda, is in our mind, limiting itself by its chosen dictates of propoganda. A discussion of this, shows, we are directly limited by propoganda, unable to think, outside propoganda, official, cherished, propoganda. Why is this, and how to combat it, becomes the next issue.

It would seem there are two types of people. Now there are three issues I like to discuss with people. Propoganda, and why and how it has its effect on you. The kingdom of god’s tragic nature. And how to stop, check and control the evil flowing through society through our media primarily, but people in power secondarily, and people in general, tertiarily.

But there are two types to discourse with. 1) The people, and 2) Journalists, media people; officials, government, people with power,; and their oppressed minions. The second, is where bad things mostly flow through, onto our tv screens, soaking our investment in leadership with status quo, and violations. Less bad things enemate from the people, than TV, government, and those behind that. Because of that, those in power are distant from the people, and also less capable of the humanity required to check evil, or rather, less possessive of the humanity that would reduce their involvement in their dirty work. It’s two different divisions, an unaccesible and inferior division of power; and a more accessible superior, yet less potent and empowered, division of the people. Nevertheless, the message is basically the same; bad things flow by design, because we are the kingdom of god, camouflaged it may be, and if we recognize we are the kingdom of god, then we can check this impulse and stealth upon us by evil.

Regarding propoganda, it is very interesting also; officials and anchors, law enforcement and judges, senators and aids, editors and rich people, must see through the propoganda, because what the propoganda hides is applied upon them to oppress them, others, they must know, government isnt the strongest power, judges and law enforcement co-opted by stronger power, and thin veneer of crime, be right behind the appearance of law and order society. Whereas the people who dont know this yet, are marks and dupes to be hurt and exploited through constitutional design allowing this oppression. Again, for this, the official category has more control upon it than the people, and thus discussing real politic with the empowered is difficult to attain.

Regarding expressing the tragedy of the kingdom of god, and cognating such apprehension, the two classes would seem together.

In Rome, evil flows through History deciding upon the higher class. In America, more through contemporary journalism. Regarding, propoganda, as said, the historical are aware of it, but inaccesible bt in some literary world unto themselves, and the lower classes freer fromit and under pagan tribal remnants, possibly able to manifest class seperation into a secret greater freedom.

When Cicero’s charactors are talking in the courtyard of their upper class country estate, and says how on the battle field, one is looked up to as the superior warrior; and yet, in the courtyard, the other is looked up to, being the elder; one is reminded of Roman constitent supremecy in war. One theory is that they had a greater military culture than the surrounding
Italian tribes, and by marching out to the contours of their hegemony, and invading, the marching, or the armies roaming, engendered a superiority. Hannibal took Italy by storm because he marched there from spain. Pro athletes are so good, because they literally play more basketball games in a year than me. Veteran warring soldiers are superior to young recruits. The roman polity so effficiently roamed italy, by an efficient and constitutional regulation of the army, the story of romulus and regulus, symbolic-manifest; The romans had forced marches, and unforced. Most were unforced. The unforced marches could be well under ten miles a day, and straggling and chatting with the locals you pass, ok, and promoted by the policy of straggling on unforced marches, allowed, just show up at the camp by sunset. Whereas forced marches could be over 15 miles, and regulated by brief and infrequent breaks; This sort of regulation of marching, is universal. And the romans had it down so pat to a milisecond of technique and through, they routinely prevailed in battle.

The other theory is the classical world, did have christs. That that is where the word christ comes from. These christs marched with the army, asserted the kingdom of god, saw the manifest destiny of rome, explained the metaphysic, and thus enabled a secret nonviolent victorious policy.

Now the great crime to constitutional republics is this; they make the government distant from the people, involve few, compared to the distribution of power of the tribal systems it replaces, and essentially only the government polices itself; this check and balance of branches, ridiculous; as the people are hurt by government egress, and so the people should police the government. It’s more important the government is fit, than the people, because the government has the power to do way more damage. Furthermore, networks of crime, such as political parties, can hide behind the government, where jobs are dependant upon going along, and get away with anything, being of more numerous and earnest vow than a few county judges, who grew vulnerable to this system. This is really what went on behind and the cause for the scene of government in athens, rome, and america; though not a part of history, nearly as much as propoganda. For then the whole controversy would stop. A controversy very much requiring spiritualiity, and understanding of metaphysics,’ duration and magnitude.

Thus, the question becomes, is the mechanics one, where the oligarthic nobles are the evil ones, capable of manifesting greed, at the expense of the good of their country? Or is that the work of criminals secretly behind them, in a lawless world, controlling their families, as serfs might take over a noble’s estate and in the isolation, change positions, while outwardly conforming to public view; or where a democratic party can tell businesses what to do; or where a military can tell senators, what to do. This is foil to spiritual explanations, required to turn this boat around.

Let me attempt to categorize and itemize some questionable american claims, to see, how we think we know something, but we don’t.

1. Petition the government for redress of grievance is a very sacred right to ask the government through the judiciary to do something to redress your grievance. I said so to answer a scotus form question, and it was accepted. The right to collect signatures is bs. The right for one mere man to ask the government to do something, truly great.

2.) Capitalism isn’t the wisest thing to get things done; thinking together, community, is.

3) Peaceful Assembly is how and where local decisions are made by all present with ayes and nays; it is not a protest, it is a historically accepted and practiced and cofied natural form of local rule. Casting such as a protest, is showing a similiar connotation of the right of the people to change things, within reason, being shift to the right to ineffectively protest.

4) A first amendment not allowing congress to make a law respecting a religion, leaves open the way for a law disrespecting a religion. This is consistent with the roman republic liscencing the myriad of religions and sects back then, and recognizing that one percent of the religions might not be up to the wholesome of roman par.

USA Pts, prop petitions, prop cap, favorites, also Peaceful assembly……hey disrespect religion.

NBA Play-Off Notes

April 20, 2014

The literary nature takes the time the ceasar with his adjutants don’t. But sometimes things leap to the tarmac, duly recorded.

                                                                                     NBA PLAY-OFF NOTES

Bulls- Wizard   So much of the dc -chicago drama. Is Chicago able to control what they want in washington, by virtue of the chicago ring in the whitehouse? Is it their turn, and they are aquiesced to? Or do greater powers, and greater military influence, induce the chicago ring to bow?  It’s not an easy choice.   Likewise, as the whole is metaphysical, are there chicago metaphysics and more republican metaphysics, in which one can achieve the goal through metaphysical activity; which of course ultimately would be what any conflict between the two or more rings were or are.

So when we watch the series, if we do, I mean, you can just check in a view it for fifteen minutes and get an idea; 1) How effective is bull’s offense. 2) Offense is not as important as defense 3) Is the washington defense preventing anything? 4) It might be a sad game, in that both operating rings are fighting for such bad things. 5) Thus sadness and classiness might be seen

wizards in six

Chap 2

Wizards won in five.

A) in three of he 8 first series, the better team lost, the fix was in; for whatever reason, Portlands defeat of Houston, and The L.A. Clippers defeat of the Warriors, and the Brooklyn Nets defeat of Toronto, all had a worse team beating a better team.

B) Of the remaining series, many went to seven games. The Pacers beat The Hawks, San Antonio beat Dallas, Oaklahoma defeated Memphis. Throw in the fixed games, or so it seems, of toronto-nets and portland Houston, and you have six game sevens.

Now it looks like the seven game series were fake, as other than the suspicious games, the team with the better record won game seven, implying a pattern of creating game sevens for league interest, and then the better team winning.

C) THis is in response to the NFL. The super bowl winners are destined to win by metaphysical reasons. The Seahawks symbolized the desiny of Asia to dominant e the west coast as europe was bale to the east caost. The broncos sysmbolized how wrong it was to take the land from the indians, this is aout injustice and wrong being a destiny of america to recognize, for which you had dominant west coast teams.

If you go by this, Portland will win the NBA West

The western division is much better. The worst western play off team won 44 games. The worst eastern team won 34 games.

While this doesnt rise to the level of investigation reporting, it does rise to that rarfied air of diviner, or prophet, or augurer.

Let’s repeat
It was wrong to kick out the indians, for which the wild broncos did good. However the asians are the civilized cousins to the indians, as the european to the white man here, plus the fairness to asia influencing the west coast, means the seahawks of those northwest winds, symbolized the super bowl.

In which case, its not skill or talent, as much as the control or metapschic that creates this. The NBA is trying to respond to this nfl phenonoma.

In the opening game involving truer teams of the eastern conference, the underdog wizards, who are the better team, I believe, defeated the favored Pacers. But in the game
with a western conference fixed team who other teams lost to consistently throughout the season, the Clippers, defeated the Thunder; even though the thunder are pretty acknowledges as over three years, a great and best team.

If this pattern is followed, frankly it appears the nets are running with the pacers or wizards to drop off like a rocket booster, and so the clippers run along side Portland; like a conference second defending a first in larger play.


The rigged team has been winning, the ones who were lost to in the regular season, portland, and the clippers. Otherwise the wizards very much seem superior to the pacers; though the pacers made mincemeat out of the hawks in game seven.

The point to take away is this; If they can controll NBA games, they can control elections: That’s the serious side to this whole debate.

Chap 3) Miami is beating the helped team brookly 2-1, San Antonio is ripping the rigged team portland, 3-0; and yet, Portland would follow seatles suit, should blacks understand the manifest destiny of Asia in the west coast.

THE CLIPPERS, the team often lost to, are tied with oaklahomo at two games. oaklahoma is a very good team, yet they would let the clippers win in the spirit of MORE TEAMS coming up against miami, and strenghtening the alreadY much stronger western conference with greater market attraction, from more teams generating fame and interest; and the theory teams are basically equal, and it is professional to lose; as you are in league with other professionals regarding an entertainment product.

Indiana is beating wizzards 3-1, even though I have the wizards as the better team.

let’s look at state constitutions vol.1

April 11, 2014


“ARTICLE I Bill of Rights

A DECLARATION OF RIGHTS made by the good people of Virginia in the exercise of their sovereign powers, which rights do pertain to them and their posterity, as the basis and foundation of government.

Section 1. Equality and rights of men.That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, pwhen they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness.”

Virginia was where the reactionary, paranoid, evil, strong federal government, “Virginia Plan” came about, through Madison and the virginia delegation. At the constitutional convention. The virginia plan pointedly included the IRS, standing judges, and signicantly eliminated the Judiciary as being a check on foreign affairs, significantly eliminated the right of states to make trading pacts with each other; and allowed the federal government a supreme criminal rather than civil, designation.

This conservatism or lìberalism, ignores the principle of force, and force that flows through war and violence, through histories. The times of lawlessness, outweigh, any other consideration; as to force a focus on the causes and infections of war; rather than the natural ideal. Sold roses, when we should have bought thorns. And then Virginia assumes the violations of earth’s past, aren’t great enough concerns, perhaps in some abundance and light of America, failing to see the totality of history infers a metaphysic. This universal paganism though, sweeping and vaster, than the present time, moment and earth; and desperationation, conceives the assumptions of virginia, as naive, sugar-coated, conceptions, whose lack of fitness, whose weak constitution, is then desired by the very metaphysical forces who rule us.

Surely this is something to get to the bottom of.

This conservativism or liberalism, ignores, people don’t really own property. If you understand the kingdom of god, you understand property is owned by God and everyone. Civilization is carving out capitalism and false assumptions. We are on these routes. These writings comprise a historical opportunity to shift from a less caring state, through an examination of the true state upon us, that aquiesces to the historical state, to something benefitting the present day and future.

“Section 2. People the source of power.That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.”

This precisely speaks to the problem, is exactly the problem. Vermont and New Hampshire go further I believe, extending into the guarentee of public access, and accountability by office to public in their bill of rights, and certainly it is covered in the traditional state constitutional right of the people to alter and reform government to public benefit.

This so encapsulates the problem I and activists, go through. Government is so far away, especially the stilted Judiciary. If the people have a choice between the people resolving conflict and a government resolving conflict you would want the people. With government controlling conflict resolution, you have factions stronger by many than the few judges power is concentrated in, and the parties powerful enough to control judges, get good at winning and controlling judges, to a point where America is effectively run by some criminal syndicates able to routinely control judges. And indeed, the american judiciary, has no principle of good faith discussion, no guarentee of investigation: But a judge, who in a hearing, both sides speak to. The judge then comes back with a decision. There is no oversight, just by the next round of judges, victims and vulnerable to this structure as the one that just heard you. Good faith, enlightened discussion, reduces crime. Yet American Judiciary has paniced into this stilted form that neither insures honest judges, or requires honest good faith real politic sit-downs to figure out what to do, to even reduce crimes so a bit. Such promotion of honest good faith discussion between parties; so what if one party is criminally more powerful, at least let’s force a sit down to see if we can get honest discussion. Such promotion of hònest good faith dialogue, even as it encompasses criminal element, would reveal our government as hopelessly not the strongest power at the table. The promotion of government through law enforcement and penal system as a scary strongest power, is another bit of fiction, for this satanic structure to play through. Political parties, the military, bonds of religious faith, bonds of crime and oligarthic money, all of this secret establishment, can be stronger than one judge deciding a conflict; especially if these judges have gone along before, or groomed for this disgraceful, and inconceivably as desired, conduct. And through this, an honest rendition of sovereignty has been blurred.

The greatest problem is you can point out something clearly wrong to government and they won’t respond, or send a form letter, and literally have the attitude of getting rid of you, not having to deal with your honesty and good faith at all, or as little as possible. This is the importance of establishing the state constitutional route to access, and alter and reform, via following codifications in state constitutions. If you see things clearly, you have the sovereiegn interest and should be able to access and work with government. But this is precisely the separation of people and state, desIgned by the constitution, and precisely the constitution designed by History, and a History designed by who, what, and how. Thus when it is most important, a form to discuss with government, is least, nor promoted by law. Thus this Virginia State Codification is essential to enshrine, and apply.

My readers are the people, and goverment officials or employees who read my filings, or correspondence of concerns. Is there a division between what the government understands, and you understand of this? Does the government reader have less comprehension than you. When is the manifestation of comprehension. Totalitarianism.

Gall accounted for the vulnerability of officials to networks with greater loyalty and efficiacy than government; indeed aware of the metaphysical destruction upon tribal requirements, the metaphysical forcing, of what tribes don’t want; this they combatted, according to ceasar’s account of his campaigns there, through a judicial system of conflict resolution, ceasing tensions between wrongers and wronged, through lawyer like galls, who would rise in estimation, per effectiveness, and thus by being the choice of the people, on a dispute by dispute basis, if one lawyer, was resolving matters poorly, so a next one could be tried, upon the mere whim of parties involved trying other mediators. A mediator didn’t exist beyond his present matter. There was no entrenched person it had to go through.

And there was no assumption the governmental concerns and qualities of the mediator, were strong enough to enforce justice by might. Critically, there was no automatic tendency to a great or greater power enforcing justice; but an understanding reason looks into unjust matters, and does the best it can. Such disposition is a compromise, not the ideal, but the pragmatism that realizes, a greater power, than what is concentrated in one with official power, can and has and does overwhelm official power. Thus the people must be able to assert their dispositions upon mediators and handlings. For which Gall also practiced noon village council meetings which 50% of the attendees, counted as a say; 50% of the village or so, the more mature 50%, was encouraged to participate in feedback, disposition and voice votes; according to Ceasar.

In our way, a subverted and inadequate court system facilitates the crime upon our wealth; from which wisdom is forsaken; Yet even the route to discussion of these judicial issues experienced, with the division of law; of which whom is the lawyer of the judges, and the caretaker of laws; which, in, at least, is not even a remedy in law; indeed the remedy in law line, seems impossible in a system created for no remedy in law; and yet even the legal and lawful and constitutional, higher than statutory, yet with no case law; that I know of; these issues are too deep; so, an opportunity; is not comprehended by the division of law, which per R.12:? Receives a copy of all filings before the supreme court regarding constitutional matter; even this natural path, and plank to the division of law, is subverted from intention.

Thus we have law, without enforcement. As Locke Noted. And the guardians of our rights, seem to not guard them; in kick to the rear of Plato’s Utopia top quarter of society being made guardians of the rest; as the 25% middle and upper classes, have created a reasonable economy; as patrick henry noted, and the galls seized, no one guards rights, that makes no sense. I am going to protect your property? How can I get that close to you to protect it?

We’d discuss whether the scant enforcement is structured on purpose, to have little critical effect, without rate reduction.


“Section 3. Government instituted for common benefit.

That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.”

Again, this is art 1 2a of the N.J. Constitution, from where I started all over again : ”  a.  All political power is inherent in the people.  Government is instituted for the protection, security, and benefit of the people, and they have the right at all times to alter or reform the same, whenever the public good may require it.  “

If the invocation of this law, in a standing matter, can’t compell the propiety civilization promises, without recourse to the Supreme Court of America, then how is this law applied? To a tone able to round people to the righteousness one, commanding a sought tone?” What is so hard about merely discussing the situation at hand, as lawyers or concerned citizens would? Because such discussion has been suppressed so far, it can not logically be unsuppressed by me; without some considerable jostling, for it has been jostled a bit.


“Section 6.

Free elections; consent of governed.That all elections ought to be free; and that all men, having sufficient evidence of permanent common interest with, and attachment to, the community, have the right of suffrage, and cannot be taxed, or deprived of, or damaged in, their property for public uses, without their own consent, or that of their representatives duly elected, or bound by any law to which they have not, in like manner, assented for the public good.”

This to me, is a very important illusion to point out. On paper, and remember our history is so much on paper, and paper, can say anything, so the notion of private property, in face of the kingdom of god, is illusion, propoganda for History, against tribal notions, where still linger to this day in parts, tribal grazing lands, tribal pastures, which were recognized way around Italy approaching Ceasar’s time, until the democratic party assumed charge, for its superior weilding of the military, and thus would take tribal grazing lands as federal lands, and grant them as colonies or land grants to soldiers, in return for their warfare, and citizens to appease them.

Another constitutional precept some states include in their bill of rights, some don’t; is treating victims with respect: how is this done; when the judge-system disrespects you, and its worse than the matter itself, indeed, the matter is predicated upon the protection of an unjust judiciary.

The notion of free elections is contingent upon atheism. The subversion of society by the means of less, to the needs of less, is in many places, and levels.

separation of state and people, and bad, and which has more spirit, which is rude history, which doesnt makke sense or believe in the people?
Atheism not religion, historical ontext and actual law orwell


Letter from Thomas Jefferson, of Virginia, Governor, President, Statesman “

“We have long enough suffered under the base prostitution of law to party passions in one judge, and the imbecility of another. In the hands of one the law is nothing more than an ambiguous text, to be explained by his sophistry into any meaning which may subserve his personal malice” (Thomas Jefferson, To John Tyler Monticello, May 26, 1810)

Again, this obliguely reminds us how political parties are structured to be stronger than the government, and dictate policies, or derive benefits, upon through.
It is political savvy to raise issues of judgement by many, judgement, contingent upon one matter at a time, an acknowledging government sovereignty is no greater than a vassal state under Rome’s; were Rome a secret criminal network; as such pretext by the less, facilitates more destruction of earth., hub to the universe, it may be.


People talk of the need to realize the full effect of the words in the constitutions. But in a world, that claims to be ruled by law, but this rule goes through men, we are really ruled by men, the laws are there to be looked at, but it is the men who make decisions. And without verymuch oversight. Jeep David argues the granting to judges an immunity to civil prosecution, and citizen prosecution, effectively grants an emolument or class of nobility, insofar as the nobility was immune to suit, a nobility being a part of the sovereignty, could recuse itself from suit upon it, because its power simply enabled such. This basic contradiction, consists with many others, to be worked out.

Floyd and Barker (1607) “And those who are the most sincere, would not be free from continual Calumniations,” in all cases it is the judiciary’s responsibility to avoid “vexatious” or calumnious actions to the best of their ability not concede to their inevitability.  “Vexatious” or calumnious actions are hazards in any human endeavor.

And yet the immunity status granted to Judges regarding USC 42 1983 prosecution of civil rights violations, such as by judiciary, grants a royal power. It is vextatious and calumnious. Propoganda would have us see our representative government as inimical to nobility, and in direct reaction to nobility; but really, not only is it in effect the same thing, of the removed and vulnerable making decisions for and leading us, and us not really getting much word in edgewise; nor much palpable gain; but the roman republic and classical Italy, essentially and vitally tied together government, representative, senatorial, judicial government, with the nobility, through laws allowing only the noble class to be knights and druids and senators. It was two class society, with the upper class allowed to participate in government. Even though the class is less distinct and defined, and the poor do become rich leaders, government itself, still operates as a noble class, therefore for the a larger noble class. Representative government can be seen as a lateral step from autocratic nobility; and not as “higher” than it, or more common and egalitarian than it, as too oft considered.


The first important thing to do: If alians are long in control of earth, and running history, through a literal subverting of the human brain, which is a literal metaphysic, than the people in prison, and all of history didn’t do it, and need release, and relief. There, this is the maine, this is the tactic, this is the path we are fighting along, though fighting is not the right word;


I dont feel I am dealing with anyone, but dealing with God.
how else could crime flow so swiftly

Michigan has a principle, whereby the constitution must operate on popular understandings, or understandings of the constitution, that most people know or have, and therefore are popular understandings.

2a) due process to protect individual, criminal, civil, and it doesn’t, failed, disparagedd me, lied, murder, no response, due process shouldnt exist, more about being kept from being screwed over, which is precisely the area thats been happened, atmosphere for screwing over, and due process =being screwed over, because government is not greater than crooks, our form is wea and subverted to crime, or falsehood, ignorance, exploitaion; . be the reasoning party, force sue peace come togeherr, ok, but then reason and greater powers, now you have distance, rule by greater power, through law, with no checck on them

Recourse to law? Due Process? None what to do/

fàct can’t deal, power fourth through stilte

PAG v commission, the route to division of law.; no good faith form, to mechancial judges
my instance cant say 1, can’t say two, what to do, past, and future brain.

its not to punish
its from not taking care of yourself, mechanism of society voids care as well.

Section 2. People the source of power.That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.

See this is in 2a and exactly what is happening, denial of public access upon something wrong and systemic dealt with calmly.

Section 3. Government instituted for common benefit.That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, r7j9i0nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.

You see, though commanded in law and verse, the division of law, systemically protects organized long entrenched criminal patterns; Though I explain the transcendant nature of t, historical perspective, history as fake, as the control needed to do this, transcends and becomes about a control of earth, neither desire, nor necessarily earthly, and incorporate christian terms; there is still no answer.

This is difficult, and so we become the division of law, with the entrusted protection of the division of law, and corresponding, the people.

Yet a psychological evaluation of the system, comes to these three prongs; 1) People are unable to address this scope and dimension, because they and society do not give attention to themselves as violated, oppressed, and exploited greatly, beyond worldly consideration, into metaphysical terroritory, individuals and society ignores spiritual and presbytarian services, as Jesus plugs a gap blocking one’s view of the pagan pantheon; thus withou awareness, they react without thought to the premises.

2) People may not be allowed to address these issues, and once allowed will respond very nicely to these issues.

3) THe metaphysic of this, is more intimate and twisted. It is a very deep situation. No one wants this.

I have very little confidence in the supreme court understanding this. Ironically media help and media focus, the media alteration of history, provides enough ballast to transcend judical prejudice. Things can be understood here in the media, in a way they can’t be understood, away from here., away from media or sense, alone, secretive, criminally coerced. Obviously the blending of coercion from criminal or metaphysic, would be a salvatory conversation. As it is, respondent fails to recognize the hall marks of murder, control of family; do they understand nothing? Do they accept hiding crime throughout their careers? The contract is negated into you, trying to help them, you become their lawyer, seems to be the relationship.

Commission state route div let
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985 our media neglects, and we just cover and are limited to then, and even derivations and alternatives are contextualized by mass media, and limited by their conception, mainly that we can and should live tribally…….you dont get the abscence of that signifies a totalitarian contro by mass media. You are so far frrom the terror of the lord.

 U.S. Code § 1986 – Action for neglect to prevent

Rule of law? We all want to talk but can’t say, hoboken criminals as well http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1985
Not disabled, nor ever construed as such, working helping vera—currently money taken, people know, serge, vern, judges system others, just talk, still i control

Not taking care of ourselves and societý media so about introducing it. Through this matter with you, but you are controlled. By forces, enabling
Want to take to supreme court, you wont lawyer help? So what meditation changes this.

What is the control? It is close to me; your reactionaryism, when if we do interact, is literally a part of us not dealing with what “you” really are; and if you havent dealt with that, what can you deal with. Thus you, or we have to understand our own loss to move forward and clear and clean up what we can.

If you or we are able to deal with that, then we might move forward, yet there are more enlightened people or are there, and where does enlightnement start, with one here? On tv? With old people realizing they didnt get a life?
Gov policing itself, constipation, mechanical nature dmitted to judges

Section 12. Freedom of speech and of the press; right peaceably to assemble, and to petition.That the freedoms of speech and of the press are among the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained except by despotic governments; that any citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, nor the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances.

But this still removes and disables policing for which crime all over etc, war, local officials

(2) (a) The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction only, except it shall have the power to issue all writs necessary in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, or the complete determination of any cause, or as may be required to exercise control of the Court of Justice.

Writ here then commission?
Again Section 1: Rights of life, liberty, worship, pursuit of safety and happiness, free speech, acquiring and protecting property, peaceable assembly, redress of grievances, bearing arms.All men are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights, among which may be reckoned:First: The right of enjoying and defending their lives and liberties.Second: The right of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences.Third: The right of seeking and pursuing their safety and happiness.Fourth: The right of freely communicating their thoughts and opinions.Fifth: The right of acquiring and protecting property.Sixth: The right of assembling together in a peaceable manner for their common good, and of applying to those invested with the power of government for redress of grievances or other proper purposes, by petition, address or remonstrance.Seventh: The right to bear arms in defense of themselves and of the State, subject to the power of the General Assembly to enact laws to prevent persons from carrying concealed weapons.Text as Ratified. on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 2: Absolute and arbitrary power denied.Absolute and arbitrary power over the lives, liberty and property of freemen exists nowhere in a republic, not even in the largest majority.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28,

Again, no police by the people powers, very limited, about protecting yourself and changing government if necessary. Does petition mean to effect change, or have a physical injury, or grievance in broad legal senses; arms, speech, communicate, even aquire, assembly, (misses petition). All about changing, must extend to 2a HERE; and yet crritically without invested means, as gov invested in, or establishedd means, to change, just these ways, of tehe much less powerful than government to stand up to government.

This is very flawed. Constitution, nature of its irremovability media lord, but also just way things are done near me.

Section 4: Power inherent in the people — Right to alter, reform, or abolish government.All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper.

So this is the sole manifestation of policing, flimsy, untested, true, and yet no enforcement of it.

All courts shall be open, and every person for an injury done him in his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law, and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 15: Laws to be suspended only by General Assembly.
But this shows remedy by law doesnt exist, not possible judge to admit each corrupted hands over, because no decisions made, see, no decisions, based on atheistic assumption that doesnt exist. Neither enforcement, nor means of enforcement

Atheism, and simply not true by this structure so how is it uncaught? Well first how do I catch it? I read laws. So then can we assume others dont and the lord control. The lord controls. ??? What can we talk about this, anyone, how I know this Division of Law, how do I know this and others don’t. Can we just discss that, can anyone


Section 22: Standing armies restricted — Military subordinate to civil — Quartering soldiers restricted.No standing army shall, in time of peace, be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly; and the military shall, in all cases and at all times, be in strict subordination to the civil power; nor shall any soldier, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, except in a manner prescribed by law.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 23: No office of nobility or hereditary distincDDtion, or for longer than a term of years.The General Assembly shall not grant any title of nobility or hereditary distinction, nor create any office the appointment of which shall be for a longer time than a term of years.Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891. History: Not yet amended.Section 24: Emigration to be free.Emigration from the State shall not be prohibited.
Standing army principle, emigration implies fear of other thing, tribal serf?

Section 26: General powers subordinate to Bill of Rights — Laws contrary thereto are void.To guard against transgression of the high powers which we have delegated, We Declare that every thing in this Bill of Rights is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate; and all laws contrary thereto, or contrary to this Constitution, shall be void.

1law of sea, 2, no quarter symbolic, real deceptive of lack of police; ex of law invioate enshrined yet not, law is bs
Div of lw fishman, corzine, and tenth and peaceful assebly, legal form, why do I know this? Also 2a 04-366, or just talk; just want to woork with, not adversarial, d

Article III.Section. 1.The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.Section. 2.

What is Judicial Power. Basic decisions and understanding not raised, why me. Judicial power should be about creating Justice. How is that done. Conceentration of power means crime hides behind judges they control. Atheism is inimical to Justice, our judiciary so pressured by atheism, reality and calming truth that resolves conflict, indeed, changes our way; But the gallic model would be leading lawyers, subject to popularity, resolving disputes by meddiating between powers. Gall acknowledged strong asociations, outside of government and stronger than government, a fact today, orleads. Thus its not judicial power, but mediating justice, showing the unjust, injustice is wrong. We don’t have that opportunity we do not show light or create peace, the point is to punish. The assumption of Judicial power here, excludes mediation between factions, per camoflage of being able to enforce right.

The Jersey plan for judiciary, left civil and criminal matters to state, and had a judiciary that approoved treaties and pacts, between states, which is not allowed by the virgnian plan, that could extend historically into a check upon legislation for morality and concerns of law.

—–What is “the United States”? States that are united, but not necessarily bound to the unity of the constitution, federal, if you follow reading, we are a unity of states, for the purpose of protectioon from indians and europe, this is not longer needed or feasible. Again why is this outside the debate.

What is one supreme Court? A limitatioon and concentration into nine judges and one court; whereas congress expanded per expansion of country, the judiciary and executive, has not compensated for that; signifying the rule of crime, shifting it may be, over concentrated administrative forms. Historically, the execuive can be by committee, or have one year terms, and also, be more overtly linked to the military, rather than secretly as this historical link, infers.

What are inferior courts by congress? Like a commission? When is this invoked? why is it not cited?Ther are many, congressional courts can appoint can hire judges or court personel; but it is an example of ignorance, congress never says we are rolling out an inferior court. There are commissions looking into 9/11 and Bengzhai, but these are not seen as courts, they collect data, and write analysis, and may issue charges, but that is more like a grand jury court, and the redressing power of justice, rarely cited and seen as pouring through these commissions. An inferior court may resolve an issue, but generally, these commissions, let off the FBI regarding Kennedy, and the bush administration regarding 9-11, and Bengzhai. Interesting to see what christie birdgegate leads to. In this sense parallel to justice department, prosecution, and not court per se, not manifestation of justice. Regarding my issues, would congress found* an inferior court to draw out these issues. Congress dooes have the power to subpoena. Is that an inferior court? there are no judges created and paid for these concerns, but senators on federal payroll already.

No normal judges have behaved, cite cases; complete bs ignorance of law, or even concerns concerning the sovereignty concerns. This expectation, that isoolated judges can stand up to crime, is reinforced by this payment. the implication of eliminating the threat of reducing pay, to compromise judicial integrity is also a red herring. At this level, of following orders, hard to believe anyoone can own anything, too much leverage provvided by immoral world. Atheistic pressure, and acting otherwise here, deceptive, as is basic representative premise of concentrating power, isolating and distancing government and the means to address concerns, from the people.

Article 3 section 2: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;– between a State and Citizens of another State,–between Citizens of different States,–between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State, Citizens or Subjects.

Judicial Power, or mediation. Confusion of absolute power with unity to protect a country taking land from natives, and not integrating or accepting their lifes typle and tribal understandings. In law and Equity, arising under constituton, means not foreign treaties, and state treates pacts not allowed conspicuosly missing—-ambassadors, ministers and counsels, scooter libby taking fall for dick cheney comes tomind, Is the U.S. A party to enforce N.J.? what about state. And I don’t need judicial power, I need good faith honest discussion, and work, working through these concerns with government per 2a. Due process subject legally to judicial discretion, when really great issues law. How often controversies between states, wind power and texas obligation, few water rights, amputating states, bills of credit, less monolithic more special and unique economic development would have ocurred between states; Goal of reducing work week, increasing quality, lost, for education that has not resulted in awareness, thinkking together, of these issues.
State and citizens, banned by eleventh, misplayed Hans bad opportunity. What ministers and counsels, Why not secrataries, girl thing, or commie term?

Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.Section. 3.

Again, ambassadors, ministers and consuls, are terms we dont use and demonstrate how archaic our constitution is, shows a plane were the needs it served are uuseless and counter productive now, why do I get it …is Stevens a case? Supreme court has original jurisdiction…..law and facts so far ignored, hope? Also what regulations has congress made, has this been acted on congress regulating the supreme court, seems allowed but not practiced, as is society honestly…i guess thats procedural title code guidance like 85 and 86…..and yet is there a need for 85 and 86, isnt justice obvious, and regulations by congress…..just what regulations would be made, kinder to liittle guy, exposing fraud co-opptioon, more judges?

 against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.Article. IV. Speaks to law of sea, international means, selling out of america, bin laden in pakistan, how is there two warring parties in togethher, treasson at highest level; nature of generals to go along with war, how much that involves helping each other, while klling each other?

Div law, honoken illegal, for,sign not come up as offensive to power tpvut vern involved,how know….



That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare:

Sec. 1. FREEDOM AND SOVEREIGNTY OF STATE. Texas is a free and independent State, subject only to the Constitution of the United States, and the maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired to all the States.

Sec. 2. INHERENT POLITICAL POWER; REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their benefit. The faith of the people of Texas stands pledged to the preservation of a republican form of government, and, subject to this limitation only, they have at all times the inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think expedient.

Sec. 3. EQUAL RIGHTS. All free men, when they form a social compact, have equal rights, and no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive separate public emoluments, or privileges, but in consideration of public services.

1) in brief preamble, “free” signifies free from criminal interests, specifically a free from criminal interest judiciary and legislature and executive;;directly applicable to those trying to access and reform state government.
2) Not everything in law is good. Some is bad. Sec One is interesting and different. Each state’s section one highlights some state priority. Like N.J. Cites protection of life property and liberty; Texas highlights the federal government, stating its loyalty to the federal constitution; this is interesting on several points. We havent seen other states cite the USA. Texas several times has been voted state most likely to secede, so its pointing out the United States, is ambiguos, and perhaps foil, by highlighting. Citing free institutions and perpetuity of the union, Texas goes on to cite, the right to local self-government, which is ambiguos and bad, as local selfgovernment excercises per tenth amendment powers not givern to the federal government, as reserved for the state or the peòple though, excludes local officials, as local officials are neither state nor the people. Thus the state of N.J. Its law annals say, the state legislature made local decisions, such as zoning and traffic lights. The alternative is the people making local decisions with ayes and nays in peaceful assembly as practiced in smaller towns in massachussets, See Mass guide to local government. Thus highlighting local self-government, when it be in unconstitutional structure, violating 14th amendment protection of immunities, to local official, and priviledge of decision-making peaceful assemblies; as the basis for the union; not only speaks to the priorities of other states, which no state I’ve seen so far does, but, given the laws I cited, is morally ambiguos at several levels.
3) Their sec 2 is different and interesting in citation of “republican” government. I define “republican” as Machiavelli does; as uniting diverse areas that otherwise might be not united; certainly the cause for the national defense of America, this unity, and prevention of intercine state conflict. Texas is large enough to conform to this definition of “republic”, and as so republican too, as in republic, may have envy to the republic of america, show concern to other states, and highlight one of the glaring unconstitutionalities of America, (which I brought up in federal court, 04-366, some time agon, to no avail”. Texas also uses the language, “abolish” which is hard core, and “expedient” as well, signifiying the importance of expediently reducing crime, meaning established interests will get hurt. But seems to demand a committent to republican principles noted above.
4) Sec 3 is interesting, because ir recognizes government class has a different set of rights; This references the roman republic, where the government class, had a separate set of rights than the plebian class, because only the patricians were allowd to serve in government, and thus government service venerated by propoganda. That said, the government class is generally a part of the problem, not solution.

Chris Tea

April 5, 2014


IMPORTANT: The Mastro Report revealed Christie gave orders to cold shoulder calls to his office from Mayors, not on board. (like a splash fight in a pool) and this reveals something critical. It reveals there are rings controlling the votes in each town, and the mayor is always about which ring is controlling it. Christie wanted and dealt for those controlled votes. This is proven because who got the cold shoulder and who didn’t wasn’t based on policy, or anything. It had to be based on who is getting the votes. The luck of the irish has it; that Christie’s behavior implies total control of vote outcomes, town by town, via-mayor-duct, so a much much greater issue comes out; routine rigging or control and creation of vote counts, town by town. And this is consistent with the allure of the electoral college system to our government; there is a parallel state by state control of its presidential votes, and losing that leverage, harms the ruling scenario.

1) This is about a mayor’s endorsement; it’s about the deliverance of votes; the organization of which is a sovereign concern; for which government need not cowl itself as the strongest power,

Again, this situation implies a metaphysic. A metaphysic does this. SO it is true, and yet reveals a metaphysical reality behind it, once we go through the truth


Chris Christie is very interesting. I believed in him in 2008. We needed a prosecutorial approach to N.J.. I said that in several hundred phone calls out of Hamilton N.J.. I tried to explain that even though the republicans are losers in N.J., there is still hope, and we have to be optimistic and confident. The Corzine Governorship was a disaster that literally showed, the morality play of someone from another state, failing to understand this one; in the grossest way, of being exploited by local political machines to line their pockets give him the senate seat, in exchange, then have him win the governorship, incurring another round of expense, and appoint as Senator, Menendez, who would never be incumbent otherwise, and was the notorious Hudson County Executive after Janiewski, who turned in a slew of criminals in the late nineties. What happened, a senator running for governor then appointing his senatorial replacement, is illegal in most states. It’s unacceptable, because you can strong arm wealthy senators into running for governor, and appointing one of your own.

I noticed this scenario, and brought it up years ago. But the distance between me and government is too great, government, took our power, and created a distance, where we don’t know what is going on, and get no honest concern, in a mechanical and automatic way; that, in a spiritual way, is very disturbing. I don’t know if one could go private attorney general on this, if wire or mail was used towards extortion Corzine into leaving the Senate for Menedez, for goverment polices government, that’s the constitutional flaw; but I care about my governor, and if the attorney general’s office can’t protect the coercion of a governor, they sure aren’t going to stop the next one from rambling on so.

There are scant means to look into this, if the word is out on it.

But with Christie, you saw a prosector cleaning up N.J. corruption on a federal white horse; but what was really going on, was that the one’s left standing had to play ball with him, leveraging his political rise. He was more machinated than the machine itself; the bounce in his stride, the catcher’s disdain for standing, the class president, these were things machines can only want. And as he got better and better, the oils and springs got looser and looser, till he moved up the replacement election of Senator Lautenberg, from the general election, to dissuade Corey Booker voters from messing his numbers. That is five year old behavior. As is closing bridges and giving port authority projects for endorsements, (and endorsements are wholly unamerica bs in that no one should tell anyone how to vote, the vote is fixated upon each thinking for himself, and that’s honest society). And this is why no republicans were added to the legislature, much to the dismay of jersey republicans, there was no translation between a republican governor, and democratic legislative, despite the polls.

Then, this commission, by an associate, absolving him of knowing about the bridge closing? his is further five year old behavior, that speaks to a hubris, where the lights are shining so bright, he don’t really see, he’s operating by touch and feel alone. If cover up is worse than crime, then he still hasn’t got that part down yet.

He picked on school teachers out of repressed dislike of the form of education upon New Jersey, as it forms the mold, of the upper classes. Bipartisanship based on port authority projects, sandy funds on municipal decision; that’s the oposite of bipartisanship, that’s the oposite of those Sandy Ads. Why go on TV promoting Sandy Aid, and then use it to force approval of new construction projects.

His lack of control of his anger and weight, somehow amazingly, played out to a positive, in charismatic appeal.

Christie turned me on to the Republican Party of N.J. locally. I went to their monthly evenings at a local bar. This was far superior from apolectic local democrats, who legally accused me of co-opting their rights to the word “democrat”. I met the republican I ran against as a third party that year locally. I enjoyed the people. They had breakfasts too, reminiscient of mens group, perhaps co-ed fraternities. I had no problems with them, and made phone calls for Christie.

I feel betrayed. I feel like tony soprano’s wife is she ever found out past her own deluded head, Tony was a mobster and did five yr old, things and it was getting worse.

It’s a vote that leaves a bad stick in my side, like ugh, I was really fooled, I thought she was so pretty, but she is worse than all the rest, and has serious one percent moral issues. Or maybe they are all like that, and she can talk about what torments her into petty egomaniac behavior.

I voted for Jill Stein on her platform of reducing the military in half, run-off elections to break from the two party mold, and green energy; and have never been happier about a vote of mine; it resonates to this day, a little hymm to voting on beliefs, taught me to never again not vote for someone I don’t like. Now Christie I voted for, not on issues, but prosecutorial approach, having no idea of how he used this to fuel his political or financial interests; there were no real issues. Where does the money go, what does government do, isn’t there a much better way. Corzine never understood Jersey. Christie conflating going Jersey, with going Christie.

In a way, it was like Tony Soprano’s wife waking up. Better to be awake, than asleep; In Nod, knowing, than Eden, ignorant. The wheeling and dealing off the balls of feet, under port authority tables, the spring required, and the sheer spirit of outplaying the hated long oppressing democratic machine at their own game. And then having the bluster to go down in a sinking ship of most jersey trappings, rather than inflict our armpits upon the whole country, as previous presidents often do, subconsciously, as if psychologically, this is a start.

I saw Christie onTV, at the Boomer Esaison Roast, Super Bowl Weekend. That was another disaster. The same president of jersey transit who lost a 120 million worth of trains by storing them in flooding county, neither calculated how many trains would be needed for the superbowl, nor allow cab drop-offs, and chargedd 150.00 for parking rights; I mean, that’s about the worse Jersey looks. I couldn’t paint a worse picture of this struggling yet ultimately earnest state.

But there he was on the Easiason Roast, the day after Wilderstein accussed him of having evidence Christie knew; as if nothing bothered him, his comic timing was down, he was as if a charactor on Seinfield who was governor of N.J. and would fill up Jerry’s apartment with jokes about how bad the jets are; that at ease. He had totally psyched out the humiliation of showing up at a roast, with the ramparts breaking down water on several sides, his troops defecting, federal armies of lawyers lurking like orcs beyond the light………..however, his rooting for the cowboys, not local teams, underscores a well-meant oversight of local politics, and his rooting for the yankees fails to understand how a union, can make an industry worse, insofar the yankees buying talent and hatred, is bad for the league.

He was a bit mean to the staid and boring Boomer.

Christie’s personality enabled the same refrains of looting the state and pockets as Corzine; It’s just Corzine, like Obama and W, are obviously doing what they are told. Look how no one took Corzine’s troubles seriously and he went on to darning some hole in a pocket three billion was accused of falling out of.

What you get when you look at Christie, that you don’t get when you look at Bush, Obama, and Corzine; is the sense, that maybe, in that irish way even, able to talk about what is really going on? Because the money goes where the money goes, in both criminal and automatic fashion. Crime is a little too base for honesty, and the automatic control of you, through School and Capitalism, well, pagans ascribe that to greater darkness, I understand, but still, there are crimes automatically going on, and we have to ask, can Christie talk about it. Is the mobster air there for effect, or reflecting a greater actor and player? Who would go along with the corrupt nefarious ways, and middle class and upper class jobs and lives; It’s not good enough, it doesn’t exist, and there is easy alternative, of thinking together, and of what really is, even especially, the darkness. It’s creation itself, creation as what doesn’t make sense, as requiring creation to come about, and not naturally; Creationism is the Stage History is On.

This political situation is so much an upper and middle class thing; where everything is accepted and deemed as good; where working with your hands and not getting married, is alianated. It is the financial, economic, and jobbing, form of the middle and upper class, that where crime runs through and controls with ease. And it’s created, it’s controlled, without an interest to resolution, to keep going, until something metaphysical is seen, we need the most talking, in a constructive, not punitive, trusting, not suspicious, climate. And if talking doesnt exist, but in secrecy festering, well then, these economic, financial forms upon you or us, are so molded away from reason, that metaphysical totalitarian works it sway, analogous to darkness, form and control, unreasonable.

Christie’s farsighted coercion lasered in on bipartisan poll numbers for national appeal, and no republicans were added to legislative rolls. This is something the Rino Rafs hate. (Republicans against Fakes) He got along with the machine, which dominates his party in his state. And the affection generated by his grace, and brand, gives him an adulation naturally fitted for national stage. Usually N.J. Governors, are staid and boring.

Christie evokes McGreevey. Everything seemed fine, but right under the surface, something different and sinister loomed. The difference is Christie has the appeal and charisma, McGreevey lacked, to play through. Perhaps the humiliation of closing bridge lanes, shouldn’t be equated to the humiliation of sexual behavior, and certainly it is fake to not come out, and true to do what is done; but one governor can psyche out his circumstances that’s for sure. The lights were or are shining on both of them.

McGreevey never talked about a situation where an isreali native he slept with, became involved with Port Authority and N.J. Security. Can Christie talk about what is really going, that makes a man commission a study in his favor as if there is a place where that’s OK? Is the delusion so great, he is the one in control? Or is the control of christie so great as to compell another few hundred thousand off the top of this work?

How does corruption work? It seems morally undesirable? Why isn’t the system of its phenonoma, the constitution, analyzed with corruption and crime being lowered the goal? Because you go along with metaphysical control, because there is darkness. And there is no doubt representation and ensuing concentration of power in a few, creates a great built in vulnerability to crime. Was this intended? Why isn’t it an issue? Creationism?

There is a criminal substructure, to war, the concentration of power does control and incline the FBI, enforcement of law, judges, as Locke said, the issue isn’t the lack of good laws, but their enforcement. Patrick Henry spoke on losing liberty to those who guard it; in direct contradiction to Plato’s famous (corrupt?) theory.

This would be talked about. Who could go along with or want criminal substructure. It’s creationism; as ultimately the kingdom of god, and earth so for it, created. Do you dear reader know something of any of this inference? Or you go along with School and Capitalism, and voila, you go along with everything else, and you’ve never addressed any of this, because its about you, going along, that is the real issue, what makes it so easy.

Thus where can Christie address the crime structure to this predicament? Leveraging pay outs of cash cow Port Authority? Where and why does the property, sales and income tax and toll money and fees and fines go? To goverment jobs? That’s not good enough, or what we go along with. Can we talk about the crime, if not the education and capitalistic way we go aong? Is there not a larger climate that would wholly reduce crime with a wider way? and is that not acquiesced by our own the quality of going along, because;
Deep within our stars, is where we be to play with this, where we be, deep within the stars. The lights of the mind too shine in the darkness of heavy sleep, among the hunger, and ties of earth.

In 2004, august, when McGreevey resigned, in face of a lawsuit by a lover from Isreal he hired; I had litigation before the state, claiming local officials violated the reservation of powers to the state or the people, and abridged peaceful assembly, and that the people making decisions with ayes and nays locally, would reduce crime and increase the greatness of the state and all. This is a truly sovereign interest, any real, noncreated state, would be all over in discussing. Perhaps I did not provide the enlightened backdrop law enforcement requires; 04-366 District of N.J.. In any event, i would think it’s karma caused a governor to fall.

And so it is today ten years later, litigation, with five constitutional issues; 1)that the constitution concentrates power in judges to a vulnerability to control by crime, thus systemic crime seems to rule the courts. Why isn’t this brought up? Is it automatic? Designed by Constitution? 2) Article 1 2a of the ii Constitution says all power is inherent in the people, and thus the people have the right to alter and reform government for greater good at all time. Other state constitutions says the same, and thus they point path to discuss with, or police government through the attorney general’s office, as this problem of a judicial system protecting crime, seems to have overwhelmed government. 3) And this is because atheism retards government from reducing or eliminating crime, as all trades strive to eliminate problems ; The government must recognize, it is essential to reject atheism and this face value aceptance of society in order to effectively reduce crime 4) Is there common law regarding compliance to discovery when one party is greater than the other, and possibly even the court as well? 5) The stilted distance of courts, causes a lack of good faith discussion, because of a misplaced self-identity of sovereignty as meaning the greatest power around. Sovereignty means looking out for the interests of the people. It is impossible to do this without forms of good faith disussion, without ocluding and protecting from discussion, through the legal system itself. The courts or government act like the strongest power. They are not. They are a few, and there are organizations of many, with potential bonds involving many more; or, as well, this is metaphysical totalitarianism, a continuance of vehicle of pagan sacrifice, and when power is concentrated in a few, this crime as well, is enabled, in a way, enlightened society of many governing, wouldn’t.

In the complete abscence of understanding either in 2004, the value and morality of the people making local decisions in peaceful assembly with ayes and nays, as constitutional intention and protection, and now in 2014, the difficulty of assertaining what i wrote is even understood by our middle and upper top 25%., thus, as sovereign concern, in your interest this is, there is some gratutious karma whereby the governor falls unless this one, through you perhaps, lets met turn this around.

Though I am more enlightened this decade, feeling very close to hunger and digestion and brains and breath, I hope, I am still forced to conclude from this experience, people, especially pro forma government, are made, created, and thus impervious to understanding and reason. How would history go on otherwise. You aquiesce, itself oposite ringing, to school and capitalism, never addressing it, of course that substructure looms beneath the claim alleged and found on each.

Read the New Republic article on Christie. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116601/chris-christies-rise-and-fall

You see he was a corrupt prosecutor who played that power to propell his political path. The people he didn’t prosecute and left standing in N.J., then supported him for governor. It wasn’t deep pockets like Corzine, that provided the fuel to this trajectory jersey, it was reducing the number of players, to one’s that supported you, weilding federal prosecutor leverage, then translates into, as governor, unnecessary election dates, commissioning supporting douments, leveraging bi-partisan support through deals, no, my friends, if the cover up is worse than the crime, the decision to run this fake commission, when it is I who seek temporary commission to create an atmosphere of trust I may thereby look into the criminal and metaphysical more important, workings of government. For were this intended, that would be what we know.

I voted for someone on charactor, and it was an act. I voted for Stein, on her ideas, and it feels fine. These misbehaviors are huge charactor issues, not policy issues. His policies withstand scrutiny much much better than his charactor. His morality, common as it is, was in the name of the presidency. Glorifying thinkers from 1780, and so abdicating our analysis, continues to suck up, what should analyze the political phenonoma of today, and this country, and imcumbencize the convening of analysis, as good and great practice to be frequented by inquiring generations.

IMPORTANT: The Mastro Report revealed Christie gave orders to cold shoulder calls to his office from Mayors, not on board. (like a splash fight in a pool) and this reveals something critical. It reveals there are rings controlling the votes in each town, and the mayor is always about which ring is controlling it. Christie wanted and dealt for those controlled votes. This is proven because who got the cold shoulder and who didn’t wasn’t based on policy, or anything. It had to be based on who is getting the votes. The luck of the irish has it; that Christie’s behavior implies total control of vote outcomes, town by town, via-mayor-duct, so a much much greater issue comes out; routine rigging or control and creation of vote counts, town by town. And this is consistent with the allure of the electoral college system to our government; there is a parallel state by state control of its presidential votes, and losing that leverage, harms the ruling scenario.

Again, this situation implies a metaphysic. A metaphysic does this. SO it is true, and yet reveals a metaphysical reality behind it, once we go through the truth

Additional Notes:
1) How could I be so naive as to think a politician could rise up the rank like Christie, and not be especially corrupted?
2) Two close friends named Chris in my past
3) His personality is grounded in sensitivity about his weight, thats why he’s quick to anger, he’s worried the conversation will turn to his unacceptable hunger and disgestion issues. If he was skinnnier, he wouldnt be so worried about his weight, that he is so priclkly engaging in essentially activities that are role model.
4) Nothing is making sense, the whole thing isn’t making sense, kids, children to enforced school like this? Running off to a job in traffic rather than sensible discussion about what jobs are really needed. With that level of irrationality around, how can the sense of these ideas be understood. Yes some core knows the rote ridicule,


February 24, 2014

The revelation of white

This is the notion that everyone has their own trip, independent of me;

The Revelation of the collapsed galaxy

This is the notion of collapsed galaxies being around and having something, that explains our kingom.
You can not hear the universe can you? So then what would it say if you could speak for it? There are too many planets for one voice.
Thus the notion of a sheltered protected earth

The revelation of brains all over earth perceived only through imagination

This is the relevation brains attract brains, and how quiet a brainy existence on earth must be so as not to disturb the kingdom.
These are dark blue greyer somber colors.
Like tissues that seem to devolve and open up into others. Surely the exploration of the brain be one of the, studies of science and phenonoma

The revelation of Government

This the revelation that it is only the government that thinks or projects a false world, along with what I call, media and war: It is only government that does not understand the kingdom. It is only government that cries, when you would awake. So clearly the government must be reached, to clear this up; and from which perch, attract and entertain other perceptions of the true polity.

Sexy legal terms

February 22, 2014

Harmony between law and the carnal.

Res ispa loquita, —- clear cut, you can not deny having had sex with or slept with sometone

Ratio-Descento——reason behind, why, or how, that happened

Latches—-timliness, how long you knew her before, how long you intend It, to go on.

Mens Re——guilty conscience, for the carnal act. Particularily considering what you intended by the act, as opposed to harm caused by the act.

Perogative, Sovereign right———to such intercourse, or what ensues of it

Acquiescence——critical silence

Proximate Cause———- the proximate cause of something is what is really behind intimacy, and not, the reason for it.

Reasonable, doubt, beyond reasonable doubt———-regretting the act, not regreting the act…..there is a certain remoteness to such consideration…all is not forgiven, what is, is not unconditional.

Actus Reus———————-The act itself, upon which its matter hinges

Acts of God——————-The legal system is based on an erroneous consideration of a gross act of god; Sexuality is in context of a greater act of god.

Negligience ————-Negligience allows to grow what then will turn on one; negligience by design; artful, creates.

Contributory Negligience ———allows it to get worse

Audi Alteram Partem ———–allowing the other side to speak, in disputes, in general,

Quid pro quo ——————–symbolic sex

Liability——————-Liability will stress a relationship into ending

Super Bowl FAQs

January 31, 2014

Q. Why do they call it the “Super Bowl”?
A. It’s from the college word, “bowl”.

Q. Why the word “super”?
A.  Because this is the pros. And all pro teams are equal. Pros understand that, so that means any team can win, but they pick the teams to win they want. That’s why they use the word “super”.

Q. Are you saying the NFL is rigged?
A. Yea, but in a good way, as entertainment products tend to.

Q. So how did we end up with The Seahawks and Broncos?

December 11, 2013

Am reading  “The History of Rome”by Theodor Mommsen, who like Jacob Burkhardt, is from the 1800’s of Europe, but focuses more on Historical Narrative, and transmitting the literary, theatrical, even metaphorical quality of History, than Burkhard who relies on cultural analysis, and digressions.

Picked up his narrative, which, starting from the destruction of Carthage, North Africa, makes it about the latter part of the Roman Republic, i started turning the pages, about Ceasar, and his leading a further transition from Constitutional Republic, to Monarchy. This is a very interesting period.

Ceasar was a politician first, who realized political reality required becoming a general, and then led his army against Pompei’s, as The Republic Imploded from the divisions of power required to rule so large an area. He wasn’t like Hannibal, raised by his father general on military bases.

His “advenntures” are remarkable.

OK, so copy momsen above, his story of illyria and Egypt then the mutiny and Egypt, like gospel. Then the stuff from facebook, then, how he cites lincoln as ceasarian out of worse consequences, the roman reversion to temporary dictatorship, or noting all the life long monarchy, that did evil, he calls it like the bible, can be used by the devil.
Suing for peace in the ancient world of ceasars war? And Sovereignty egypt under rome.

Then write about how he reincorporated like hannibal releasing prisoners

What he really did that was great, was that he made himself dictator. there was a tradition, cincinattus, 19 days farmer, but they are asked, he made himself dictator.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.